Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Ukraine

Then we continued to "poke the bear" for the last 8 years.

And there are NeoNazis in Ukraine. NO, the Ukrainian president isn't Neo Nazi, and the billionaire oligarch (Kolomoisky) who put him in power isn't either (he's also Jewish) but that same oligarch DID finance and back the NeoNazis in the Ukrainian army, like the Azov battalion.

We have Nazis here too. Esp. in Indiana. Not a reason Russia should invade us.

Thanks to the nukes, we can't fight the bear. The bear has to change on its own. Cutting them off economically and supporting whoever they blame their hardships on is pretty much the most we can do. Could split the world into 2 halves, 2 banking systems, two internets, maybe even a renewable-vs-fossil split if it carries on for decades. Hope not. But we can't fight and shouldn't appease, so poking the bear is all we've got. Makes China pretty important.
 
If your wife had people hacking all over her it is very likely that she had COVID but never showed any signs or symptoms. I read that 50% of people that had covid were never aware.


That could be true for sure we will never know for sure but were both tested after our vaccine and booster and had high anti bodies? Now maybe they were high before the vaccine I just don?t know. But I do believe the mask we wore made us less Susceptible to get colds and flus and other bad stuff besides Covid-19. It boggles my mind that some are against wearing a mask. I find it really strange that all can?t come together beat this crap. Mask seem like a easy ask to me.
 
We have Nazis here too. Esp. in Indiana. Not a reason Russia should invade us.

What logical fallacy does your argument come under?


False equivalency? You can't compare the Nazis in Mariupol/Ukraine to the dumbfucks in rural America. The former are battle-tested in combat, and armed & funded by big dollars and given military hardware, including by the US government, for the specific purpose of fighting Russia.

The Nazis in Indiana drag our own country down. Their existence is - if anything - in Russia's interest.

Thanks to the nukes, we can't fight the bear. The bear has to change on its own. Cutting them off economically and supporting whoever they blame their hardships on is pretty much the most we can do. Could split the world into 2 halves, 2 banking systems, two internets, maybe even a renewable-vs-fossil split if it carries on for decades. Hope not. But we can't fight and shouldn't appease, so poking the bear is all we've got. Makes China pretty important.

Having read all the evidence - including Op Eds written by our own intelligence agency officers and former State Dept. heads - that we KNEW Ukraine was a Russian satellite and trying to flip it into our camp & NATO was crossing a line with Russia. Hell, there's a clip now widely shared on twitter of Biden in 1997 saying this very thing in a speech.

So how are we appeasing them by not crossing a line here?



I think if you compared their argument, that by not invading Ukraine immediately in 2014, and by allowing Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Bulgaria, etc. into NATO, they were appeasing us... I'd find their argument a lot more persuasive just by glancing at a map.

I can't understand how you honestly still believe this sort of "shining beacon on a hill" bullshit, that by siding with the US, Ukraine would be better off. Prior to 2006... maybe? Hell, even prior to 2016 or so in Ukraine's specific case, I'd still agree. Now? Not at all, and in fact, I can't think of a single good foreign policy move we've done since Obama negotiated a nuclear deal with Iran, that we - of course - unilaterally reneged on, showing the world you can't trust us at all.

And I'm telling you, now in hindsight, after we "neoliberalized" them in 2014/2015 things got worse for the vast majority of Ukrainians. So there really shouldn't be any argument on this.

The only ones who benefitted in any way were ones that knew how to play the game and get Western/NGO or US government money... or Americans who knew how to exploit those getting handouts from western governments, kinda like our President's son.
 
What logical fallacy does your argument come under?


False equivalency? You can't compare the Nazis in Mariupol/Ukraine to the dumbfucks in rural America. The former are battle-tested in combat, and armed & funded by big dollars and given military hardware, including by the US government, for the specific purpose of fighting Russia.

The Nazis in Indiana drag our own country down. Their existence is - if anything - in Russia's interest.

Equivalency relative to the reaction of Russia. Wikipedia says they're down to 900 people as of 2022. Why are they recognized as official National Guard by the government and supported by the US? Beats me. But it doesn't remotely justify this invasion.
 
