Houston currently 2nd among NFC cbs in pro bowl

[lions2011]

Romo is good for about 3,800yrds 28tds and a 96 qbr. That's pretty damn good.

Staffs good for about 4400+ yards 35 Tds and a 90+ rating....is ok for you ?

 

[wolverine304]

1. He's never done that.

2. Lions throw the ball more.

3. I'm good with Aaron Rodgers.

 

[Mitchrapp]

1. He's never done that.

2. Lions throw the ball more.

3. I'm good with Aaron Rodgers.

You think its an anomoly, never to be dupicated? Lol. First full season not so bad.

 

[wolverine304]

This year Romo has a better avg. 7.9yrds to 7.2yrds. Also has a better rating.

The years when Romo has thrown a lot he gets about 4,300yrds. One of the years with 36tds. And still with a high rating.

 

[lions2011]

This year Romo has a better avg. 7.9yrds to 7.2yrds. Also has a better rating.

The years when Romo has thrown a lot he gets about 4,300yrds. One of the years with 36tds. And still with a high rating.

gimme Stafford for the future.

 

[wolverine304]

I forgot how clutch stafford is known for in december.

Also if that's the case. You should have rivers in the elite group. Doesn't he have like a career of 20-3 record in december.

 

[lions2011]

I forgot how clutch stafford is known for in december.

Also if that's the case. You should have rivers in the elite group. Doesn't he have like a career of 20-3 record in december.

Im banking on Homo to LIGHT IT up this month.....

 

[lions2011]

although from a fantasy standpoint the Arizona performance was a fucking letdown....but that should have been expected Arizona doesn't allow many TDs through the air.

good thing Welker and Rice carried me to a win.

 

[cheeno]

although from a fantasy standpoint the Arizona performance was a fucking letdown.

good thing Welker and Rice carried me to a win.

From a gambling standpoint it was a steel toe to the wedding tackle.

 

[lions2011]

although from a fantasy standpoint the Arizona performance was a fucking letdown.

good thing Welker and Rice carried me to a win.

From a gambling standpoint it was a steel toe to the wedding tackle.

agreed...I had them giving 4.5 , it hurt.

 

[cheeno]

From a gambling standpoint it was a steel toe to the wedding tackle.

agreed...I had them giving 4.5 , it hurt.

Paired them with gifts Carolina (2.7 odds) and San Diego (1.8 odds) ruining what would have been a good payout.

 

[Mitchrapp]

Where do you guys bet at?

 

[lions2011]

agreed...I had them giving 4.5 , it hurt.

Paired them with gifts Carolina (2.7 odds) and San Diego (1.8 odds) ruining what would have been a good payout.

had...Indy -20.5
Denver - + .5
Jets +4.5
Dallas + 4.5
New orleans + 8.5

for 400 bucks.... :'(

 

[lions2011]

Mitch[/color]]Where do you guys bet at?

Pro Line.....

 

[cheeno]

Paired them with gifts Carolina (2.7 odds) and San Diego (1.8 odds) ruining what would have been a good payout.

had...Indy -20.5
Denver - + .5
Jets +4.5
Dallas + 4.5
New orleans + 8.5

for 400 bucks.... :'(

Nice calls, my ticket was around 4 bills as well. Indy even with the -20.5 scared me but that is such a huge spread. Was going to swap the Cowboys for the Jets on my ticket (slightly better odds, what I though were a pretty equal chance of winning barely favoring Dallas) but was talked out of it.

I bet proline as well (I live/work in Windsor right now) and
Bet 365 which is a good gambling site.

 

[beez]

Paired them with gifts Carolina (2.7 odds) and San Diego (1.8 odds) ruining what would have been a good payout.

had...Indy -20.5
Denver - + .5
Jets +4.5
Dallas + 4.5
New orleans + 8.5

for 400 bucks.... :'(

I'm confused....


Indy +20.5
Denver -.5
Jets -4.5
Dallas -4.5
and NO -8.5?

I think thats what you meant.

 

[lions2011]

had...Indy -20.5
Denver - + .5
Jets +4.5
Dallas + 4.5
New orleans + 8.5

for 400 bucks.... :'(

I'm confused....


Indy +20.5
Denver -.5
Jets -4.5
Dallas -4.5
and NO -8.5?

I think thats what you meant.

ya I look at it the other way when Im talking + meaning fav's

 

[beez]

I'm confused....


Indy +20.5
Denver -.5
Jets -4.5
Dallas -4.5
and NO -8.5?

I think thats what you meant.

ya I look at it the other way when Im talking + meaning fav's

I'm still kind of confused but I know who you bet on at least. lol

 

[tonyballs]

You think that's bad?? My bets should have been money in the bank..........

I had.....

Miami -2.5
Indy +21.5
Buffalo -1.5
Denver -.5
NO -9.5

$25 bet that "should" have won me $500. The Bills fucked me over big time....ugh.

 

[Mitchrapp]

See that's what I like, bet little to win a lot.