Not much new here really. I should have expected it. Big Ten teams get screwed on a nearly yearly basis now with this stuff. Just wish the committee would be consistent in their criteria. One year it's overall body of work (so lack of Q1 wins worked against us last year), then the next year they just cherry picks certain things or use different criteria altogether.
Oh well, this team has defied the odds all year. Bring on Duke, dammit, if we can get to that point.
Oh well, this team has defied the odds all year. Bring on Duke, dammit, if we can get to that point.
Last edited: