Am I missing something? At first they said he pulled Brown aside and shot him only because he was walking in the street. That looks pretty bad. The police look incompetent and violent.
Another day goes by and they claim the cop knew about the robbery, saw Brown with a cigar and moved to arrest him because of that. If the facts were on their side, they wouldn't still be playing fast and loose with them, and they would've simply released the police report immediately.
it's not hard. The police shoot and kill people everyday, and we don't see riots. I'm not ignoring anything, and in fact I think you are. The story from the cops is highly suspect, and coupled with the fact that they started showing up in fatigues & riot gear & teargassing before there was even a riot...
I'm guessing you wouldn't get the humor in
this post either, and figure it's just good advice.
this is the same crap excuse we were hearing over the Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin shooting. You don't get it: it's not the fact that the police killed a black kid that's the problem. It's that it appears there was no justification for the shooting, and the police are simply protecting their own. There is no justice and no accountability from the police.
Zimmerman shot and killed an unarmed black kid, and walked... the police didn't even bother conducting a formal investigation and presenting the facts to the DA to weigh charges.
I'm really disappointed in you. Actually, I'm disappointed in a lot of atheists that I see posting about this. You're all making the same mistake that Christians make when defending their bible. You ignore facts and think with your heart and not your head.
First of all, the officer's story was related to a radio station by a friend of his. It was then put to a source with the police and he/she confirmed that it is the story that Darren Wilson gave to police.
I'm not sure what the police chief was thinking when he talked about whether or not Wilson knew about the robbery. He didn't do a good job making himself clear and clouded the whole public image of things. IMO, he's a horrible public speaker and should allow someone else to communicate in his place. Wilson did not know about the robbery when he first confronted Michael Brown, according to the friend's statement.
He pulled along side them, told them to get out of the street. When he started to drive off, the radio mentioned the robbery of the cigars at that convenience store. He had seen Brown carrying the cigars, so he pulled into reverse and that's when the confrontation started.
He tried to get out of the car, but Brown slammed the door on him. He tried again, but Brown punched him and pushed him back into the car. Wilson then went for his gun and then he and Brown wrestled with it. The gun went off (not clear if the shot hit him or not) and that's when Brown and his friend took off running.
Wilson got out with his gun drawn and yelled Freeze. The two of them stopped, turned around and Michael brown started taunting him, saying that he wasn't going to shoot him. That's when Brown bum rushed him. Wilson shot him 6 times. The first 4 were in the arm. That seems to me that he was trying to immobilize him. When that didn't stop him, he shot two more times. They both struck him in the head and fell just a couple feet in front of him.
Now, assuming that story is correct, Would you say it was justified? I would. Brown had already gone for his gun once and was 6'4 and 300lbs.
The witnesses (who are Brown's friends) say that Wilson told them to get the fuck out of the street and then got out of his car with his weapon drawn already. Then Brown put his hands up to surrender and Wilson shot him 6 times.
Seriously? Why would the cop shoot him 4 times in the arm before killing him "execution style"? What seems more logical to you?
Now, one thing I want to point out that protesters are so angry about when people on my side point out. Brown had just robbed the store. He was going to be defensive. I keep hearing "Oh, Brown didn't have a criminal record". Well, shit! He's 18 years old. What about his juvenile record? Dont' give me that sorry story that he was going to college and was such a good kid.
Did you see the video of the robbery? Did it look to you like he was doing that for the first time? He looked like a seasoned pro. There was no hesitation, no nerves, no sympathy for anyone. Protesters keep crying about the media and police painting him like a bad guy...well, that's what he was.
It doesn't justify him being killed, but if Wilson's story is true, I absolutely do not blame him for killing the guy.
You people keep talking about justice. There are two separate investigations going on at the moment. They need to figure out if there is enough evidence to take it to trial. There can only be justice if there is guilt. None of that has been determined.
Most of the time, I side with the victims. The man in NY that was killed after being put in a chokehold, Trayvon Martin, and a friend of mine that was beat up by a cop. In this ONE case, I see a lot of holes in eye witnesses story and believe that the officer involved has the more probable story. Let the investigations conclude and see what happens.