Not that I want to sound like I agree with the crap LKP keeps leaking from his hole, but I do gotta say it's always struck me as odd the way the Stafford haters circle around the arguments to always be right.
When Stafford has played well, the argument is always "he doesn't win enough". And now we're using sacks, drops, etc... to argue why a QB who went .500 in his best season to date is the better QB.
Suddenly wins don't matter, all these other numbers do.
Two years ago Stafford was one of the least sacked QBs in the game, but after a year filled with offensive line injuries, suddenly we're talking about sacks like it's all on him.
To quote a popular internet saying... "haters gonna hate". No matter what the guy does, short of winning a Super Bowl (and maybe not even then) the people on this board that hate him are going to hate him, and are going to tailor every argument to whatever supports the conclusion that he sucks. And when that argument no longer works, they have a whole new argument that is a direct contradiction to the last argument.
He may be full of shit (he is) but at least LKP stays fairly consistent with his full of shit. I suppose it's not hard to do when you are always full of shit, but at least the guy maintains a cohesive argument and doesn't deviate every few months to change what is "relevant" to the conversation.