I know that it would be quite cruel, bad for the Tigers' public image and well as seemingly being "ungrateful" for all of what he's done as a Tiger...and Maggs apparently had been waiting for them to offer him a swell contract and sign him late last off-season, BUT why didn't the Tigers just DFA Maggs?
A classic example of simple addition by subtraction, IMO.
This allows them to retain Maggs, yet play him VERY sparingly, if at all in the field, but his bat is just as dead as his legs are. Absent leaving him off their playoff roster, IF they clinch the CD, what is Maggs gonna be?
Their mascot??
A classic example of simple addition by subtraction, IMO.
This allows them to retain Maggs, yet play him VERY sparingly, if at all in the field, but his bat is just as dead as his legs are. Absent leaving him off their playoff roster, IF they clinch the CD, what is Maggs gonna be?
Their mascot??