The Site seems bias to me looks to be run by some arm chair media watcher guy
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_Bias/Fact_Check
That could be a point, and when ever I come across any of these various media bias raters-Snopes and so forth-it does occur to me to wonder if they’re biased themselves.
But there’s one thing for sure-in many instances Wikipedia itself is absolutely biased-Entries can be created and written and edited by pretty much anybody in the public, and often the entries are created and editorialized by people with an agenda.
I know this firsthand from the entry for the Rolling Stones late great side guy sax player Bobby Keys.
His daughter was a longtime friend of mine and her mother, who also died just about a year before Bobby, Is not listed as her mother in the Wikipedia entry. I changed it several times and whom ever denied that she is her mother kept changing it back.
I would imagine it’s the bitch who Bobby was married to at the time he died who always had a vendetta against all of Bobby’s previous wives-And like most rock ‘n’ roll stars he had a few of them.
Now, somethings in Wikipedia are accurate and objective, but other things are pure bullshit.
So the last source that I would ever count on to be unbiased would be Wikipedia. I would rather trust Alex Jones.
EDIT: Forgot to mention, I looked up a number of Media ratings for Media that I’m pretty familiar with, And media bias fact check rates them all generally pretty much the way I would rate them.
EDIT:
This is a Wikipedia entry I created myself for my own set tire website that I used to write. For various reasons I haven’t been doing it all the way still on the name and I probably should get my ass back in gear and stop wasting all my brilliance and genius for only those here on the DSF.
-Just To clarify I own the name to the.com. There are a couple of other people publishing something they call the Disassociated Press under the .org and the.net and And various others possible.
