- Thread Author
- #1
By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!
Get StartedYeah, we need a better closer than the best closer in baseball in 2011 for sure.
Seriously, Day 1 of the 2012 season, and the idiotic posts are just racking up.
Valverde did not close out 2011 very well at all
Valverde did not close out 2011 very well at all
Agree that the thread is ridiculous, but Valverde was not the best closer in 2011. I don't think that blown saves is the only criteria for a back end reliever, and Valverde was not near the top of any other stat. How a closer performs in close games is important, too.
Disclaimer - Valverde was solid last year, I'm not saying he was lousy.
Either did Cabrera, did he shit the bed too?
Seriously, we have a "sky is falling" post after a win.
SMH
He is suppose to not blow saves. Maybe a 1.8 era would look sexier but he did what he had to. And btw, look at his era when he was in a save situation. Very good.
Wins are wins. If you're tied in the ninth and lose, it counts the same as if you are a run ahead and lose.
Where is it written in stone that a closer is only supposed to "save games"? That's like saying a starting pitcher is only supposed to "win games". Certainly, you don't think that, right?
So last year, Miguel Valverde and Verlander sucked. Because they were bad in the playoffs.
So who you want, 20 starts 20-0 with 4.2 ERA. Or 20 starts, 6-14 2.87 era?
I'll play, too.
Would you rather have a closer with zero blown saves and a 2-12 record, or a closer with 5 blown saves but a 12-2 record? By your own statement, the first pitcher is the "better" closer.
Valverde did not close out 2011 very well at all
Sept/October reg season: .69 era, WHIP of .615.
Founded in 2011, Detroit Sports Forum is a community of fanatics dedicated to teams like the Lions, Tigers, Pistons, Red Wings, Wolverines, and more. We live and breathe Detroit sports!