Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Hoops

Crazy that we had 2 chances to tie and Jace didn't touch the ball. Terrible decisions by fears on the last one and izzo drew up a horrible play on the first. Didn't deserve to win that
 
So according to the net ranking we are a 3 seed. Maryland still ahead of us and according to the NCAA site the only stats they lead us in are WAB and quad 4 wins. We won all our quad 4 games but only played half as many as MD.

Alabama’s stats don’t look as good either.

There’s something wrong with the Net rankings.
 
So according to the net ranking we are a 3 seed. Maryland still ahead of us and according to the NCAA site the only stats they lead us in are WAB and quad 4 wins. We won all our quad 4 games but only played half as many as MD.

Alabama’s stats don’t look as good either.

There’s something wrong with the Net rankings.
They give points for blow out wins. So teams like Gonzaga get bonus points for beating up on quad 4 teams. It's extremely flawed.
 
Id expect they do the right thing amd still make us a 2. Winning a major league by 3 games has to be rewarded. That being said, im sure they will do anything they can to match us up with Omaha(Fidler’s) former team and then try for a vandy match up for a hoggard reunion. Usually when a team gets a surprising seeding its to force a match up.

Also, I could see them trying for a 2md round msu/Oklahoma match up. Fears v fears
 
uofm beats Wisconsin twice including BTT final, has a better record and finished higher in B1G standings, gets a 5 and wisco gets the 3. So weird.
 
uofm beats Wisconsin twice including BTT final, has a better record and finished higher in B1G standings, gets a 5 and wisco gets the 3. So weird.
They really don't care what happens in that conference tourney. They'll never admit it, but I'm certain the draw is 99% finished before the weekend. They might have to adjust a couple teams they didn't expect to make it. UM didn't finish the regular season well and that's a big one. 9-6 last 15 games, all 9 wins were by 4 or less pts and they got hammered in 4 of the 6 losses. Especially bad in the last 6 going 2-4 with 3 of those losses at home. I even thought they'd get a 3 or 4, but once I saw all that I understood. Wisconsin at 3 is kinda high, but I really don't see much gap in all the 3-6 seeds this year.
 
They really don't care what happens in that conference tourney. They'll never admit it, but I'm certain the draw is 99% finished before the weekend. They might have to adjust a couple teams they didn't expect to make it. UM didn't finish the regular season well and that's a big one. 9-6 last 15 games, all 9 wins were by 4 or less pts and they got hammered in 4 of the 6 losses. Especially bad in the last 6 going 2-4 with 3 of those losses at home. I even thought they'd get a 3 or 4, but once I saw all that I understood. Wisconsin at 3 is kinda high, but I really don't see much gap in all the 3-6 seeds this year.
I hear you but I’m not trying to make the case that uofm should be a 3 and wisco should be a 5. It just seems odd that they are 5-8 spots lower than a team they beat twice and finished ahead of in the conference standings. Even if you ignore the BTT, it seems weird. it’s not like wisco finished strong, they went 2-3 in their last 5 games and played themselves out of a possible tie for 2nd by losing to psu at home, finishing 4th.
 
Back
Top