byco42
Senior Member
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2011
- Messages
- 15,989
Words matter. You can say technically the same thing two different ways and people get wildly different things out of it. It's not hypothetical, you go outside and some take recommendations seriously, some don't, and some are opposed to people taking precautions.
My strategy is to distance and to stay clean. So far, it's working.
When a person uses the language people point to to justify not wearing masks even though it's one of the best tools we have to save lives without shutting everything down, and there's a real-world consequence of large numbers of people not taking it seriously, how should I describe that?
This is the brand of propaganda that makes me cringe, and it contradicts what this WHO official said on June 8:
Maria Van Kerkhove, the World Health Organization?s (WHO) technical lead for COVID-19, said at a press briefing on June 8 that asymptomatic transmission appears to be ?very rare.? Her statement came just days after the organization directed healthy people living in areas with widespread community transmission to wear fabric face masks in public to help contain the advance of the disease.
"Wait!" says Fauci ( a guy I trust in no way whatsoever) "The WHO is wrong! There is a difference between "asymptomatic" and "pre-symptomatic" in the most convoluted example of triple-master speak I've read in a while. Genius in its convolution. It's difficult to be this vague and it takes extraordinary skill and deftness.
When all the experts keep changing their story, why are they called "experts?"