Having read all the evidence - including Op Eds written by our own intelligence agency officers and former State Dept. heads - that we KNEW Ukraine was a Russian satellite and trying to flip it into our camp & NATO was crossing a line with Russia. Hell, there's a clip now widely shared on twitter of Biden in 1997 saying this very thing in a speech.

So how are we appeasing them by not crossing a line here?



I think if you compared their argument, that by not invading Ukraine immediately in 2014, and by allowing Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Bulgaria, etc. into NATO, they were appeasing us... I'd find their argument a lot more persuasive just by glancing at a map.

I can't understand how you honestly still believe this sort of "shining beacon on a hill" bullshit, that by siding with the US, Ukraine would be better off. Prior to 2006... maybe? Hell, even prior to 2016 or so in Ukraine's specific case, I'd still agree. Now? Not at all, and in fact, I can't think of a single good foreign policy move we've done since Obama negotiated a nuclear deal with Iran, that we - of course - unilaterally reneged on, showing the world you can't trust us at all.

And I'm telling you, now in hindsight, after we "neoliberalized" them in 2014/2015 things got worse for the vast majority of Ukrainians. So there really shouldn't be any argument on this.

The only ones who benefitted in any way were ones that knew how to play the game and get Western/NGO or US government money... or Americans who knew how to exploit those getting handouts from western governments, kinda like our President's son.


It ain't about any shining beacon on a hill. A bad democracy is better than a good authoritarian state. Every time. We didn't neoliberalize anyone. Nobody wants to live that way.
 
It ain't about no shining beacon on a hill. A bad democracy is better than a good authoritarian state. Every time. We didn't neoliberalize nobody. Don?t nobody wants to live that way.

FTFY.

Colloquial writing rule #1 don?t never use ?ain?t? without no double negative. EDITActually, without as many double negatives as possible. BT dubs love neoliberalze. I?m gonna say that I came up with it.
 
Last edited:
FTFY.

Colloquial writing rule #1 don?t never use ?ain?t? without no double negative. EDITActually, without as many double negatives as possible. BT dubs love neoliberalze. I?m gonna say that I came up with it.

I hope he knows that, and isn't going around North Carolina thinking he's "fitting in" by dropping an occasional "ain't" or "y'all" in there.
 
It ain't about any shining beacon on a hill. A bad democracy is better than a good authoritarian state. Every time. We didn't neoliberalize anyone. Nobody wants to live that way.

Ukraine was already a pretty bad democracy in 2014. as these things go, it may have been an even lousier democracy than ours
 
I hope he knows that, and isn't going around North Carolina thinking he's "fitting in" by dropping an occasional "ain't" or "y'all" in there.

It's fine. I'm surrounded by northern transplants whose y'alls are just as fake as mine.
 
I think if you compared their argument, that by not invading Ukraine immediately in 2014, and by allowing Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Bulgaria, etc. into NATO, they were appeasing us... I'd find their argument a lot more persuasive just by glancing at a map.

I'm still kind of surprised to read this. When nations join NATO, they don't become puppets of an American regime. If you want to leave NATO, you have to give a 1-year notice, and then you're out. That's it. Appease us? It's not remotely the same. NATO is not the problem. Authoritarianism is.
 
I'm still kind of surprised to read this. When nations join NATO, they don't become puppets of an American regime. If you want to leave NATO, you have to give a 1-year notice, and then you're out. That's it. Appease us? It's not remotely the same. NATO is not the problem. Authoritarianism is.

I'm astonished you believe this.
 
I do know that It?s pretty bad when one country invades a country that doesn?t want to live under your rule. I do not know how bad the Ukrainian people are. I am sure they have some good, bad, evil ect. What I do know is that Putin kills and tries to poison political opponents. Russia media seems way more controlled then Ukrainian media. They do not want to live under Putin it seems to me. Didn?t Joe get in trouble for something recently ?
Idk I don?t use Spotify . I see some of his stuff on YouTube.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top