Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Lions offense moving to no huddle

The thing about fumbles is that our leading rusher, recent free agent has a fumbling problem and has most of his career. How does that change..? You can't cut him, it's been happening since he got to the NFL. You just have to take his 4-5 fumbles a year and move on..

Cut it by 1 from Bush could matter for an extra win or loss though. 3 lost instead of 4. Acutally if you look at Bush, 4 lost fumbles is the most of his entire career. 2 lost each year in Miami on 200 carries. The luck of the Lions get him to lose almost every fumble that hit the turf. In Miami, had 4 each year but only lost 2 each year. Bounce of the ball.

Bell 2 fumbles in a blizzard. Can you cut those out. Stafford/Raiola blizzard fumble. The fumble by Sam Martin on a fake FG. Surely you can cut that down. The Durham crazy fumble? Just get Durham off the field. Pettigrew had one week 1 and we though, here we go again but then he didn't lose another.

You'll never cut it to zero but you can cut them down by 5(10 fumbles) and be on the right side of 3 close games.
 
lol cause I care what some douchebag 247 post person thinks. you never have anything useful to say. youre like booger junior. im a pessimist and negative for a reason...the lions aren't good. LKP is an optimis for god knows why. Youre just a fucking moron...
if you're going to insult somebody about their intelligence, at least learn how to spell.


you're just a narcissistic POS with no life responding to any positive thing with multiple negatives.

see? it's easy to be insulting on a message board, loser!
 
Last edited:
Cut it by 1 from Bush could matter for an extra win or loss though. 3 lost instead of 4. Acutally if you look at Bush, 4 lost fumbles is the most of his entire career. 2 lost each year in Miami on 200 carries. The luck of the Lions get him to lose almost every fumble that hit the turf. In Miami, had 4 each year but only lost 2 each year. Bounce of the ball.

Bell 2 fumbles in a blizzard. Can you cut those out. Stafford/Raiola blizzard fumble. The fumble by Sam Martin on a fake FG. Surely you can cut that down. The Durham crazy fumble? Just get Durham off the field. Pettigrew had one week 1 and we though, here we go again but then he didn't lose another.

You'll never cut it to zero but you can cut them down by 5(10 fumbles) and be on the right side of 3 close games.

Why would he cut it by one? He had what, 1100 or so rush attempts in his career and 26 fumbles. That's just him, it's not bad luck or circumstances it's the fact he can't hold on to the ball, never has been. This is not one bad year or off year it's just what he does.

And 4 is not most, last 3 years 4 twice, 5 once - and 7 in an earlier year. That's consistent.
 
Last edited:
And the reason I used total fumbles rather than just lost fumbles because you said numerous times it's luck if you recover your own fumble.
 
And the reason I used total fumbles rather than just lost fumbles because you said numerous times it's luck if you recover your own fumble.

http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/stats/_/id/9588/reggie-bush

Fumbles lost is all that matters though. He had 5 hit the turf and lost 4. Really 6 though as they count the Arizona game fumble to Stafford. He'll probably but 4-5 on the turf but that doesn't mean the Lions will lose 4 or 5 fumbles. Like I said, I'll be happy if we lose only 3 next year if he puts 5 on the ground. 60% loss rate is normal luck.
 
And also I don't expect it go to 0 or 4-5 fumbles. I'll take 10 lost, 2 less from Bell(no blizzard), 1 less from Bush, Durham not playing and no fake FGs. That's 5 less fumbles.


10 fumbles lost and like 16 picks from Stafford. Lions would be golden with only 26 turnovers allowed with how well they move the ball and make stops.
 
The reason why I stated it was when you've mentioned on how unlucky we were when the other team fumbled and got it back. So in essence we were luck we got some of his fumbles back. So it all evens out..
 
The reason why I stated it was when you've mentioned on how unlucky we were when the other team fumbled and got it back. So in essence we were luck we got some of his fumbles back. So it all evens out..

We were not lucky. 80% loss rate is not lucky. 75% for Bell.

Stafford's fumbles on snaps in the blizzard make the recovery rate look better than it actually was.

When the ball was in play and the Lions fumbled, 80% of the time they didn't get it back. Terrible luck.

Plus they had less than a 50% recovery rate when they forced a fumble on defense.
 
18 forced fumbles against Detroit lost 15. Terrible luck.
Detroit forced 14 only got 7. Bad luck again.

