I am fucking sick of Trump

[Spartanmack]

Please list the crimes that she's guilty of. Keep on mind she's never been charged with a crime, much less found guilty so that qualifies as completely factually inaccurate (from the guy who loves to talk about facts).

I already posted a list of crimes from the email scandal alone along with proven lies she told about those crimes. I posted it twice and asked you to refute them, but you chose to ignore it both times and now you're asking me to please list her crimes? That's rich. Anyway, according to you, since she hasn't been charged, then she didn't do it because nobody ever committed a crime in America and din't get charged for it, especially one of the most powerful and influential people because those people never got off for any misdeeds.

I've asked you to refute any of the facts with something other than "she hasn't been charged" but you've continuously ignored that. You haven't refuted a single one of them. Months ago you first defended her because she said nothing classified was on her server, then you defended her because there wasn't anything that was classified at the time (even though that doesn't matter and it's still a crime), since that's been disproved by the revelation that several emails marked classified at the time were sent and received on her server, you now call it a phony scandal because she hasn't been charged. You're a Clinton sycophant - you say she's not ideal but you vehemently defend every excuse she's made and you haven't questioned a single one of those excuses as they've been disproved, you merely buy the next one hook, line and sinker. You're a sucker for Clinton, just own it.

 

[biggunsbob]

No one on this board is a sucker for Clinton but we can sure look at the other candidate and tell how grossly unqualified he is for the Oval office. You say you do not like him but you must perfer him over her the way you act on this board.. You may as well just own it yourself. So congrulations Mr. Orange is getting closer to winning this election. You must be Giddy.

 

[tigermud]

No one on this board is a sucker for Clinton but we can sure look at the other candidate and tell how grossly unqualified he is for the Oval office. You say you do not like him but you must perfer him over her the way you act on this board.. You may as well just own it yourself. So congrulations Mr. Orange is getting closer to winning this election. You must be Giddy.

Maybe, maybe not, rumor...

The Democratic National Committee is set to hold an emergency meeting during which it will consider replacing Hillary Clinton as a presidential candidate after her collapse in New York yesterday.

According to Emmy award winning broadcaster David Shuster, Democratic Party operatives will stage a crisis summit during which they will begin the search for an alternative in light of Clinton?s health problems ? and an apparent effort by her campaign to cover them up.

A source told Shuster that the combination of her campaign hiding the fact that Hillary had been suffering from pneumonia for the past three days, in addition to the shocking footage of her fall in New York represented ?unchartered political territory.?

http://www.infowars.com/dnc-to-hold-emergency-meeting-to-consider-replacing-hillary-clinton/

 

[Sbee]

I already posted a list of crimes from the email scandal alone along with proven lies she told about those crimes. I posted it twice and asked you to refute them, but you chose to ignore it both times and now you're asking me to please list her crimes? That's rich. Anyway, according to you, since she hasn't been charged, then she didn't do it because nobody ever committed a crime in America and din't get charged for it, especially one of the most powerful and influential people because those people never got off for any misdeeds.

I've asked you to refute any of the facts with something other than "she hasn't been charged" but you've continuously ignored that. You haven't refuted a single one of them. Months ago you first defended her because she said nothing classified was on her server, then you defended her because there wasn't anything that was classified at the time (even though that doesn't matter and it's still a crime), since that's been disproved by the revelation that several emails marked classified at the time were sent and received on her server, you now call it a phony scandal because she hasn't been charged. You're a Clinton sycophant - you say she's not ideal but you vehemently defend every excuse she's made and you haven't questioned a single one of those excuses as they've been disproved, you merely buy the next one hook, line and sinker. You're a sucker for Clinton, just own it.

show me that list of crimes, I don't see it and I don't remember it. Since you said you did it, you must have, right? All i've seen is your rhetoric about the FBI being controlled by the president, you saying you won't vote for trump but you defend him whenever possible, and saying she's a criminal but not listing the crimes she's committed.

I've said many times that she's not my favorite but my reasons for that aren't the same as yours, I think some of your reasons for disliking her are valid while some are overblown, but somehow that makes me a clinton sycophant, how the hell does that make sense? seriously?

 

[biggunsbob]

Maybe, maybe not, rumor...

The Democratic National Committee is set to hold an emergency meeting during which it will consider replacing Hillary Clinton as a presidential candidate after her collapse in New York yesterday.

According to Emmy award winning broadcaster David Shuster, Democratic Party operatives will stage a crisis summit during which they will begin the search for an alternative in light of Clinton?s health problems ? and an apparent effort by her campaign to cover them up.

