Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Coronainsanity

it really is nuts.

The CDC waiving the mask "mandate" could prove to be a disaster.

it's dumb to call it a mandate to begin with, because for MONTHS here, you've been able to go eat inside a restaurant and take your mask off, basically as soon as you get to your table.

Now on top of that, you have all these retards who've been complaining about having to wear a mask all this time, and who are also "anti-vaxx" who will simply lie about having been vaccinated so they can do their walmart shopping or applebees gorging without a mask. ... i.e. we are so going to have another wave of this in a month or two, and it might be the worst one yet.

AND On top of ALL THAT, I read this comment today:
I have to keep repeating this: Pfizer and Moderna measured efficacy ONLY against serious infections and deaths. Pfizer didn?t even test participants regularly; its protocol asked them to call a nurse if they had symptoms and the nurse would decide if they needed to be tested. So Pfizer would never capture an asymptomatic case and could easily have missed mild ones.
So... there's a good chance even vaccinated people will keep getting sick (even if these are only mild cases), and since we just said they don't need to wear masks after they get their shots, they'll be potentially spreading it to everyone around them who is not vaccinated, which is like 50% of all American adults, and close to 100% of everyone under 18.

I'm going to keep wearing a mask.




I tweeted similar to that this morning...the response was uhh...disappointing.


Was watching "Morning Joe" earlier, he mentioned that he is going to continue to wear a mask on airplanes...b/c he believes that doing so will prevent his getting colds or the flu...uh-huh?


Got bad news for him...unless everyone else is wearing a mask...OR he is wearing a GENUINE N95 or KN95 mask, (there are many counterfeits and tested models who don't meet their mfg's claims for protection) his mask-wearing will fail.
 
it really is nuts.

The CDC waiving the mask "mandate" could prove to be a disaster.

it's dumb to call it a mandate to begin with, because for MONTHS here, you've been able to go eat inside a restaurant and take your mask off, basically as soon as you get to your table.

Now on top of that, you have all these retards who've been complaining about having to wear a mask all this time, and who are also "anti-vaxx" who will simply lie about having been vaccinated so they can do their walmart shopping or applebees gorging without a mask. ... i.e. we are so going to have another wave of this in a month or two, and it might be the worst one yet.

AND On top of ALL THAT, I read this comment today:
I have to keep repeating this: Pfizer and Moderna measured efficacy ONLY against serious infections and deaths. Pfizer didn?t even test participants regularly; its protocol asked them to call a nurse if they had symptoms and the nurse would decide if they needed to be tested. So Pfizer would never capture an asymptomatic case and could easily have missed mild ones.
So... there's a good chance even vaccinated people will keep getting sick (even if these are only mild cases), and since we just said they don't need to wear masks after they get their shots, they'll be potentially spreading it to everyone around them who is not vaccinated, which is like 50% of all American adults, and close to 100% of everyone under 18.

I'm going to keep wearing a mask.

Knock yourself out.

It?s going be to as ineffective and worthless as it was when it was mandatory.


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rvtbRfne3cA
 
I tweeted similar to that this morning...the response was uhh...disappointing.


Was watching "Morning Joe" earlier, he mentioned that he is going to continue to wear a mask on airplanes...b/c he believes that doing so will prevent his getting colds or the flu...uh-huh?


Got bad news for him...unless everyone else is wearing a mask...OR he is wearing a GENUINE N95 or KN95 mask, (there are many counterfeits and tested models who don't meet their mfg's claims for protection) his mask-wearing will fail.

Yeah, it?s still mandatory on airplanes.

Still mandatory, still ineffective and worthless.
 
Where did you perform your peer-reviewed studies to come to that conclusion?


b/c unless you have, your opinion holds no more value than anyone else's here.
 
Where did you perform your peer-reviewed studies to come to that conclusion?


b/c unless you have, your opinion holds no more value than anyone else's here.

I don?t know who this post is directed to.

But whomever it is, you?re right.

No one?s opinion holds any more value than anyone else?s here.
 
I am sure that Scarborough flies often enough to know if mask mandates have been lifted for airlines or not...and I am also sure that he was referring to wearing a mask long-term while flying in airplanes.
 
How much outrage will Joe face if the US experiences a massive uptick like India did. Sure there are higher % of vaxers in US, but not yet at herd immunity.

Will the Dems demand his impeachment? Is this how they plan to push reluctant vaxers to get vaxed sooner AND provide the path for ,la to become POTUS? Hmm, has the feeling of a soap opera being shot live where the lead (Biden) keeps flubbing lines causing everyone else to ad lib through the scene painfully. Is it really far fetched to think CDC said to him it could happen SOON (as in maybe this summer) and Joe being the daft idiot that he is just went on TV and said people can take off their masks now instead...cuz, ya know, it's kinda who he is.

