Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Pettigrew a potential draft day trade target?

That's exactly the point Ink. That's why so many of us are so down on this organization.

SO many other needs that were staring them in the face. The Lions went out and took a luxury at #10. There's no other way to define it. A pass-catching TE that's basically a TE in name only. It was an arrogant, Millen pick.
 
That's exactly the point Ink. That's why so many of us are so down on this organization.

SO many other needs that were staring them in the face. The Lions went out and took a luxury at #10. There's no other way to define it. A pass-catching TE that's basically a TE in name only. It was an arrogant, Millen pick.

Can't say I am down on the organization. I am down on the pick.

Every team makes picks that don't work out for a variety of reasons. I said it then, and I say it now... the coaching staff stated they had four "blue chip" rated prospects in the draft, and they drafted one of them.

I think their evaluation was off, but you really can't ask a staff to pass up on their ratings. When teams start ignoring their scouting reports for whatever reason, you're in serious shit.

I also said if this moves us away from Droptimus Prime, I'd be fine with it, and there's talk of Pettigrew being traded, so maybe...

But when you look at the body of the last two drafts, it's been more good than bad too. I'm still very high on Van Noy, and still think Swanson is going to be a very good center in the league. Lawson looked fantastic from what we saw of him, but there's less footage there than the Zapruder film. Webster looks like he can contribute and maybe become a starter, ala Willie Young, and Reid is developmental, but shows promise. TJ Jones has ball skills.

The only clear miss was Nate Freese, and he was a 7th round pick, they usually don't work out.

Was Ebron a reach at #10. The books so far would say yes. I feel he was a reach. But I also don't see "bust" written all over the kid, I just see someone not worth a #10, and maybe not even a first rounder. The rest of that draft was pretty good in my book.
 
Last edited:
We didn't need a CB or DT last year. We needed a future CB and DT but a 3rd option weapon was a higher need than both future CB/DT. We can get the CB/DT that in 2015 draft right now and I don't think we really need a DT. The rookie CB this year may not even play. Slay and Mathis are set, nickel is set with 3 guys.

Reiff,Waddle,Lucas. Set. Could upgrade but can do well with those players.
Bell/Riddick. Set. Could upgrade but can do well with those players.
Slay/Mathis/3 nickels. Set. Could add depth for outside CB.


Taking Ebron at 10 was the right choice. He was not a reach. Many had him rated in that area. Year 2 and beyond he has the talent to be a real asset for this team.
 
We didn't need a CB or DT last year. We needed a future CB and DT but a 3rd option weapon was a higher need than both future CB/DT. We can get the CB/DT that in 2015 draft right now and I don't think we really need a DT. The rookie CB this year may not even play. Slay and Mathis are set, nickel is set with 3 guys.

Reiff,Waddle,Lucas. Set. Could upgrade but can do well with those players.
Bell/Riddick. Set. Could upgrade but can do well with those players.
Slay/Mathis/3 nickels. Set. Could add depth for outside CB.


Taking Ebron at 10 was the right choice. He was not a reach. Many had him rated in that area. Year 2 and beyond he has the talent to be a real asset for this team.

Do you understand that we do not have a starting LG? Depth draft...ha. This team has lots of needs.

I normally don't respond to trolls. Your act is tired. Please use your knowledge of football for a engaging discussion rather than overly homeristic trolling.
 
It's frustrating. I've said before, he'd be a great contributor to the board if he didn't act this way.
 
It's frustrating. I've said before, he'd be a great contributor to the board if he didn't act this way.

Doubt it. Even if it is a big troll fest he believes it all now.
 
Last edited:
Do you understand that we do not have a starting LG? Depth draft...ha. This team has lots of needs.

I normally don't respond to trolls. Your act is tired. Please use your knowledge of football for a engaging discussion rather than overly homeristic trolling.

Sims or Blalock will be added. It's a complete depth/build future draft.

CB, RB, OT set. Could upgrade with youth but clearly set with starters. LG will be set clearly.
 
Because he knows the system I guess?? Which is the dumbest thing ever, because the starter doesn't even know the system.
 
Because he knows the system I guess?? Which is the dumbest thing ever, because the starter doesn't even know the system.

That's just a poor excuse. I rather have Tebow, honestly, we could just run him once or twice. Orvlosky is useless..
 
Dan O went 2-3 with that bad Indy team. He was the best of the 2008 bunch by far.

He's worth something. And Moore might win the job anyway.
 
I still don't understand why fans complain about backup QBs on a team with a guaranteed #1 starter.

Though I know some fans have a ridiculous fantasy that a backup is going to challenge a $20MM QB. :lmao:

Even if it's just for insurance purposes, how much are you willing to commit (draft pick or money) to a guy who will likely never see the field?
 
There isn't a QB in this draft who can challenge Stafford for the next 3 years. Stafford is a good QB. He's clearly the guy to lead us to the Super Bowl.
 
There isn't a QB in this draft who can challenge Stafford for the next 3 years. Stafford is a good QB. He's clearly the guy to lead us to the Super Bowl.

let's see if he can beat a winning team on the road...or win a playoff game, before you declare that "He's clearly the guy to lead us to the Super Bowl"
 
Last edited:
let's see if he can beat a winning team on the road...or win a playoff game, before you declare that "He's clearly the guy to lead us to the Super Bowl"


He beat Dallas last year. Refs messed that one up. He's played well enough to beat many playoff teams and many teams with winning records on the road.
 
He beat Dallas last year. Refs messed that one up. He's played well enough to beat many playoff teams and many teams with winning records on the road.

no...he did not beat Dallas last year. They lost that game. He had a chance to beat them. The Lions got the ball back with 2:32 left in the game but he could not lead them to the TD that they needed.
 
I still don't understand why fans complain about backup QBs on a team with a guaranteed #1 starter.

Though I know some fans have a ridiculous fantasy that a backup is going to challenge a $20MM QB. :lmao:

Even if it's just for insurance purposes, how much are you willing to commit (draft pick or money) to a guy who will likely never see the field?

THIS ^ ... so true.

I don't care who your backup is at QB, at the point your starter has gone down and the backup is starting, your season has just gone down hill fast.

No team out there has a backup good enough, so how much cheddar do you put into a player you hope will never ever play?
 
Back
Top