MAIZEandBLUE09 said:Jever4321 said:Getting the fish to take the bait IS the skill. Come on man you are sounding more ignorant than usual. There is a reason some people are more successful fishing and hunting and it sure isn't luck. It's skill. Fisherman know currents and structure, water temperature, depth, sun light, barometric pressure, etc... Hunters understand animal behavior, wind, breeding rituals, etc. It's mostly knowledge and skill with a little sprinkle of luck.
That is not always true at all. Let's go fishing at a lake - you can use Rapalas and I'll use some worms - and we'll see who can catch more fish.
As I stated in the very first response to this - if I go to Alaska to hunt, sure I probably want a guide. If I'm in SE Michigan - probably not needed. If I'm going deep sea fishing - I'll probably need a guide that knows the area and where the fish are. If I'm on the huron river - probably not. If you know the basics about fishing (fish like to hide in weed beds, by dead trees and around cover) you can be just as successful as anyone using live bait. It's when you get into using fake lures that you start running into the more skilled aspect of fishing. Sure knowing what lure fits the right occasion is key. But using live bait, like a worm, works in almost any situation. In fact - growing up, we always thought it was cheating because that's what my dad told us lol.
First you say fishing takes no skill and you can do just as well with live bait as with a fake lure. Then you 180 abruptly and admit that there is skill to it and that using a fake lure is "cheating." Can you get your act together and post something coherent? LOL it's like debating a dog chasing it's own tail, no idea where it's headed.