Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Ferguson, MO

Cause a lunatic was shooting people in public?

but after he shot the skateboard guy he quit shooting people. He could have easily kept shooting people if he wanted to. Maybe he quit shooting people because he was done defending himself?
 
Again, the lunatic could have kept on killing as much as he he wanted after he killed skateboard guy.

But again, I see logic and reason mean nothing to you.

Reason and logic would point to the fact he didnt kill anyone after he killed the skateboard guy.
 
but after he shot the skateboard guy he quit shooting people. He could have easily kept shooting people if he wanted to. Maybe he quit shooting people because he was done defending himself?

Or since were talking about a dumbass 17 year old...maybe he shot someone. Realized people didnt like that and started attacking him for it. Then realized he should stop shooting people? Would that be out of the realm of possibility?
 
Or since were talking about a dumbass 17 year old...maybe he shot someone. Realized people didnt like that and started attacking him for it. Then realized he should stop shooting people? Would that be out of the realm of possibility?

At this point the age is irrelevant.



Since the first guy shot, Rosenbaum was the aggressor, the answer to your question is a firm no.
 
Last edited:
Breonna Taylor evidence photos contradict LMPD's 'no body cam' claim

LOUISVILLE, Ky. (LEX 18) — After nearly six months of investigations, the defense legal team released more than 1,200 graphic evidence photos from inside and outside Breonna Taylor's Louisville apartment.

Taylor was shot five times March 13, 2020, while Louisville Metro Police Department officers carried out a no-knock warrant for a drug investigation.

Many of the photos were too graphic to show but those released paint a picture of what happened during the raid:

Nearly a dozen shell casings are seen scattered across the apartment parking lot; dozens more in the alcove in front of Taylor's apartment which is where LMPD Officer Brett Hankinson's termination letter states he fired 10 rounds through a covered patio door and window.
Inside Taylor's apartment, several photos displayed her belongings pierced with bullet holes: her clock, shower, chairs, mirrors, cabinets, pots, inside drawers, shoes as well as walls and ceilings that back up to her neighbors.
In Taylor's room, a photo showed a gun under her bed that was legally owned by her boyfriend Kenneth Walker who was with her that night. Walker said he fired one shot when he thought someone was breaking in.
A photo of LMPD Officer Anthony James revealed he was wearing a body camera. LMPD previously said no body camera video existed as they said officers were not wearing cameras.
Another photo displayed a letter to Taylor from her ex-boyfriend, Jamarcus Glover. He was the person named on the warrant that LMPD used to enter Taylor's apartment. But, he was arrested just minutes earlier during a raid at another location as part of the same drug investigation.
 
Last edited:
I assume the cops involved. I don't think Taylor or her boyfriend were charged with a crime, though it wouldn't surprise me if they were.

Wikipedia article summary: The cops raided the house on the premise that Taylor had dated one of the actual targets of the investigation (who has since been charged) two years before. Neither Taylor or her boyfriend at the time were involved, and there was apparently no actual corroborated evidence implicating either of them.

The police claimed the suspects were sending packages there, but " Postal Inspector Tony Gooden has said that his office had told police there were no packages of interest being received there."

Of course if youre tomdalton, Polish Hammer, or spartanmack, all these people are "irrational thugs" (but that's NOT racist!) and so the police executing a no-knock search warrant on their house in the middle of the night after acting on a baseless suspicion is not a big deal. Breonna Taylor PROBABLY committed some other crime anyway, or would have.

The police are good, and this is a good, not-racist country that respects the Constitutional rights of all its citizens and doesn't recklessly murder them like Iran, or North Korea, China or Russia.

Also, FWIW:
LOUISVILLE, Ky. (AP) ? A lawyer for Breonna Taylor?s family said prosecutors offered a plea deal to an accused drug trafficker that would have forced him to implicate Taylor in criminal activity after her killing by police had pushed her name to the forefront of a national reckoning on race.​

They know they fucked up and killed an innocent person, but are clumsily trying to cover their asses, and I would wager they'll all get away with it, go on to do this again, and again.
 
I assume the cops involved. I don't think Taylor or her boyfriend were charged with a crime, though it wouldn't surprise me if they were.

Yeah, I think the journalist might not have her facts right. It doesn’t sound like what an investigation on behalf of the defense would release; also, why would the police even have a defense team yet when they haven’t been charged?

According to this, the boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, was charged with attempted murder. The charges were dropped two months later.

I think people who are dead anyway don’t get charged with crimes.

Because they’re dead.
 
Last edited:
Aside from the macabre & bad optics of it (remember the cadaver synod?), there would be constitutional issues with charging a dead person with a crime... they're not available to plea, provide testimony on their behalf, and call and confront witnesses. (Maybe If James Woods had his way, that would change.)

Similarly that's why we can't convict someone in absentia in America, with some exceptions, but in no case if they weren't at least present at the start of the trial, and its only a misdemeanor.
 
Heh, you asked the question my dude. I assumed I missed another joke but I answered anyways.

No, my point was the journalist, Claire Kopsky, who wrote the article linked to, didn?t seem to know what she was talking about.

But then again, she?s a chick.
 
Last edited:
Don Trump Jr disagrees with you....he simply chalks it up as a 17yr olds all do stupid things lmao. Stupid doesnt fall far from the tree?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...s-about-kenosha-protest-shootings/ar-BB18SsyM

God, that article is funny on so many levels.

Do people think the ex-wife of the California governor, the screamer, thinks Trump Junior looks Studley with that beard?

Does everybody think she screams when he fucks her?

Who does everybody think she screams or screamed more for - Trump Junior or the governor of California?
 
Don Trump Jr disagrees with you....he simply chalks it up as a 17yr olds all do stupid things lmao. Stupid doesnt fall far from the tree?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...s-about-kenosha-protest-shootings/ar-BB18SsyM

?We're waiting for due process. We're not jumping to a conclusion," Trump Jr. said. "If I put myself in Kyle Rittenhouse('s shoes), maybe I shouldn't have been there. He's a young kid. I don't want 17-year-olds running around the street with AR-15s," he said. "Maybe I wouldn't have put myself in that situation. Who knows? But we all do stupid things at 17," he said.

It sounds like he wasn't talking about the shooting but being there in the first place.
 
Back
Top