SouthOfMackinac
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2013
- Messages
- 653
When the rest of the rotation would be as good as ours (Verlander, Sanchez, Porcello, Smyly), you really don't need more than a decent innings eater as the 5th starter (also, Brad Penny was FAR from decent, and therefore not a good comparison for what I would want.) The 5th starter will only be used out of the bullpen once you get to the playoffs, and you dont need a dominant 5th starter to make the playoffs either. If none of the SP guys we had worked out, theres always FA. 5th starter is something fairly easy to fill in the offseason if you do it right, it wasnt something we needed to trade Fister for.
The names you threw out to be that 5th starter aren't as good as the old Brad Penny option which is why I thought he was the perfect comparison. I was someone who liked the Brad Penny signing at the time. I'll admit...I was wrong...So so very wrong...
DD loves pitching. That is obvious. I also think pitching is the key. He no longer had a "next guy" the moment Smyly entered the rotation and Smyly had to enter the rotation to stay in budget. Reb seems convinced there was enough money for Nathan and Fister, I've read otherwise. I've read they could have gotten a "good enough" closer instead. Rodney? Balfour?