We can still tag Fairley. But yes lose out on 4.2 million compared to the 5th year option. 9.7 million (right now, could go up next year) compared to 5.5 million. And letting Suh walk we get about 4 million more in cap room in 2015 compared to what we have committed now (13 million (this changes with a long term deal) down to 9 million dead money if he walks). And then of course you could lower Fairley's franchise number if you get a long term deal by July 15.
I'd rather give Suh a long term deal than Fairley still despite the 2016 cap room and 3rd round comp pick (2016) that would come. People seem to be taking Suh's production for granted.
Franchising Fariely would put us at 134 million committed. Then we have the 1.9 carryover so we would be under the current cap. This cap number could rise over 133. Depends how much. Then you get 3.1 million cutting Jason Jones which gives wiggle room. Possible to franchise Fairley but not optimal.
I'd rather give Suh a long term deal than Fairley still despite the 2016 cap room and 3rd round comp pick (2016) that would come. People seem to be taking Suh's production for granted.
Franchising Fariely would put us at 134 million committed. Then we have the 1.9 carryover so we would be under the current cap. This cap number could rise over 133. Depends how much. Then you get 3.1 million cutting Jason Jones which gives wiggle room. Possible to franchise Fairley but not optimal.
Last edited: