- Joined
- Aug 6, 2011
- Messages
- 100,404
Well if we can find better I am all for it..
By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!
Get StartedHe hasn't been fine.
He's has a couple nice games, and he's has some real stinkers. His biggest problem is he does not eat innings. That CG of his was the first time he went over 7 innings in the whole fucking season.
He's what we have and I hope he does well in the playoffs, but he's very mediocre at best.
I just checked, Sanchez averages less than 100 pitches a game. So when he pitches well, his NL coach was taking him out. Up his PC and he'll go more than 7.
He has had 12 starts for the Tigers. He went 7.0 innings twice and over 7 only once. 9 Starts he went less than 7. He went exactly 7.0 innings in 10 of his 19 NL starts.
I don't know what your definition of fine is but imo he's been fine. Who cares about innings, how many NL pitchers consistently go over 7 innings.
Innings is pretty damn important.
As far as Sanchez, he's fine at eating innings.
This will be his 3rd conesuctive season with at least 195 IP.
A starter that you can count on to give you 195 IP with a sub mid to high 3's ERA is very valuable.
So Scherzer hasn't been "fine" either by your standards. He's only went over 7 innings 3 times all fucking season. NEVER over 8.He hasn't been fine.
He's has a couple nice games, and he's has some real stinkers. His biggest problem is he does not eat innings. That CG of his was the first time he went over 7 innings in the whole fucking season.
He's what we have and I hope he does well in the playoffs, but he's very mediocre at best.
So Scherzer hasn't been "fine" either by your standards. He's only went over 7 innings 3 times all fucking season. NEVER over 8.
He had a couple bad starts in April that made is Month of April bad(7.77 era), but since then he's been good to great. May 4.04era, June 3.86, July 3.62, August 2.25 and Sept 2.17. His era was high for the first half because of his first month, after that it steadily was going down. Meaning he was pitching well most of the year. I say solid #2.Yea, I'd still classify Scherzer as an enigma.
He's lights out at times, and bad at others.
He was fantastic down the stretch, but the majority of the year he has an ERA closer to 5 than 4. Don;t forget most people used to groan when it was Max's turn to pitch until he started rolling in late July.
I believe Scherzer is a #4, #3 maybe.
those occasional bad starts are what keeps him from being a #1, doesn't make him a "4 maybe 3".Those are good points. A bad month. But he's been solid since..
I see it as we have a 1+, 2 2's and 2 4's with 3 potential. I'll put our top 3 up against anyone when they're all on.Which is fine because Fister is a good 2.
He had a couple bad starts in April that made is Month of April bad(7.77 era), but since then he's been good to great. May 4.04era, June 3.86, July 3.62, August 2.25 and Sept 2.17. His era was high for the first half because of his first month, after that it steadily was going down. Meaning he was pitching well most of the year. I say solid #2.
And they were against good teams so haters, suck it.
Founded in 2011, Detroit Sports Forum is a community of fanatics dedicated to teams like the Lions, Tigers, Pistons, Red Wings, Wolverines, and more. We live and breathe Detroit sports!