michiganalex
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2013
- Messages
- 1,987
total passing yards 5050 Total Rushing yards 1950
By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!
Get StartedTate had 98 targets in 2013. Burleson had 110 in 2011. I don't see his drop rate dropping that much from 12 more balls.
I think he is saying the drops will have more to do with Staffords placement/velocity of the ball
Drops are based on catchable balls. If it's too poor of placement it's not catchable and not counted as a drop. Tate will put Staffords comp % to the proper spot. Also him playing 16 compared to Burlesons 9 games. Burleson and Titus never had a drop problem. They have hands.
some QBs put the ball where the catch is easy.....Stafford doesn't seem to do that very often.
Those aren't counted as drops is the point though. If it's catchable it's the WRs fault. Drops are not the QBs fault. Drops are always a good throw.
Do we add back when the WR doesn't get proper separation causing Stafford to have to make a tough throw.
5000 passing yards means 8-8.
I'll take 12 INT or less and nice 63.8 completion%.
You'll have to show me proof that all drops are good throws..
Why do you predict Tate will have the most drops?
You'll have to show me proof they weren't since they base the stat off catchable balls.
Those aren't counted as drops is the point though. If it's catchable it's the WRs fault. Drops are not the QBs fault. Drops are always a good throw.
Do we add back when the WR doesn't get proper separation causing Stafford to have to make a tough throw.
It's all subjective. It comes down to someones opinion if it is a drop, which is why it is a junk stat. Different sites show different drop numbers. Some consider a drop anything that hits the hand.
You brought it up ..
And as far as 2011, this isn't 2011.
I agree that different sites show different numbers. But here is the important part so pay attention. EVERY site has Detroit 2-3% higher in drop % than most teams. Meaning no matter what, Staffords comp % should be adjusted 2% higher.
I agree that different sites show different numbers. But here is the important part so pay attention. EVERY site has Detroit 2-3% higher in drop % than most teams. Meaning no matter what, Staffords comp % should be adjusted 2% higher.
I agree that out drop rate is to high. Where we differ is based on the description ive seen I think Stafford contributes to the high rate. I lay part of the blame on him, I think QB contributes to drops.
There are obvious drops that are only on the WR, however I don't recall seeing 40+. It would be nice to see all the plays where a drop was scored.
Those aren't counted as drops is the point though. If it's catchable it's the WRs fault. Drops are not the QBs fault. Drops are always a good throw.
Do we add back when the WR doesn't get proper separation causing Stafford to have to make a tough throw.
if a wr has to reach behind but still gets his hands on the ball it is a drop. All drops aren't good throws.
Founded in 2011, Detroit Sports Forum is a community of fanatics dedicated to teams like the Lions, Tigers, Pistons, Red Wings, Wolverines, and more. We live and breathe Detroit sports!