Can you remotely imagine had Trump been re-elected and he said this at this point? OMG, the Dems would have unleashed their full fury that would make their prior reactions seem like the scenes in Frozen with the trolls blinking.
 
How much outrage will Joe face if the US experiences a massive uptick like India did. Sure there are higher % of vaxers in US, but not yet at herd immunity.

Will the Dems demand his impeachment? Is this how they plan to push reluctant vaxers to get vaxed sooner AND provide the path for ,la to become POTUS? Hmm, has the feeling of a soap opera being shot live where the lead (Biden) keeps flubbing lines causing everyone else to ad lib through the scene painfully. Is it really far fetched to think CDC said to him it could happen SOON (as in maybe this summer) and Joe being the daft idiot that he is just went on TV and said people can take off their masks now instead...cuz, ya know, it's kinda who he is.

Can you remotely imagine had Trump been re-elected and he said this at this point? OMG, the Dems would have unleashed their full fury that would make their prior reactions seem like the scenes in Frozen with the trolls blinking.




Trump wasn't impeached for his handling of the pandemic, however I am fairly certain that if Republicans regain control of the House and/or Senate in '22, they will find some reason or excuse to try to exact revenge for the former guy being impeached twice by the House in '19 and '20 while in office.
 
I am sure that Scarborough flies often enough to know if mask mandates have been lifted for airlines or not...and I am also sure that he was referring to wearing a mask long-term while flying in airplanes.

I didn?t see whatever he said.

I have no idea how often he flies and there is nothing I could care less about.

The mask mandate for vaccinated people in most situations was suspended literally yesterday.

I don?t know how often he would have flown since yesterday, probably not that many times - still couldn?t care less about anything.

Regardless of what he knows or doesn?t know, the mandate stays in effect for flying. That exception and the other exceptions to the suspension are delineated in the New York Times article I posted it #2737. Read them for your own edification or don?t, I don?t care.
 
I didn?t see whatever he said.

I have no idea how often he flies and there is nothing I could care less about.

The mask mandate for vaccinated people in most situations was suspended literally yesterday.

I don?t know how often he would have flown since yesterday, probably not that many times - still couldn?t care less about anything.

Regardless of what he knows or doesn?t know, the mandate stays in effect for flying. That exception and the other exceptions to the suspension are delineated in the New York Times article I posted it #2737. Read them for your own edification or don?t, I don?t care.




Yeah?



But if so, they why did you reply to my post?


For "satire's" sake?
 
How much outrage will Joe face if the US experiences a massive uptick like India did. Sure there are higher % of vaxers in US, but not yet at herd immunity.

Will the Dems demand his impeachment? Is this how they plan to push reluctant vaxers to get vaxed sooner AND provide the path for ,la to become POTUS? Hmm, has the feeling of a soap opera being shot live where the lead (Biden) keeps flubbing lines causing everyone else to ad lib through the scene painfully. Is it really far fetched to think CDC said to him it could happen SOON (as in maybe this summer) and Joe being the daft idiot that he is just went on TV and said people can take off their masks now instead...cuz, ya know, it's kinda who he is.

Can you remotely imagine had Trump been re-elected and he said this at this point? OMG, the Dems would have unleashed their full fury that would make their prior reactions seem like the scenes in Frozen with the trolls blinking.

I really gotta see that movie - I love Kristen Bell and Idina Menzel. It?s been something about watching a cartoon, I don?t know.

It wasn?t directly from old Joe but actually the CDC; and it?s purely political. Here, Chris Cuomo warns of a potential red team tsunami in the 2022 midterms if team blue doesn?t back off of its coronainsanity.

That interview was the night before yesterday, the day the CDC all but suspended mitigations for vaccinated people.
 
Yeah?



But if so, they why did you reply to my post?


For "satire's" sake?

Nope.

Just to state a fact.

The mask mandate is in effect for flying.

Whether Scarborough is aware of that or not changes nothing.

EDIT: Oh, also of course, to refer you to the source link to it #2737, should you choose to review it for your own knowledge and edification.

Because I am kindly and giving like that.
 
Last edited:
Nope.

Just to state a fact.

The mask mandate is in effect for flying.

Whether Scarborough is aware of that or not changes nothing.

EDIT: Oh, also of course, to refer you to the source link to it #2737, should you choose to review it for your own knowledge and edification.

Because I am kindly and giving like that.

Is Jon Voigt posting from your account today?
 
I don?t know who this post is directed to.

But whomever it is, you?re right.

