Spartanmack
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2013
- Messages
- 17,538
Sometimes it isn't clear, trying to pin down what you're saying. Feels like backpeddling. Now the idiots are just the people that don't believe your specific take on her story.
Gimme a break. It's your specific take that you're trying to use to invalidate what I've been consistently saying all along. You're altering the tale from what's been told to find a possible scenario where this could have happened and it may not be stupid to believe it's possible. I haven't done that and I haven't changed my position nor will I - I haven't backpedaled a single step. The idiots are the ones who believe the story as it's been told. Even if you're arguing it's plausible that this happened to her and she shut up about it, maybe but I still think it's foolish to believe because she's not the only one who would have to be silent. She said there were other witnesses. If someone believe that the circumstances she described could have happened multiple times and not only she but EVERYONE involved would have remained silent then and for 30+ years after, they have to be pretty dumb.
Last edited: