Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Stafford and Gruden

Great QBs have had 17 in a year. You just need other stats too go with it.

this is true. The problem with Stafford is he has played 4 seasons (not counting the 2010 where he played 3 games) and these are his INT totals

20
16
17
17+?
 
this is true. The problem with Stafford is he has played 4 seasons (not counting the 2010 where he played 3 games) and these are his INT totals

20
16
17
17+?

Like I so said. Look at 2010. He completed 63.5% of his passes and had over 40 TD. By themselves 17 INT aren't terrible.
 
17 INT aren't bad for a season, if he was competing 65% of his passes it wouldn't look so bad. Yesterday was more misses to guys wide open. His 58% is 30th in the league.

Yeah. I agree the numbers don't look good. Lions do lead the league in drops, and how many of Staffords interceptions are deflections off wide receivers hand right to a db? I'm not trying to make excuses, just throwing it out there.
 
Like I so said. Look at 2010. He completed 63.5% of his passes and had over 40 TD. By themselves 17 INT aren't terrible.

actually, he only had 16 INTs that year. The other 3 years when he had 17 or more he didn't have good stats to go with the high INT numbers. 53%, 59.8% and 58%

Like I said....he has had one good season 5 years in and the Lions gave him a huge contract extension.
 
Last edited:
It's going to take another stud receiver to make Staffords numbers look better than he is. I don't think there is a worse qb in the league right now.
 
Yeah. I agree the numbers don't look good. Lions do lead the league in drops, and how many of Staffords interceptions are deflections off wide receivers hand right to a db? I'm not trying to make excuses, just throwing it out there.

The interception thrown to Bush last night was all Stafford. The ball was a 5 yard rocket thrown behind Bush. I would say the only receiver deflected int that wasn't Staffords fault was the one that ended the Tampa gsme.
 
It's going to take another stud receiver to make Staffords numbers look better than he is. I don't think there is a worse qb in the league right now.

That is just a short term solution. As far as worst QB in the league right now - you still got Eli.
 
It's going to take another stud receiver to make Staffords numbers look better than he is. I don't think there is a worse qb in the league right now.

Mike Evans. Along with CJ and Fauria and the catch radius of these guys is the a two car garage each. He can go on being as scattershot as fuck.
 
Mike Evans. Along with CJ and Fauria and the catch radius of these guys is the a two car garage each. He can go on being as scattershot as fuck.

as long as durham is off the field. a porn stars vagina can catch a football better than he can.
 
Yeah. I agree the numbers don't look good. Lions do lead the league in drops, and how many of Staffords interceptions are deflections off wide receivers hand right to a db? I'm not trying to make excuses, just throwing it out there.

Everyone has deflection type INT. Maybe not as much but nonetheless. Bottom line: you throw into the chest and the INT deflection don't happen.
 
Back
Top