No one?s opinion holds any more value than anyone else?s here.

definitely disagree here - I have a ranking system if you're interested - happy to share it but I suggest you come up with your own.
 
Last edited:
Trump wasn't impeached for his handling of the pandemic, however I am fairly certain that if Republicans regain control of the House and/or Senate in '22, they will find some reason or excuse to try to exact revenge for the former guy being impeached twice by the House in '19 and '20 while in office.

I'll take the other side of that bet. What do you want to put on it?
 
I'm not going to wear mine. The way I look at it, maybe we can kill off all of the "anti-vax" idiots and the liars that say they are vaccinated but are not. Fewer idiots in this country is a good thing:cheers:

that's only going to kill most of the fat and elderly idiots and they're going to die sooner than most anyway. The rest of us anti-vax idiots will maybe have the sniffles for a few days and be around to annoy you for the rest your lives - it will be especially annoying if there are long-term side effects from the vaccine all you pro-vax geniuses took for a virus that didn't really pose a threat to you.
 
Last edited:
that's only going to kill most of the fat and elderly idiots and they're going to die sooner than most anyway. The rest of us anti-vax idiots will maybe have the sniffles for a few days and be around to annoy you for the rest your lives - it will be especially annoying if there are long-term side effects from the vaccine all you pro-vax geniuses took for a virus that didn't really pose a threat to you.

Ironically, you can be an anti-vaxx idiot now because your parents weren't anti-vaxx idiots.
 
We all know that think tanks and social engineering orgs and NGOs are always projecting scenarios, but this one from 2017 is just a little too prescient for my tastes. It's off by five years in its timing.

Here are a few excerpts:

"The concerns of African Americans were very different. [from Muslims] Distrust of new treatments, including vaccines, was not a new phenomenon among African American communities. The legacy of the Tuskegee syphilis experiments [which actually happened over 40 years ] and the fact that during the 2014 Ebola outbreak, experimental therapeutics were not made available to Thomas Eric Duncan (a Liberian traveler who had died of Ebola in Dallas, Texas), nor to many West African communities struck by Ebola, meant that many African Americans ? particularly those living in communities consuming media through local, traditional media platforms ? feared the possibility of being subjected to scientific experimentation." P 45

"Demographically, vaccination rates across the United States were mixed. Rates were high among Filipino-Americans, healthcare workers, families with young children, and individuals who identified themselves as Republicans. Rates were considerably lower among African Americans, Muslims, college students, and pocketed communities in places like San Francisco and Boston, where anti-vaccine sentiment was particularly high.

To reach members of these groups?which, with the exception of the pocketed communities, were largely spread throughout the country?the US government added a new, aggressive advertising campaign to its pro-vaccination efforts. This campaign provided targeted internet advertisements to individuals as they conducted web searches or visited anti-vaccination websites. If someone searched Google for ?Corovax [vaccine] side effects,? for example, a sidebar advertisement appeared on the results page explaining the benefits of the vaccine. Likewise, if someone wished to view the Kalocivir [vaccine] vomiting video on YouTube, they would first have to watch either a montage of pictures illustrating the effects of SPARS or a clip of Paul Farmer?s (read: Fauci) explanation of Corovax?s benefits." P 55

"While the federal government appeared to have appropriately addressed concerns around the acute side effects of Corovax, the long-term, chronic effects of the vaccine were still largely unknown.

Nearing the end of 2027, reports of new neurological symptoms began to emerge. After showing no adverse side effects for nearly a year, several vaccine recipients slowly began to experience symptoms such as blurry vision, headaches, and numbness in their extremities. Due to the small number of these cases, the significance of their association with Corovax was never determined. As of this writing in
2030, longitudinal studies initiated by the NIH at the beginning of the vaccination program have not reached the next round of data collection, so formal analysis on these symptoms has not yet been conducted. Furthermore, these cases arose from the initial cohort of vaccine recipients?those in high-risk populations, including those with other underlying health conditions?making it increasingly difficult to determine the extent to which these symptoms are associated with vaccination." P 59

If you read the whole study, some rather coincidental parallels emerge.

Finally:

"The very real possibility of a future SPARS pandemic necessitates continued commitment to vaccination programs as well as accurate, culturally appropriate, and timely communication from public health agencies across the planet. While the communication experiences of the SPARS pandemic of 2025-2028 offer some examples for how this communication can and should occur, they also identify practices that should be avoided, or at least modified, for responses to future public health emergencies." P67.

Ultimately, CNN calls this scenario a "prediction!"

CNN HEADLINE:
Experts predicted a coronavirus pandemic years ago. Now it's playing out before our eyes.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top