Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Northwestern game

I don’t care what the spread is next week, bet your mortgage on penn state
 
Warner and Bollman need to be fired immediately. No excuse for this performance. None.
 
What the hell is even wrong with LJ? He’s been a game time decision for a month now
 
Can’t wait to see McSorley bend us over next week. Whatever the spread pick PSU
 
Also can’t wait to put in for Quick Lane Bowl tickets at Ford Field, my only hope is MSU is eligible to play with 5 or 6 wins
 
Nobody over center and that putz doesn?t sneak it!!!

he wasn't getting there from the 2 - the middle linebacker was right there. we score 1 TD from the red zone all day against a shit NW team - and that one came off of good field position from the interception.

Lewerke is not the problem - it's the o-line, warner and the defensive secondary.

This was pathetic - flat out embarrassing.
 
NW is not as bad as their record...

maybe not, but they're not good either. they lost close games to dook and akron. their best loss is to an overrated michigan team - yes they should have lost by more but uofm has their problems as well.

this is not a top 25 teams, it's not even a good team.
 
NW's QB is legit. they have one of the better coaches in the conference.

MSU probably shouldn't have lost this game, but it's not that bad of a loss
 
maybe not, but they're not good either. ....

I never said they were-

awww, well, I know you're hurting, so let me just indulge you here:

"I am saying Northwestern is a good team. Probably the second best team in the whole league after Michigan, which is not overrated."
 
he wasn't getting there from the 2 - the middle linebacker was right there. we score 1 TD from the red zone all day against a shit NW team - and that one came off of good field position from the interception.

Lewerke is not the problem - it's the o-line, warner and the defensive secondary.

This was pathetic - flat out embarrassing.

It was all of those things AND Lewerke! He?s playing scared
 
NW's QB is legit. they have one of the better coaches in the conference.

MSU probably shouldn't have lost this game, but it's not that bad of a loss

I don't know a single NW alum who think Fitzgerald is a good coach, let alone one of the best in the conference.

It's a terrible loss - at home, no production in the red zone, give up 3 big plays for TDs, no running game, can't protect the QB against a bunch of kids who Dantonio wouldn't even recruit...
 
Last edited:
I thought Dantonio was a Cornerback expert? We have been torched game after game this year. So bad. This team is average all around. 7 wins is realistic. If Dave Warner and Bollman don’t lose their job this year than I have lost all faith in Dantonio.
 
Last edited:
It was all of those things AND Lewerke! He?s playing scared

3 TDs given up by the secondary of 21, 34 and 77 yards. It's a pretty tall order to expect Lewerke to make up for that and more with the o-line he's working with.
 
I never said they were-

awww, well, I know you're hurting, so let me just indulge you here:

"I am saying Northwestern is a good team. Probably the second best team in the whole league after Michigan, which is not overrated."

first of all, I didn't say you said or thought that. I simply stated that they're still bad regardless of how much better they are than their record. But since you bring it up, Mr. football genius (/s), what exactly did you mean by "Northwestern is not as bad as their record?" Did you mean they're bad, but they're not super bad?

Do you really think it's that big of a leap to think by "not as bad as they're record" you meant they're actually a good team? And should it be assumed that by "good team" that means they're top 2 in the conference? if I'm to assume that, then obviously you think uofm, isn't a good team because they're not the other top 2 team.

My 7 year old daughter makes more sense than you when she's talking about football.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top