Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Suh can play against the Cowboys

Finally somebody with some sense. Good job by the arbitrator. You can't possibly watch the video and say for sure it was intentional, which is exactly why this got lowered to a fine. It was all speculation on his reputation.

Sure you can. Even the arbitrator thought it was or there would be no fine.
 
You don't fine a guy if you thought it was an accident.
 
Last edited:
Suh everybody's favorite villain yea NFL can't have a good show without a villain too bad it couldn't have been like the Pistons in the 90's when everybody just embraced it and wore it with a badge of honor. NFL has done such a great job playing up the villain they even have their own fans hating the guy. Lol excellent entertainment jolly good show chaps!
 
It was intentional. He knew what he was doing.

It wasn't horrible, but it was intentional.
 
Sure you can. Even the arbitrator thought it was or there would be no fine.

No that isn't true. They did the exact same thing when he hit Schaub in the nuts. They thought he did it on purpose but the video evidence wasn't good so they fined him. Same thing here.
 
The thing I don't get is that you can dive at a QB's knees (4th QTR 30 sec left Daniels sacks Stafford) and there is no flag, no fine, no suspension even though its against the rules, but Suh steps on a guy and its this big media explosion and initially gets a suspension. League is biased about who they protect and who they punish. If Suh had done that to Rodgers he would have been kicked out of the league.
 
Oh you mean when he did a Dhalsim move and INTENTIONALLY kicked him in the nuts? Have you ever fallen, and then found an extra gear to judo kick behind you? Of course not, because it's not a natural motion.

Dude, stop sticking up for him. I get he's on our home team, but he's a cheap player.
 
Last edited:
Did you guys read about Staff's fianc?e tweeting about the NFL babying Rogers? You can't even access her account anymore. Stupid Packers fans threatening her and calling her names.

Search @kbhall82 on Twitter and look at some of the crap. People are idiots.
 
Did you guys read about Staff's fianc?e tweeting about the NFL babying Rogers? You can't even access her account anymore. Stupid Packers fans threatening her and calling her names.

Search @kbhall82 on Twitter and look at some of the crap. People are idiots.



Someone should ask her if Staff is always missing her target and throwing it behind her, over her head, or at her feet in the bedroom.


giggty
 
Oh you mean when he did a Dhalsim move and INTENTIONALLY kicked him in the nuts? Have you ever fallen, and then found an extra gear to judo kick behind you? Of course not, because it's not a natural motion.

Dude, stop sticking up for him. I get he's on our home team, but he's a cheap player.

Nobody is sticking up for him. But we (as in all of society) doesn't excessively punish people without proof. Same situation here. Proof sucks so he can't be suspended. Don't know why this concept is so hard to grasp.
 
Nobody is sticking up for him. But we (as in all of society) doesn't excessively punish people without proof. Same situation here. Proof sucks so he can't be suspended. Don't know why this concept is so hard to grasp.

Yet they gave him a fine..why if he was innocent?
 
I read the part where it said "couldn't reach judgment on intent." Well someone did here or else he wouldn't have been suspended in the first place..

And the arbitrator probably disagreed, which is why he is no longer suspended.
 
Back
Top