That 8 fumble swing can cause 3 extra losses.
 
When another team fumbled you mentioned they were lucky they recovered their own fumble, why aren't we lucky?
 
We were lucky in 2011. 17 forced in 2011, recovered 13. So yes 3 more forced in 2011 compared to 2013. 76% recovery rate compared to 50%


12 forced against us in 2011, only lost 7. And 6 less put on the turf in 2011 compared to 2013. 58% loss rate compared to 83%


But much better recovery rates in 2011 on both sides.
 
Last edited:
Get the recovery rate for the Lions in the 70-80% range or drop the loss rate to 50-60%. Either one. That's huge in close losses.
 
if you're going to insult somebody about their intelligence, at least learn how to spell.


you're just a narcissistic POS with no life responding to any positive thing with multiple negatives.

see? it's easy to be insulting on a message board, loser!

why are you and kmd still here? go away...were trying to talk football. All you 2 want to do is comment on me.....I have a wife....I don't need you 2 on my jock so much. You have 60 posts and 40 of them are about me. shoo fly.
 
Last edited:
I think the hires of Caldwell and Lombardi bode well for Stafford since I think Linehan didn't really force him to focus on fundamentals. IF (the key word) IF we get a truly focused Stafford like we had in 2011 (even though he had some knucklehead plays then too) this is a team that is a real playoff team. Take away the dumb stuff from this offense, like being to conservative with a lead, throwing off his back foot and fumbles then this team may have something. The defense showed it had real potential especially if we stop being so predictable and can add another playmaker either at OLB or Corner. I think this could be an 11 win team. But they need to clean up the mental part of it. Fumbles, drops and interceptions are mostly mental.
 
lol cause I care what some douchebag 247 post person thinks. you never have anything useful to say. youre like booger junior. im a pessimist and negative for a reason...the lions aren't good. LKP is an optimis for god knows why. Youre just a fucking moron...

There you go again thinking that a post count has anything to do with knowing fuck all about the Lions...
 
why are you and kmd still here? go away...were trying to talk football. All you 2 want to do is comment on me.....I have a wife....I don't need you 2 on my jock so much. You have 60 posts and 40 of them are about me. shoo fly.

Bro, if you're trying to talk football why the fuck are you here? YOU KNOW NOTHING. The only thing you are kind of knowledgeable on is the draft. Sorry I don't spend my life glued to a fucking forum posting multiple times on every fucking topic spouting such god awful nonsense that you seriously make me not want to come here because you bitch and moan about everything. I've been a member of this forum as long as you have, but I guess I'm sorry for having a life and only posting once in a while. MY BAD. Guess that makes me a piece of shit for having such low post count. I'm not saying you don't have a life but I seriously doubt someone as negative and bitchy and as much time as you spend on here that you would...Just because you have more posts than me DOES NOT mean you KNOW ANYTHING more than I do about football. And that Mr. Negative, is a fucking fact.
 
Last edited:
Bro, if you're trying to talk football why the fuck are you here? YOU KNOW NOTHING. The only thing you are kind of knowledgeable on is the draft. Sorry I don't spend my life glued to a fucking forum posting multiple times on every fucking topic spouting such god awful nonsense that you seriously make me not want to come here because you bitch and moan about everything. I've been a member of this forum as long as you have, but I guess I'm sorry for having a life and only posting once in a while. MY BAD. Guess that makes me a piece of shit for having such low post count. I'm not saying you don't have a life but I seriously doubt someone as negative and bitchy and as much time as you spend on here that you would...Just because you have more posts than me DOES NOT mean you KNOW ANYTHING more than I do about football. And that Mr. Negative, is a fucking fact.

I know I know more than you about football cause you NEVER FUCKING talk about football. You just post about other people all the FUCKING time cause you suck at life lol. I make you not want to come here anymore?....have at it bro....see if I care if you come here anymore. Not like any of us will miss any of your brilliant football dialogue considering you never even talk about the game. That's fucking sad that I effect your life like that lol....stop kidding yourself that you have a life if some guy on the sports forum bothers you lmao. shoo fly....get off my nuts.
 
Last edited:
There you go again thinking that a post count has anything to do with knowing fuck all about the Lions...

when did I say that? I said KMD knows nothing....big difference. He has 247 posts about bullshit. EVery once in awhile hell suck on Staffords dick....but he doesn't ever say anything worthwhile why he thinks that way.
 
Back
Top