No, no I don't. That's my issue. That seems to be everyone's issue.
We consistently have games this close because of ONE constant........our coaching staff. We are so afraid to lose when we get the lead we go soft. Soft and conservative on offense and defense......and our head coach not only seems to allow it, but he seems to be demanding it.
Think about it.......the ONLY time we are aggressive is the beginning of games or when we are behind. We play with such a great pace when we're behind. I know, I know.......defenses will play soft at that point........but why not try it any other time? Why not throw in an up tempo "wrinkle" to this O? Stafford seems to play so much better when we force tempo.
So does the defense. We don't have to blitz every down.....but we play so much better when we TRY to force tempo on defense. We DESTROYED that vaunted Dallas offensive line in the first half of the playoff game last year. That was the single best half of defensive football I have ever seen from a Detroit Lions team. They were absolutely unaware of where and when the blitz was coming from they couldn't move the ball. Romo was looking at the rush and not the coverage. Guys were coming in unblocked (sound familiar).
I just never understand the passive, bend but don't break line of play calling. When has a Super Bowl caliber team EVER played that way? I can think of one, maybe two. The Peyton Manning Colts....who had Peyton Manning. And the Buccanneers......who played that Tampa 2.....but had Pro Bowlers all over the field to make it work extremely well.
MLive had a pretty good article where he brakes down if it was the play calling or lack of execution. Skimmed through the analysis but he pretty much sums it up as a lack of execution. Missed blocks (which will happen with your right side of the line out).