Michchamp
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2011
- Messages
- 34,251
He's kinda right; I mean I don't agree these institutions were set up to enable child molesters or wifebeaters.
but they've been designed to crank out $$$ and anything that stood in the way of that was steamrolled, without any concern beyond keeping the dollars flowing in RIGHT NOW.
At MSU they openly cited the amount of money Lou anna simon's tenure was bringing in, as a defense to initially retaining her. and the money is not just in tickets and licensing revenue; everyone - even alumni - gives more when teams are winning. which is stupid, but for some reason, people don't write checks and say "thanks for doing the right thing."
"distractions" are buried by (almost) any means necessary, and only come out when someone in the media - without access - takes the time to dig for a story. and with the way newspapers have been gutted by private equity, there's less and less actual journalism.
I don't know whether or not as individuals we've gotten less ethical, but I do know that these institutions bring in more money relative to decades past, and I think there's more pressure on people to "do the wrong thing" so to speak.
I do think unless there's a conscious effort to prioritize ethics by the boards of directors or trustees, that organizations such as these weed out anyone with a conscience when they look at short term revenue as an end in itself.
"How much money do you make?" is the only question they ask, or care about. inevitably, the leader/executive/manager willing to do ANYTHING to raise that number, including committing fraud or turning a blind eye to a serial child abuser to protect a winning coach, wins out.
but they've been designed to crank out $$$ and anything that stood in the way of that was steamrolled, without any concern beyond keeping the dollars flowing in RIGHT NOW.
At MSU they openly cited the amount of money Lou anna simon's tenure was bringing in, as a defense to initially retaining her. and the money is not just in tickets and licensing revenue; everyone - even alumni - gives more when teams are winning. which is stupid, but for some reason, people don't write checks and say "thanks for doing the right thing."
"distractions" are buried by (almost) any means necessary, and only come out when someone in the media - without access - takes the time to dig for a story. and with the way newspapers have been gutted by private equity, there's less and less actual journalism.
I don't know whether or not as individuals we've gotten less ethical, but I do know that these institutions bring in more money relative to decades past, and I think there's more pressure on people to "do the wrong thing" so to speak.
I do think unless there's a conscious effort to prioritize ethics by the boards of directors or trustees, that organizations such as these weed out anyone with a conscience when they look at short term revenue as an end in itself.
"How much money do you make?" is the only question they ask, or care about. inevitably, the leader/executive/manager willing to do ANYTHING to raise that number, including committing fraud or turning a blind eye to a serial child abuser to protect a winning coach, wins out.
Last edited by a moderator: