wlvrnstlr4life
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2011
- Messages
- 15,525
Pot's for burnouts and losers. Now, methamphetamine, thats for cool people.
By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!
Get StartedYeah your campaign to be "king of message boards" doesn't seem so worthwhile huh?
And for the record I'm hungover on this fairly fine Saturday.
appropo of this thread topic, i know a good hangover remedy...
here's my current "problem" or "issue" with weed becoming mainstream:
1. not everyone wants to get high.
2. some have jobs where if they test positive for marijuana they can be fined, suspended, and/or terminated
3. children should not be so easily exposed
now with weed becoming something accepted in society, the problem becomes the second hand smoke. I do not EVER want another contact buzz, and the slightest smell of the smoke is not pleasant for me at all. there will be some who end up in a situation where the second hand smoke is so intense they cannot help but to get buzzed from it.
now, by what right does someone smoking the weed have to give someone else a contact buzz? for someone like me who gets bad migraines from it, it is in some ways a physical assault on my body. then there are the children...and if someone were to be smoking it close enough that my son could get buzzed I am pretty sure I would kick their ass for assaulting my kid by getting him high.
you might be thinking that this could never happen or "just walk away and don't be such a jerk, man...if you don't want to smell it just walk away..." but now that the NYC DA is not going to prosecute people for toting, it is quite possible people could be in a subway car and someone could light up during the longer trips and everyone comes out buzzed.
now think about airlines. do you want your pilot to be potentially suffering from a contact high that they got while going through the terminal? of course if they test positive they can be grounded, but I've never seen a pilot drug tested immediately before their flight.
just saying I think there are some consequences to the second hand smoke that have not been fully thought out by the pro-totes. not everyone wants to be high and they should not have a buzz forced upon them, in essence.
dammit, sorry tinsel...I know u want me to stop "wall"posts...my bad.
quick version, some people don't want contact buzz. is there any legal right to protect them from it?
here's my current "problem" or "issue" with weed becoming mainstream:
1. not everyone wants to get high.
2. some have jobs where if they test positive for marijuana they can be fined, suspended, and/or terminated
3. children should not be so easily exposed
now with weed becoming something accepted in society, the problem becomes the second hand smoke. I do not EVER want another contact buzz, and the slightest smell of the smoke is not pleasant for me at all. there will be some who end up in a situation where the second hand smoke is so intense they cannot help but to get buzzed from it.
now, by what right does someone smoking the weed have to give someone else a contact buzz? for someone like me who gets bad migraines from it, it is in some ways a physical assault on my body. then there are the children...and if someone were to be smoking it close enough that my son could get buzzed I am pretty sure I would kick their ass for assaulting my kid by getting him high.
you might be thinking that this could never happen or "just walk away and don't be such a jerk, man...if you don't want to smell it just walk away..." but now that the NYC DA is not going to prosecute people for toting, it is quite possible people could be in a subway car and someone could light up during the longer trips and everyone comes out buzzed.
now think about airlines. do you want your pilot to be potentially suffering from a contact high that they got while going through the terminal? of course if they test positive they can be grounded, but I've never seen a pilot drug tested immediately before their flight.
just saying I think there are some consequences to the second hand smoke that have not been fully thought out by the pro-totes. not everyone wants to be high and they should not have a buzz forced upon them, in essence.
dammit, sorry tinsel...I know u want me to stop "wall"posts...my bad.
quick version, some people don't want contact buzz. is there any legal right to protect them from it?
as i said, it makes me depressed (i already have that - don't need to be more depreseed)
I smoked a decent amount in college, never bought it for myself but would partake with friends. i think i've smoked weed maybe 4-5 times in the last 15 years, not for the last 5 or so.
for someone who's pretty much a non smoker i'm as pro pot as they come.
I hear you but it seems like paranoia to me. I may have had 1 or 2 contact highs my whole life and I am sure one of those was from a Cuban Cigar.. I get bad headaches when the weather changes so I feel bad for you when you get migraines.. Those can be just flat out terrible ...
It just really bothers me that we have allowed second hand cigarette smoke to kill millions and drunk's to maim and kill in so many ways and you want to kick someone's ass for a contact high... I guess I just don't see t that way... Maybe they should all be banned but if millions are going to use weed we may as well legalize it so we can tax it and try and regulate it.
The best solution to that is only permit smoking inside your own home, or in other designated areas where there's a low risk of exposing others to the second hand smoke.
I don't smoke at all, but I believe in valuing personal freedoms. The only caveats to that is that the personal freedom doesn't jeopardize the well-being of the individual or other members of society. I don't see enough evidence that pot does this any more than alcohol or cigarettes.
Founded in 2011, Detroit Sports Forum is a community of fanatics dedicated to teams like the Lions, Tigers, Pistons, Red Wings, Wolverines, and more. We live and breathe Detroit sports!