- Thread Author
- #961
![totallytigers.wordpress.com](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Ftotallytigers.wordpress.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2022%2F10%2Fgiphy.gif&hash=c4141c67b510228c55665ba0269a346d&return_error=1)
THOUGHTFUL THURSDAY
Spring training may be here but there are still free agents out there waiting to be signed. Some of them still without teams due to perceived talent, not finding the right fit or asking for t…
Totally Tigers
Spring training may be here but there are still free agents out there waiting to be signed. Some of them still without teams due to perceived talent, not finding the right fit or asking for too much money.
But for many of them, it’s about the length of the contract. Teams are much more willing to put a few extra dollars into each year’s salary but they are becoming increasingly concerned over the number of years that player will be on the roster.
It was the biggest speed bump when it came to Pete Alonso’s new contract. And it’s the primary reason why Alex Bregman remained unsigned until yesterday.
The Detroit Tigers certainly have had their share of contracts that became painful in the end even with first ballot Hall of Famer Miguel Cabrera. And currently they are suffering from the Javy Baez contract that still has 3 long years to go. Ironically, that contract was created right after Jordan Zimmermann’s horrible contract ended.
Alex Bregman has stated that he does not want a short-term contract and insists on one of at least 6 years. No team yet, including the Tigers, has acquiesced to those demands because of his current age and the concern over when his contract would end.
Recently, we’ve seen the team lock down young prospects like Colt Keith to 6-9 year contracts. It’s an advantage in which the player would still be young at the conclusion unlike the free agent who is already older.
Which brings us to ask fans whether the Tigers should ever again offer a long-term contract (5 or more years) to a free agent?
Is it worth the risk? It is worth the reward? Are there better ways in which the organization can acquire some of the best talent without having to jeopardize their future?
What do you think?
Should the Tigers ever again offer a long-term contract (5+ yrs.) to a free agent?
1. Yes
2. Only one but it must be due to a unique situation.
3. No
VOTE