- Thread Author
- #1
Not a great draft class but worse team ever and we pick 5th, lol.
By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!
Get StartedI watched more this past season than I've watched in years and they were terrible. Absolutely dreadful.The last 2 years they shut guys down to lose more games. Fuck them, it's karma
Do you really believe it prevents tanking? I'm not sure it does - every year there's multiple teams that lose 60+ games. Either they're tanking, so it doesn't prevent it, or they're just terrible and then it's a random thing.It's a crap shoot of a draft anyway, but yeah, it's cool that the NBA is trying to prevent tanking, but play in teams probably shouldn't be getting the #1 pick.
The Pistons were a terrible team that wasn’t tanking. I’m fine with them not getting the top pick because they were the worst. I just don’t like that their chances at getting 5 is better than getting 1-3.Do you really believe it prevents tanking? I'm not sure it does - every year there's multiple teams that lose 60+ games. Either they're tanking, so it doesn't prevent it, or they're just terrible and then it's a random thing.
Well it makes it so teams tanking still don't have a good shot at pick 1. Worst record only has a 50/50 shot at even picking in the top 4, like 14% shot at 1.Do you really believe it prevents tanking? I'm not sure it does - every year there's multiple teams that lose 60+ games. Either they're tanking, so it doesn't prevent it, or they're just terrible and then it's a random thing.
I agree with the last part. But explain to me why Cade and Duren were barely playing games the last 2 months if they were tanking on top of being bad. They finished the season with a rotation of guys that weren't even on the roster at the beginning and it wasn't from injuries.The Pistons were a terrible team that wasn’t tanking. I’m fine with them not getting the top pick because they were the worst. I just don’t like that their chances at getting 5 is better than getting 1-3.
3 seems fair. I agree there.Well it makes it so teams tanking still don't have a good shot at pick 1. Worst record only has a 50/50 shot at even picking in the top 4, like 14% shot at 1.
Having said that, I still think the worst team should be no lower than 3.
Do you really believe it prevents tanking? I'm not sure it does - every year there's multiple teams that lose 60+ games. Either they're tanking, so it doesn't prevent it, or they're just terrible and then it's a random thing.
They lost 28 straight games, they were a terrible team. I’m sure they weren’t tanking all of those games also. I’m not sure they have any players that is actually all star caliber on their roster.I agree with the last part. But explain to me why Cade and Duren were barely playing games the last 2 months if they were tanking on top of being bad. They finished the season with a rotation of guys that weren't even on the roster at the beginning and it wasn't from injuries.
This season for GLI, 27.3% from 3. We already have enough players who can't shoot.Saw a mock draft that showed you guys picking Buzelis. He's a player I've liked to draft in my 2K simulations. Super lengthy small forward. Kind of a less athletic Michael Porter Jr. Needs to get the three point shooting figured out.
This season for GLI, 27.3% from 3. We already have enough players who can't shoot.
Tell that to our current players.If there is anything a guy can learn, I would think it would be shooting the three.
Tell that to our current players.
Thus the problem with Weaver.You guys have drafted a lot of guys who were garbage shooters in college or wherever. Take Ausar Thompson for example
Thus the problem with Weaver.
Founded in 2011, Detroit Sports Forum is a community of fanatics dedicated to teams like the Lions, Tigers, Pistons, Red Wings, Wolverines, and more. We live and breathe Detroit sports!