Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Tigers 2021-2022 Free Agents Trades Rule 5 Arbitration Moves

https://totallytigers.wordpress.com/2022/02/21/player-poll-results/
PLAYER POLL RESULTS.
Totally Tigers

Over the weekend, Tiger fans were asked to name the top 5 players they will be watching most closely this coming season. Today, we?ve got the results ? and the patterns seen.

First, the responses ranked ? from those with the most votes to the fewest. I?ve divided it into categories with the first group receiving the largest chunk of votes cast, followed by the moderate recipients and then those with just a scattering of votes. The last group received just 1 vote each.
 
https://totallytigers.wordpress.com/2022/02/22/watercooler-wednesday-26/
WATERCOOLER WEDNESDAY.
Totally Tigers

Today, another opportunity for readers to discuss the hottest topics in a forum where thoughtful dialog and a variety of opinions are welcomed.

Let?s create some running conversational threads. And for those of you still going into offices, here?s a question to take with you ? or use via Zoom calls ? as you talk to your co-workers.

Here is today?s hot topic.
The continued lockout by MLB owners could potentially cause several problems related to the development of players.

Both issues are tied to spring training.

If the Tigers? time in Florida is shortened, players may not have enough opportunities to properly get conditioned. With the Covid-shortened year, we saw a rash of injuries throughout MLB that were linked to them not having enough time to get ready for the season.

The second issue concerns players on the 40-man roster, which includes prospects who hope to make the roster this year or in the near future. Due to lockout rules, they cannot use team facilities or be in contact with managers and coaches. They also cannot be allowed to join their minor league facility and train/play with them.

A delayed/shortened spring training will give them fewer opportunities to show their MLB manager what they are capable of doing for the team.

For your own analysis, here is the official 40-man roster for the Tigers:

https://www.mlb.com/tigers/roster/40-man

The prospects on this roster are in limbo until a new CBA is signed. The inherent risk is that they may fall behind in their development.

As it regards the Tigers, which of these 2 scenarios would be worse for the development and future performance of the team?

If spring training is shortened, which scenario would be worse for the Tigers' development and future?

1. Increased risk of injury to players.

2. Less development of prospects on 40-man roster.

VOTE
 
https://totallytigers.wordpress.com/2022/03/01/watercooler-wednesday-27/
WATERCOOLER WEDNESDAY.
Totally Tigers

Today, another opportunity for readers to discuss the hottest topics in a forum where thoughtful dialog and a variety of opinions are welcomed.

Let?s create some running conversational threads. And for those of you still going into offices, here?s a question to take with you ? or use via Zoom calls ? as you talk to your co-workers.

Here is today?s hot topic.
One of the biggest issues under discussion between players and owners has been the Competitive Balance Tax or ?luxury tax? as it is commonly known.

Currently, there is no minimum payroll for teams while there is a de facto salary cap of $210 million. Teams that go above this figure pay a graduated tax on their payroll.

Last year, only 1 team spent over the luxury tax limit. Meanwhile, 12 teams spent under $100 mill. Four of those teams spent $58 mill or less. The average MLB payroll now sits at $132 million.

Players have proposed establishing a payroll floor so teams will be forced to assemble a competitive roster. They have also argued that the luxury tax limit be raised to $245 million.

Owners do not want a payroll floor while also stating that they want to keep nearly the same ceiling. They believe that raising payroll will give the richest teams an unfair competitive advantage.

Players believe that the yearly drop (for the past 6 years) in payroll is creating uncompetitive teams while also preventing their middle class of players (those no longer under team control and seeking their first real contracts) from receiving fair offers.

We know that owners will never agree to a payroll floor, but what about a new ceiling?

Should teams be able to spend more than $210 million without penalty?

Will raising the ceiling inspire more spending?

Will a new ceiling force teams with the smallest payrolls to increase theirs?

What do you think?

Should the MLB payroll ceiling be raised?

1. No, keep it at $210 million.

2. Yes, raise it.

VOTE
 
Back
Top