Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

gb dal

Yet a RB can drop the ball right after he touches the white line or cone..
 
I mean really guys think about it ball never hits the ground but it's some how not a catch that's just asinine...how does it feel Dallas..dallas just had the game taken from them just like the lions had it taken from them last week
Welcome to the staged rigged NFL

The ball did hit the ground, hit when Dez came down, that's what caused the ball to move and pop out of his hands for a moment.
 
CJ rule, it was right to be overturned..

This one was different at least with CJ you can make the aurgement the ball hit the ground as he used it to push himself up from the ground, this one here he didn't drop it, it never hit or touched the ground yet it's not a catch hell I think he retained control in the end zone and it should have been over turned into touch down imo...stupid stupid rule
 
I get that the way that rule is written that that probably isn't a catch, but it's a dumb and poorly written rule. He went up for the ball, secured possession, had both feet hit the ground while still maintaingin possession, then took an additional half step as he steadiest himself before falling and and having the ball trapped against the ground as he hit it.

If you have both feet touch the ground after securing posession it should be a catch even if you happen to fall after that.

I agree. The only reason he lost the ball is because he was reaching out to try and have the ball cross the goal line. To me he had established possession by that point and now he should be treated like a runner with the ball. A runner can reach the ball out at that point and Dez should have been ruled down just short of the goal line.
 
I feel somewhat redeemed that the cowboys lose on whats called the calvin rule lmao. fuck them...
 
Well there's our first #1 vs #2 matchup. Now we see if Denver can complete the other.
 
Well that was fun yippy ki eh NFL conjob returned to Dallas the party bus was only good for a home playoff win GB gets the upper rig job hand this week to advance . Lol

Oohhh whatever it's all rigged ladies and gentlemen it's all rigged for ratings, best feel good stories, party buses and or best yes man..rigged rigged rigged

Lmao
 
I'll bet the NFL network ex Dallas guys will want to discuss this CJ now now all night long, hehe should be fun
 
It's going to be really funny seeing all the Cowboy fans whine about this after telling Detroit to quit bitching all last week.
 
Last edited:
This one was different at least with CJ you can make the aurgement the ball hit the ground as he used it to push himself up from the ground, this one here he didn't drop it, it never hit or touched the ground yet it's not a catch hell I think he retained control in the end zone and it should have been over turned into touch down imo...stupid stupid rule

You must have not seen the replay very good. It very clearly goes through his hands and hits the ground. It was not a catch.
 
This is what I don't get....what studio ref Mike Perria (sp?) keeps saying. He didn't make a move common to the game. What does that mean? He had 3 feet down and dives forward to reach the ball across the goal line. How is that not a football move or a move common to the game?

Why does a receiver have to do insane shit to demonstrate he has possession?
 
This is what I don't get....what studio ref Mike Perria (sp?) keeps saying. He didn't make a move common to the game. What does that mean? He had 3 feet down and dives forward to reach the ball across the goal line. How is that not a football move or a move common to the game?

Why does a receiver have to do insane shit to demonstrate he has possession?

Rule 14.101 Section B, part 1, paragraph 11-4 sub-section 3.6 of the WR code says: See CJ rule.
 
Back
Top