And still no one is attacking the admitted over-inflation game. Why is that? That one has evidence from the individuals involved statements...yet...chirp, chirp, chirp. If the under-inflation game deserves something, so does the over-inflation game. Am I the only one who gets that??? The proof is right there for the league to penalize the Pats (read, NOT Brady...but the Pats org) without any further proof required. Instead everything is about the under-inflated game because they are getting far more money out of Brady potentially being guilty. Both events should have the same degree of penalty, since Brady was aware during the game and continued to play with the over-inflated ball and didn't report it to the refs.