Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Coronainsanity

Who is the arschloch? The BBC reporter or the strategist from Deutsche Bank?

My reaction is, it?s great Britain anyway, so screw them. If the parliament wants to impose a tax on the already overtaxed people of the United Kingdom, they?ll probably accept it.

Here in the United States, people work from home already do pay taxes that help out people that don?t work from home ? it?s called income tax.

The Deutsche Bank anal-yst, hence the German. And he specifically cited the U.S.

"This could earn $48bn (?36bn) if introduced in the US and would help redress the balance, the bank says."​

I say: Biyute mah crank.

Sidenote, I want to tell Gulo that I heard Dr. Kelly Victory - she?s a real doctor, a person can do a search engine search for her Dash say that the ?excess deaths count? is based on an average of annual deaths from 2015 through last year ? it?s not year to year. So we already know that does go up an average about 35,000 a year every year, So there seems to be a flaw in the excess death count baseline.

Dr. Victory, along with Dr. Ray Casciari, Dr. Nan Heywood, Dr. Dahlia Wachs and everyone knows Dr. Drew Pinsky is ? all medical doctors ? Who can be found on a search engine search ?are physicians who view the response to the pandemic substantially differently than the people who our running our public policy, and I have listened to them primarily to form my Viewpoint-on our response.

I'll review, thanks.
 
The Deutsche Bank anal-yst, hence the German. And he specifically cited the U.S.

"This could earn $48bn (?36bn) if introduced in the US and would help redress the balance, the bank says."​

I say: Biyute mah crank.



I'll review, thanks.

The bank is German, but I think the analyst is a Brit.

You are very welcome for the sources I provided..
 
Who is the arschloch? The BBC reporter or the strategist from Deutsche Bank?

My reaction is, it’s great Britain anyway, so screw them. If the parliament wants to impose a tax on the already overtaxed people of the United Kingdom, they’ll probably accept it.

Here in the United States, people work from home already do pay taxes that help out people that don’t work from home – it’s called income tax.

Sidenote, I want to tell Gulo that I heard Dr. Kelly Victory - she’s a real doctor, a person can do a search engine search for her - say that the “excess deaths count” is based on an average of annual deaths from 2015 through last year – it’s not year to year. So we already know the count goes up an average about 35,000 a year every year, so there seems to be a flaw in the excess death count baseline.

Dr. Victory, along with Dr. Ray Casciari, Dr. Nan Heywood, Dr. Dahlia Wachs and everyone knows Dr. Drew Pinsky is – all medical doctors – Who can be found on a search engine search –are physicians who view the response to the pandemic substantially differently than the people who our running our public policy, and I have listened to them primarily to form my Viewpoint-on our response.

but this would be on top of the income tax they already pay. Really, it makes total sense (if you're MC level stupid) - work from homers are receiving an unexpected benefit by no longer having to commute, and that unexpected benefit shouldn't belong to them, it should be forfeited to the government to arbitrarily redistribute to someone else, giving that person an unexpected benefit. But that person is more worthy of the unexpected benefit accrued to someone else because a government bureaucrat says so.

As for your sidenote, it's a total strawman. We all know, no credible scientist or doctor disagrees with whatever the doctors and scientist who dislike Trump think.
 
Last edited:
Why? Do you think I'm one of the zillionaires who obviously funded that study to in order undermine the efforts to tax their ill-gotten wealth during the pandemic?

That article is total garbage. They state that the total wealth of billionaires rose 31% since March 18, 2020. Well, no shit! March 18th was at the bottom of the market's dive. Since that time, the DOW has risen from 18,500 to about 29,000.

My guess, is billionaire worth went down about the same amount from February 12th 2020 (closer to the actual start of the pandemic) to March 18th when the Dow fell from about 29,000 to the low point of 18,500.

Funny how that article cherry picked the start date of the Pandemic. :cheers:
 
That article is total garbage. They state that the total wealth of billionaires rose 31% since March 18, 2020. Well, no shit! March 18th was at the bottom of the market's dive. Since that time, the DOW has risen from 18,500 to about 29,000.

