Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Stafford is 0-15 on the road vs winning teams

If you look at the Cowboys they have had some pretty unsexy drafts but have built up a pretty damn good oline. I think we need a lg, and rt and some more depth.
 
You all realize it is impossible to go 0-16, the Raiders just beat the Chiefs to back this. This means the Lions will absolutely beat the Pats, because it is impossible to go 0-16.

Impossible I tell ya!
 
You all realize it is impossible to go 0-16, the Raiders just beat the Chiefs to back this. This means the Lions will absolutely beat the Pats, because it is impossible to go 0-16.

Impossible I tell ya!

The Lions have already proven that it is very possible to go 0-16.
 
ive been saying it for 10 years.....Build the line and it doesn't matter what rb you have back there. Our oline blows at run blocking. Waddle sucks, Samsonite will be moved to center but he isn't very good, sims is done, reiff is fine. So we need a tackle, lg and could use an upgrade at center if we want to be a good running team. Warlord is the only lineman we have that is above average at run blocking.

Ive freaked out on mayhew for years for investing high round picks on rbs without a good oline.....I was later proven right. Last year was a complete anomaly probably cause CJ was such a monster the year before.....we had a 6 man box to run against practically the entire year.

With all that being said.....Melvin Gordon III (mg3) would look dang good in honalulu blue lol. But id probably still complain about the pick due to all the needs on this team. I don't put RB as a very high one.

The only way he's around, barring a trade, when we draft, is if NFL teams have become THAT averse to investing anything into running backs. He is special.
 
The only way he's around, barring a trade, when we draft, is if NFL teams have become THAT averse to investing anything into running backs. He is special.

I think we'll be drafting around 18-22....not crazy to think hes there around then. Rbs shouldn't go top 15 anymore and he might not be the first rb off the board.
 
tannehill with lazor for 6 months has easily surpassed Stafford.

that being said....Stafford with lombardi has regressed to ryan Fitzpatrick type levels.
 
Last edited:
tannehill with lazor for 6 months has easily surpassed Stafford.

that being said....Stafford with lombardi has regressed to ryan Fitzpatrick type levels.

Tannehill has what, 20 TD's now? Matt, 13. That's crazy. Add in 9 INT and 2 FBL and he pretty much has been useless.
 
0-16 now.

Update on Matt's 2014 numbers.

8th in yards with 2943
28th in comp % 58.8%
20th in yards per attempt 7.09
Tied for 17 in TDs with 13
4th most INTS with 10
26th in QB rating @ 81.0
 
0-16 now.

Update on Matt's 2014 numbers.

8th in yards with 2943
28th in comp % 58.8%
20th in yards per attempt 7.09
Tied for 17 in TDs with 13
4th most INTS with 10
26th in QB rating @ 81.0

bla bla bla, but what are his TRUE numbers
 
0-16 now.

Update on Matt's 2014 numbers.

8th in yards with 2943
28th in comp % 58.8%
20th in yards per attempt 7.09
Tied for 17 in TDs with 13
4th most INTS with 10
26th in QB rating @ 81.0

58.8% in this era is pathetic.
 
Back
Top