A source told Shuster that the combination of her campaign hiding the fact that Hillary had been suffering from pneumonia for the past three days, in addition to the shocking footage of her fall in New York represented ?unchartered political territory.?

http://www.infowars.com/dnc-to-hold-emergency-meeting-to-consider-replacing-hillary-clinton/

Again TM you obviously think he is more qualified. You sit here and bash Clinton nonstop but Mr. Orange has so many things in his past that should disqualify him to be president of the United States and it's is pretty funny how the media, and some on this board just downplay them.

 

[tomdalton22]

Let's replace both of them. Replace Trump with john kasich

 

[Thumb]

Maybe, maybe not, rumor...

The Democratic National Committee is set to hold an emergency meeting during which it will consider replacing Hillary Clinton as a presidential candidate after her collapse in New York yesterday.

According to Emmy award winning broadcaster David Shuster, Democratic Party operatives will stage a crisis summit during which they will begin the search for an alternative in light of Clinton?s health problems ? and an apparent effort by her campaign to cover them up.

A source told Shuster that the combination of her campaign hiding the fact that Hillary had been suffering from pneumonia for the past three days, in addition to the shocking footage of her fall in New York represented ?unchartered political territory.?

http://www.infowars.com/dnc-to-hold-emergency-meeting-to-consider-replacing-hillary-clinton/

Jesus some people will believe anything they read. Even on Alex Jones's websites.

 

[tigermud]

Again TM you obviously think he is more qualified. You sit here and bash Clinton nonstop but Mr. Orange has so many things in his past that should disqualify him to be president of the United States and it's is pretty funny how the media, and some on this board just downplay them.

We are on the other sides of the coin on this one, that's perfectly OK. That's what makes america great. non stop eh? what about 2-3 posts to the politics boards every couple days or so? that's non stop?

At this time yes i'm supporting trump unless a better choice replaces Hillary? Why? well because the crap free trade issues are a huge issue for me, they have been for years! Bring some of those jobs back! stop pitting american workers up against slave wages and calling it good for santa! I want my kids to have a future. Will he do it, will he be able to? idk but I know Hillary won't!! She is a compulsive liar and corrupt to the core bob!, sells out to whomever contributes the most to the foundation doesn't put america first, IMO. Is trump perfect, hell no, far from it! but he doesn't seem to want to continue the selling out of america so i'm good with that. I'm also not aware of any message board guidelines that state a person isn't allowed to highlight the negatives of one candidate over another if he or she might actually be supporting the other candidate, It feels like you are having a hard time with that for some reason. If you'd like to counter my negativity towards Hillary by bashing trump non stop I won't have a problem with that and will still consider you a friend and fellow disgruntled tiger fan. lol

 

[tigermud]

Jesus some people will believe anything they read. Even on Alex Jones's websites.

not anything and or everything, nobody is always right and besides the source of their rumor wasn't themselves thumb it was David Shuster which start via some twitter posts he was making apparently.

 

[biggunsbob]

We are on the other sides of the coin on this one, that's perfectly OK. That's what makes america great. non stop eh? what about 2-3 posts to the politics boards every couple days or so? that's non stop?

At this time yes i'm supporting trump unless a better choice replaces Hillary? Why? well because the crap free trade issues are a huge issue for me, they have been for years! Bring some of those jobs back! stop pitting american workers up against slave wages and calling it good for santa! I want my kids to have a future. Will he do it, will he be able to? idk but I know Hillary won't!! She is a compulsive liar and corrupt to the core bob!, sells out to whomever contributes the most to the foundation doesn't put america first, IMO. Is trump perfect, hell no, far from it! but he doesn't seem to want to continue the selling out of america so i'm good with that. I'm also not aware of any message board guidelines that state a person isn't allowed to highlight the negatives of one candidate over another if he or she might actually be supporting the other candidate, It feels like you are having a hard time with that for some reason. If you'd like to counter my negativity towards Hillary by bashing trump non stop I won't have a problem with that and will still consider you a friend and fellow disgruntled tiger fan. lol

Calling Clinton a compulsive lair and not Trump is pretty funny. He has done nothing but lie this whole campaign. Lol .. those manufacturing jobs are not coming back no matter what trade deals he try's to do. He is just as corrupt iand probably more so the clinton. He is the worst of the top 1% . The Hate canidate.
No I would perfer that both candidates would stop mud slinging and really talk about the issues but the GOP has never really been about that with thier shrinking base, and the Democrats are just to chicken to push the Republicans. Letting trump in the Oval Office will be a disaster that is for sure.