My guess, is billionaire worth went down about the same amount from February 12th 2020 (closer to the actual start of the pandemic) to March 18th when the Dow fell from about 29,000 to the low point of 18,500.

Funny how that article cherry picked the start date of the Pandemic. :cheers:

It's a good point, disappointed that I missed that. Growth stocks like AMZN, MSFT, AAPL, etc didn't get hit as hard and have outperformed on the recovery as well, but the cherry picked date is definitely deceiving. Not sure why they chose March 18 when the market bottomed on the 23rd, but if you compare current prices to prepandemic peak on Feb 19, Microsoft is up 15%, not 107%; GOOG is up 15%, not 60%; Amazon is up 44%, not 70%.

Plus, stock price appreciation is perfectly legal, and pretty fair. Nothing ill-gotten about those gains.
 
So what's the British word for asshole? Wanker? Sod?

Arsehole? Or is that more Scottish/Irish? I do like how Brits swear at each other in such a congenial manner and certain words that we consider the height of vulgarity (i.e. cunt) are considered much less harsh on the other side of the pond.
 
Arsehole? Or is that more Scottish/Irish? I do like how Brits swear at each other in such a congenial manner and certain words that we consider the height of vulgarity (i.e. cunt) are considered much less harsh on the other side of the pond.

Both of the words suggested are fine and yours is too, and yes, See you next Tuesday word also basically means asshole amongst the British.

?Slag? is the equivalent to the c word for a woman over there.
 
Both of the words suggested are fine and yours is too, and yes, See you next Tuesday word also basically means asshole amongst the British.

?Slag? is the equivalent to the c word for a woman over there.

It can also be used somewhat complimentary almost like ?buddy.? I think I?ve used this reference before, but while living in Australia, I was talking to a good friend and another guy?s name came up who I didn?t know very well. To describe him, my friend said, ?yah mate, he?s a good cunt, mate.?
 
Lori has one of those megaphones with a HEPA filter. Only high-ranking government officials get them.

Ironically, it?s the same policy in China, Russia, Cuba and Argentina.

Equally ironical, just as we were getting ready to really question the veracity of our Great Leaders, ?ladies and gentlemen...we give you...TWINDEMIC!!!

Personally I would have gone with ?Cofluenza,? maybe if only because it sounds more like the name of a fictitious Japanese monster.

This is not unlike the ?texergency?-?textastrophy? debate of the last decade. I prefer textastrophy because the chick mentions ?viral? when she suggests it, and because, ya know, she?s a chick.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mHU1EYeug4M
 
Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot imposes renewed lockdown

Fortunately, she had the good sense to wait to lockdown just after this:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gBdMN6G8R9E


Mayor Beetlejuice!


intro-1536691439.jpg
 
So I just done me a little research.

Annually, just under 3 million people a year die in the United States.

Of those 3 million, over 1 million are attributed to complications from either obesity, diabetes, high blood pressure and old age.

96% of the alleged 200,000+ deaths attributed to Covid have been with the departed sharing one of those comorbidities.

So why is not a single one of those 200,000 not being categorized as having succumbed to one of those comorbidities?

The Covid death count is a patent fraud.
 
Last edited:
So I just done me a little research.

Annually, just under 3 million people a year die in the United States.

Of those 3 million, over 1 million are attributed to complications from obesity, diabetes, high blood pressure and old age.

96% of the alleged 200,000+ deaths attributed to Covid have been with the departed sharing one of those comorbidities.

So why is not a single one of those 200,000 not being categorized as having succumbed to one of those comorbidities?

The Covid death count is a patent fraud.

EDIT: Okay, okay, the above is obviously an opinion.

But there has got to be a comparative analysis of deaths this year that were attributed to comorbidities versus those that were attributed to previous years to those comorbidities before there was Covid to make a determination of the validity of the Covid deaths count, which as everyone knows, I find highly suspect.
 
Back
Top