Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Election Aftermath

There was build back better propaganda in the falcon and winter solider series. Yes it?s all chicom influenced conspiracy to get America to hate ourselves and rot from within. And they are succeeding sadly. Too many Cena like kowtowers

I'm aware "build back better" was one of the Biden campaign's slogans.

It's stupid and sounds grammatically incorrect.

But how is that chicom propaganda? wouldn't they not want us to "build back better"? Wouldn't they tell us "Build Back Worser" or something like that?

I'm just trying to understand.
 
I'm aware "build back better" was one of the Biden campaign's slogans.

It's stupid and sounds grammatically incorrect.

But how is that chicom propaganda? wouldn't they not want us to "build back better"? Wouldn't they tell us "Build Back Worser" or something like that?

I'm just trying to understand.

"Build Back Better" Came from the WEF.

Link Link
 
Last edited:
"Build Back Better" Came from the WEF.

Link Link

ah, I had no idea. I first heard the phrase in a clip from one of Biden's campaign events. looks like the WH is still using it.

I didn't know the WEF were the guys behind Davos.

Who funds the WEF then, if they're Chicom propaganda? The Chinese? Seems like a stretch that the Chinese are behind an NGO founded in Switzerland in 1971, unless they're REALLY playing the long game here... I guess if you can believe that, you can believe anything.
 
ah, I had no idea. I first heard the phrase in a clip from one of Biden's campaign events. looks like the WH is still using it.

I didn't know the WEF were the guys behind Davos.

Who did you think was?

Who funds the WEF then, if they're Chicom propaganda? The Chinese? Seems like a stretch that the Chinese are behind an NGO founded in Switzerland in 1971, unless they're REALLY playing the long game here... I guess if you can believe that, you can believe anything.

Xi Jinping was a keynote speaker at the last Davos conference, so there's that.

Link

?Science, technology and innovation is a key engine for human progress... China will create an open, fair, equitable and non-discriminatory scientific environment that is beneficial to all.?

R2d7c9f82c71daf9f105f4d45ff1104c5
 
Who did you think was?



Xi Jinping was a keynote speaker at the last Davos conference, so there's that.

Link

?Science, technology and innovation is a key engine for human progress... China will create an open, fair, equitable and non-discriminatory scientific environment that is beneficial to all.?

R2d7c9f82c71daf9f105f4d45ff1104c5

I know, right?
 
I'm aware "build back better" was one of the Biden campaign's slogans.

It's stupid and sounds grammatically incorrect.

But how is that chicom propaganda? wouldn't they not want us to "build back better"? Wouldn't they tell us "Build Back Worser" or something like that?

I'm just trying to understand.

It?s global reset propaganda and there were wall posters in the background during in approx 3 episodes of the falcon and winter solider with a very similar slogan it?s subliminal indoctrination

Sicking
 
nothing is going to change.

The onus is not on one side, nor is it solely on the 2 sides...there are so many dynamic things behind the scenes it makes any hope for peace in the region to appear solely as a hope.

So I agree that a change like a new Israeli PM will result in a drastic change. Even if the new PM finally stopped the Jewish practices that have the International Community so upset, the Palestinians will then try to use their new support to push back into Israel. Whichever side is "in control" is deemed oppressive and wrong, while the other side is the victim.

I feel the only legit solution might be to have a massive asteroid smash into the entire Middle East with the resulting crater filling with sea water a couple thousand feet deep. Of course those who survive will then just fight over which shoreline is Holy and everything cycles anew.
 
Oh, and the Post corrected its story about Trump and his call to the Georgia election official. Oddly, it?s in the Opinion section.

Link

Here?s the original story Link
 
Oh, and the Post corrected its story about Trump and his call to the Georgia election official. Oddly, it?s in the Opinion section.

Link

Here?s the original story Link

can't access it without a subscription, which as a conscientious objector, I can't do. What's the gist of the correction?
 
a couple other stories have fallen apart recently: the one about Trump teargassing protestors so he could go have a photoshoot with the Bible he's never read, and the one about the Trump Rioters beating a cop to death. he died of natural causes.

Should be a lesson to both sides of our political football games: cops lie all the time. don't trust them.
 
a couple other stories have fallen apart recently: the one about Trump teargassing protestors so he could go have a photoshoot with the Bible he's never read, and the one about the Trump Rioters beating a cop to death. he died of natural causes.

Should be a lesson to both sides of our political football games: cops lie all the time. don't trust them.

those stories fell apart the day they were reported. Of course the news sources that actually reported the truth won't get any credit and will continue to be labeled right wing propaganda. It's all getting quietly reported now because at the time it just wasn't convenient for the mainstream media outlets to disclose their agenda and reveal their total lack of credibility.
 
a couple other stories have fallen apart recently: the one about Trump teargassing protestors so he could go have a photoshoot with the Bible he's never read, and the one about the Trump Rioters beating a cop to death. he died of natural causes.

Should be a lesson to both sides of our political football games: cops lie all the time. don't trust them.

Yeah. You can see wagon circling over some of the stuff Trump did that they did before and will just keep on doing. Not an equivalency. Just aligned motivations.
 
can't access it without a subscription, which as a conscientious objector, I can't do. What's the gist of the correction?

?On Jan. 9, The Post reported that then-President Donald Trump, in a call with Georgia?s lead elections investigator, Frances Watson, had instructed her to ?find the fraud.? He mentioned that she could become a ?national hero,? reported the newspaper.
In both cases, the quotes were wrong, as The Post has acknowledged in a correction to the story. ?Trump did not tell the investigator to ?find the fraud? or say she would be ?a national hero? if she did so. Instead, Trump urged the investigator to scrutinize ballots in Fulton County, Ga., asserting she would find ?dishonesty? there. He also told her that she had ?the most important job in the country right now,?? reads the correction, in part.?

But it used the rest of the space to fan the flames of Trump leading right-wing extremists to insurrection.
 
?On Jan. 9, The Post reported that then-President Donald Trump, in a call with Georgia?s lead elections investigator, Frances Watson, had instructed her to ?find the fraud.? He mentioned that she could become a ?national hero,? reported the newspaper.
In both cases, the quotes were wrong, as The Post has acknowledged in a correction to the story. ?Trump did not tell the investigator to ?find the fraud? or say she would be ?a national hero? if she did so. Instead, Trump urged the investigator to scrutinize ballots in Fulton County, Ga., asserting she would find ?dishonesty? there. He also told her that she had ?the most important job in the country right now,?? reads the correction, in part.?

But it used the rest of the space to fan the flames of Trump leading right-wing extremists to insurrection.

which is also demonstrably false. but what about stochastic terrorism?!
 
which is also demonstrably false. but what about stochastic terrorism?!

Why, that?s the certain variable that can spontaneously erupt, which is why we need to defund the police and ban opinions that do not support that official narrative.
 
Back
Top