Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Ryan Broyles unhappy with role, vents on Twitter

If that's the case, then cut him and be done with it. I just think he should be given a game to show what he can do. You never know what you have unless you actually try.

If he is the 5th best wr you have then he doesnt play unless you need him. If there were better options for the 5th spot then go ahead and cut him.
 
Even Durham had an 8 reception game with Calvin out, Fuller catches 1 to 2 balls, pretty sure that's his limit.
 
Even Durham had an 8 reception game with Calvin out, Fuller catches 1 to 2 balls, pretty sure that's his limit.

Apparently you don't understand..Matt is the guy who decides who gets touches. You seem to think if Broyles was playing besides Fuller he'd be getting more receptions than Fuller. Who cares who gets the 1-2 receptions a game..
 
K, Mitchy, it's obvious that you don't care about this passing game being shit cuz Tate is the only receiver that can get open.
 
Very good route runner and has good hands. Not amazing athleticism or measureables. Add white/Caucasian into that description and ask everyone to come up with a Wide Receiver they prolly say Wes Welker. Ryan has the same qualities but he isn't white and doesn't have Tom Brady or Peyton Manning.

Oooooooo, dude....that's a huge comparison. HOF Wes Welker eh ...idk, man.
 
K, Mitchy, it's obvious that you don't care about this passing game being shit cuz Tate is the only receiver that can get open.

Because Broyles is all that..:lmao:

Oh I know "give him a chance" lol. Caldwell doesn't deem he's worthy but kdp does..:cheers:
 
Because Broyles is all that..:lmao:

Oh I know "give him a chance" lol. Caldwell doesn't deem he's worthy but kdp does..:cheers:

Say what u want man, doesn't change the fact that Fuller is worse than Durham. Sat on the practice squad for a year, and nobody wanted a thing to do with him.
 
Last edited:
Say what u want man, doesn't change the fact that Fuller is worse than Durham. Sat on the practice squad for a year, and nobody wanted a thing to do with him.

Then why isn't he playing? Why Leshoure not play last year? Maybe we have dumb ass coaches but Fuller and Ross ahead of him and now they sign retread Edwards. Gotta be a reason..
 
We saw a full year of Leshoure, 0 carries that went over 20 yards. Edwards was signed to the ps, and will probably be cut next week, then resigned on November 1st, then cut on November 4th. That's who he is. Ross has a place on the offense, nothing against him. I'm just over the Fuller experiment, its the next guy in lines turn.
 
Last edited:
I don't get the obsession, bro. Just need a little clarification on the Stephen Hill express.

big tall fast. we have tate, ross, broyles, tj jones and ebron for the slot. When calvin goes down we have zero on the outside. tell me how Patrick Edwards is better than Stephen hill? signing is a waste. hill we could actually use....especially when calvin is out.
 
big tall fast. we have tate, ross, broyles, tj jones and ebron for the slot. When calvin goes down we have zero on the outside. tell me how Patrick Edwards is better than Stephen hill? signing is a waste. hill we could actually use....especially when calvin is out.

Never said Edwards was better than Hill but either or doesn't get the juices flowing. Edwards signs only because of history...that is all. Both players bring NOTHING to the table.
 
Back
Top