 

[tigermud]

Calling Clinton a compulsive lair and not Trump is pretty funny. He has done nothing but lie this whole campaign. Lol .. those manufacturing jobs are not coming back no matter what trade deals he try's to do. He is just as corrupt iand probably more so the clinton. He is the worst of the top 1% . The Hate canidate.
No I would perfer that both candidates would stop mud slinging and really talk about the issues but the GOP has never really been about that with thier shrinking base, and the Democrats are just to chicken to push the Republicans. Letting trump in the Oval Office will be a disaster that is for sure.

Agree to disagree, thanks

 

[Spartanmack]

show me that list of crimes, I don't see it and I don't remember it. Since you said you did it, you must have, right? All i've seen is your rhetoric about the FBI being controlled by the president, you saying you won't vote for trump but you defend him whenever possible, and saying she's a criminal but not listing the crimes she's committed.

I've said many times that she's not my favorite but my reasons for that aren't the same as yours, I think some of your reasons for disliking her are valid while some are overblown, but somehow that makes me a clinton sycophant, how the hell does that make sense? seriously?

its there, twice. go find it. now go show where I have defended trump. the only positive thing ive said in his defense is that I dont think he is racist. that's hardly defending him "whenever possible" unless you think saying he's a terrible candidate but Hillary is worse is "defending trump whenever possible"

it makes sense because you buy every lie she tells and when they're proved to be lies you buy the next lie. you're a sycophant.

 

[Sbee]

its there, twice. go find it. now go show where I have defended trump. the only positive thing ive said in his defense is that I dont think he is racist. that's hardly defending him "whenever possible" unless you think saying he's a terrible candidate but Hillary is worse is "defending trump whenever possible"

it makes sense because you buy every lie she tells and when they're proved to be lies you buy the next lie. you're a sycophant.

You can paste it here because never once did you list specific crimes that she's committed.


So a sycophant says that the candidate leaves a lot to be desired, sells out the middle class to the political donor class, is flippant, and has no personal warmth whatsover? Somehow that qualifies in your mind, defending her in any way, shape, or form makes you a sycophant? I'm openly critical of her.

 

[dubbsco]

Just as a complete aside to all of this, saw Gary Johnson speak at the DEC today. Was about 5 feet away from him. Pretty cool dude.

 

[Michchamp]

Just as a complete aside to all of this, saw Gary Johnson speak at the DEC today. Was about 5 feet away from him. Pretty cool dude.

did you ask him about Alleppo?

 

[byco42]

The choice between Hillary and Trump is the choice between a president who considers herself above the law vs. one who considers himself immune to it.

 

[dubbsco]

The moderator did. See the GJ thread.

 

[Spartanmack]

You can paste it here because never once did you list specific crimes that she's committed.


So a sycophant says that the candidate leaves a lot to be desired, sells out the middle class to the political donor class, is flippant, and has no personal warmth whatsover? Somehow that qualifies in your mind, defending her in any way, shape, or form makes you a sycophant? I'm openly critical of her.

post 167 details her lies - the ones she told under oath constitute perjury - as well as the fact that she received, sent and maintained classified information on her private server which despite you're misinformed opinion, is a crime.

you pretend to be critical of her for minor nonsense like she lacks warmth but you defend all her misdeeds as "nothing burgers" or whatever nonsense term people use despite factual evidence to the contrary.

 

[Michchamp]

when did she commit perjury? that's a pretty open and shut matter.

nothing burgers, dude.

 

[jwlcosu]

post 167 details her lies - the ones she told under oath constitute perjury - as well as the fact that she received, sent and maintained classified information on her private server which despite you're misinformed opinion, is a crime.

you pretend to be critical of her for minor nonsense like she lacks warmth but you defend all her misdeeds as "nothing burgers" or whatever nonsense term people use despite factual evidence to the contrary.

If you're referring to her FBI testimony, she didn't perjure herself because those politicized dimwits didn't require her to testify under oath. Her entire legacy, however, and everything she touches is complete :bs:. As bad as anything is the Platte River guys pleading the fifth in front of Congress, yesterday, to avoid having to testify about acid washing Hillary's damn private server weeks after the order to preserve evidence had been generated.

Anyone who doesn't get that she's filthy, fucking dirty is a fool. Nevertheless, she's next in line to be POTUS because the country has well and truly tipped.