We all know that think tanks and social engineering orgs and NGOs are always projecting scenarios, but
this one from 2017 is just a little too prescient for my tastes. It's off by five years in its timing.
Here are a few excerpts:
"The concerns of African Americans were very different. [from Muslims] Distrust of new treatments, including vaccines, was not a new phenomenon among African American communities. The legacy of the Tuskegee syphilis experiments [which actually happened over 40 years ] and the fact that during the 2014 Ebola outbreak, experimental therapeutics were not made available to Thomas Eric Duncan (a Liberian traveler who had died of Ebola in Dallas, Texas), nor to many West African communities struck by Ebola, meant that many African Americans ? particularly those living in communities consuming media through local, traditional media platforms ? feared the possibility of being subjected to scientific experimentation." P 45
"Demographically, vaccination rates across the United States were mixed. Rates were high among Filipino-Americans, healthcare workers, families with young children, and individuals who identified themselves as Republicans. Rates were considerably lower among African Americans, Muslims, college students, and pocketed communities in places like San Francisco and Boston, where anti-vaccine sentiment was particularly high.
To reach members of these groups?which, with the exception of the pocketed communities, were largely spread throughout the country?the US government added a new, aggressive advertising campaign to its pro-vaccination efforts. This campaign provided targeted internet advertisements to individuals as they conducted web searches or visited anti-vaccination websites. If someone searched Google for ?Corovax [vaccine] side effects,? for example, a sidebar advertisement appeared on the results page explaining the benefits of the vaccine. Likewise, if someone wished to view the Kalocivir [vaccine] vomiting video on YouTube, they would first have to watch either a montage of pictures illustrating the effects of SPARS or a clip of Paul Farmer?s (read: Fauci) explanation of Corovax?s benefits." P 55
"While the federal government appeared to have appropriately addressed concerns around the acute side effects of Corovax, the long-term, chronic effects of the vaccine were still largely unknown.
Nearing the end of 2027, reports of new neurological symptoms began to emerge. After showing no adverse side effects for nearly a year, several vaccine recipients slowly began to experience symptoms such as blurry vision, headaches, and numbness in their extremities. Due to the small number of these cases, the significance of their association with Corovax was never determined. As of this writing in
2030, longitudinal studies initiated by the NIH at the beginning of the vaccination program have not reached the next round of data collection, so formal analysis on these symptoms has not yet been conducted. Furthermore, these cases arose from the initial cohort of vaccine recipients?those in high-risk populations, including those with other underlying health conditions?making it increasingly difficult to determine the extent to which these symptoms are associated with vaccination." P 59
If you read the whole study, some rather coincidental parallels emerge.
Finally:
"The very real possibility of a future SPARS pandemic necessitates continued commitment to vaccination programs as well as accurate, culturally appropriate, and timely communication from public health agencies across the planet. While the communication experiences of the SPARS pandemic of 2025-2028 offer some examples for how this communication can and should occur, they also identify practices that should be avoided, or at least modified, for responses to future public health emergencies." P67.
Ultimately, CNN calls this scenario a
"prediction!"
CNN HEADLINE:
Experts predicted a coronavirus pandemic years ago. Now it's playing out before our eyes.