Sunscreens, great example. Let's expand upon that, shall we? Since you brought it up...
https://www.health.harvard.edu/stay...cts-found-to-contain-cancer-causing-substance
Sunscreens have been found to need reapplication, just like boosters of the vaccine. And some ingredients in sunscreens have caused cancers. For some others, sun's reens have caused allergic reactions.
And these small ingredients on their own initial singular use are probably somewhat ok, but over time and reapication, the body is not able to process the ingredients efficiently, causing a potential buildup that can lead to comications for some people.
Yet the sunscreens in the link were previously ruled ok by the government. It was only after long term use that problems were detected.
Now, if one chooses not to use sunscreen, they do have potential to experience complications from sun exposure. They should be smart about how long they are exposed, maybe need to wear additional clothing, or maybe use an organic alternative with more natural, less artificial ingredients. Or maybe use a different sunscreen that does not have the ingredient which is problematic for that individual.
Sure, the government can recommend a d encourage the use of sunscreen. And most people will likely prefer using it as opposed to examining each item, or rely on various 3rd party resources to suggest which ones have caused less or more problems, whether small or large. (EWG is an example of a pretty good site for analyzing such things, but as always, it might not be sufficient for every individual).
And no one has done research thorough enough as to which sunscreens are ok to use with another sunscreen. The ingredients from each that remain in the body, potentially combining together to create a new compound that could be problematic. And that compound might not be realized as a problem until it eventually degrades at some future point, with that degradation process creating something highly toxic.
There are risks with everything, the vaccine is no different. That is why each individual should be allowed to decide if they are willing to accept the risk. That is freedom of choice. Maybe someone prefers minimizing sun exposure and letting their natural response work as it always has. Maybe if they get too exposed they will apply other natural options, such as aloe or cocoa butter, as opposed to seeking a doctor and their artificially created remedies.
The Right to Choose. That is what America is supposed to provide. Not mandates. Educate, inform, hell they can even put out all the advertisements and fear mongering they desire.
Perhaps a better equivalence might be cigarette smoking, since governments have banned that in certain public areas due to the negative effects it can have on others. However, this is not 100% equivalent because non-smokers are not able to produce 2nd hand smoke to someone the way a vaccinated person can still carry and spread Covid.
That is the piece that is the biggest issue still, and why I keep referring back to the hope that the Army/WR vax will be different. No additional shots (buildup of a small toxin that becomes more problematic over time with more injections), and hopefully prevents vaccinated from spreading it. IMO, that Army/WR vax could be a legit option, and I hope it will be. It still might not be for everyone though, just like a singular sunscreen is the right product for every individual.
