Trump fires Tillerson

[tinselwolverine]

It wouldn't even be a close vote. 1 million plus !!!!! Would vote it down!!!

Yeah nice.

And we're back to "remember how bad it would've been if Hillary had been elected?"

"If ifs and buts was candies and nuts, we'd all have a happy St. Paddy's."

Californians don't get their own direct vote on the wall.

Can we all just stay focused for a minute on shit that is actually really real?

In ballot initiatives, we prefer our social justice legislation to be reflective along these lines:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GkeNEvwq7A0

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=N0Bp5odIZjQ

 

[Gulo Blue]

Yeah nice.

And we're back to "remember how bad it would've been if Hillary had been elected?"

"If ifs and buts was candies and nuts, we'd all have a happy St. Paddy's."

Californians don't get their own direct vote on the wall.

Can we all just stay focused for a minute on shit that is actually really real?

In ballot initiatives, we prefer our social justice legislation to be reflective along these lines:

So...you want us to guess how things would have shaken out if Kennedy wasn't assassinated?

 

[tigermud]

I chose it because it just happened less than 48 hours ago genius. If you want more examples, head on over to the separate thread I created and explain it all away. I'm sure you'd be giddy to tell us how wonderful he is.




I didn't interject any race into the equation. You leapt to that conclusion on your own. I told you what I thought he meant. I don't think there is some deep philosophical meaning behind it. I think he had another 'grab her by the pussy' moment on a live mic and now we're being told by his supporters that he's just 'telling it like it is'.



And I believe that's a convenient, weak, bullshit cop out. To each their own.



And you never will. The dude has already bragged about sexually assaulting women and made fun of physically handicapped people on live television. Short of murdering someone in the street in cold blood, you'll be chanting 'lock her up' and complaining about e-mails until the bitter end.

...i'll get over their eventually one thing at a time. One at a time! LOL

...that's all well and good but still doesn't explain what "Everybody knows he meant" Your explanation about Diplomacy and Wrong to say was not an answer to what everybody knows he supposedly meant. And yeah I've never said anything in a locker room in front of the guys either. BFD

...maybe so but still a factor none the less, I start with the benefit of the doubt until conclusively proven otherwise.

...not true, have stated many times I don't agree with everything he says and does rather the balance of the whole leads me to still favor and support. and I personally have never chanted lock her up, don't find it necessary. the email issue is the least of my complaints. I see just the other day my wife checked in with me first to be told to vote for trump in 2016. I didn't know that. Ya great such a lovely role model for women whom apparently believes can't think for themselves. wuhh,

 

[tigermud]

your sarcasm is pathetic and wtf, you don't like "cussing?!" the new moniker is just for you, bro. Go Buffs!




and Fuck Trump!

Thought about your 71% number a little more, just out of curiosity wondering what the break down on that is by major and GPA vs the 29% not overly important just curious is all.

 

[tigermud]

If you think we should focus on toxins in the food supply, then you should be upset that Trump's pick to head the EPA rejected the EPA's own safety expert's conclusions that the pesticide chlorpyrifos should be banned.

If I avoid all the stuff I think you're wrong about and just focus on your own claims, you should at least be upset about that. Trump put a fox in the hen house with that appointment.

completely agree that we should ban it, try to avoid it as much as possible although increasingly impossible you'll get no argument from me there. Again after weighing all the pro's and con's of Trump still support him overall. Do you have a better candidate we can back that won't take us all back to the UN usenco sell-out plan?


http://www.whatsonmyfood.org/pesticide.jsp?pesticide=160

 

[Gulo Blue]

completely agree that we should ban it, try to avoid it as much as possible although increasingly impossible you'll get no argument from me there. Again after weighing all the pro's and con's of Trump still support him overall. Do you have a better candidate we can back that won't take us all back to the UN usenco sell-out plan?


http://www.whatsonmyfood.org/pesticide.jsp?pesticide=160

The environment is more important than UNESCO (what a weird qualifier to but on your question) and I don't believe any candidate from either the Republican or Democrat primary would have picked someone more antagonistic to the EPA than Scott Pruit.

 

[TheVictors]

And for what it?s worth, I think you?re stupid. Entitled until the end of days to opinion but...


stupid





Carry on.

 

[Gulo Blue]

The US hasn't funded UNESCO since 2011 and hasn't been allowed to vote since 2013. Even when we did fund it, it was only $80 million. So our participation is mostly a non-issue and back when it was an issue, it was more on the scale of pesticide lobbying than pesticide use or effects.

 

[Michchamp]

And for what it?s worth, I think you?re stupid. Entitled until the end of days to opinion but...


stupid





Carry on.

Hey, who was this directed to??

Quote the person you're calling stupid!

 

[tigermud]

The US hasn't funded UNESCO since 2011 and hasn't been allowed to vote since 2013. Even when we did fund it, it was only $80 million. So our participation is mostly a non-issue and back when it was an issue, it was more on the scale of pesticide lobbying than pesticide use or effects.

Look he won as a result of his America first message, and that resonates with me and many others. Americanism, not globalism.

This had it right. Trump is the result of the neglect of the own backyards. Yes that is what went wrong so we are trying something different.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/27/us/politics/globalism-un-assembly-nationalism-populism.html

right or wrong, they left middle America in a ditch and trump is the result and I can assure you the more folks like Hillary bash us and victors flips us the bird and tell us to go fuck ourselves. the longer it will take to find a better path.

 

[Gulo Blue]

Look he won as a result of his America first message, and that resonates with me and many others. Americanism, not globalism.

This had it right. Trump is the result of the neglect of the own backyards. Yes that is what went wrong so we are trying something different.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/27/us/politics/globalism-un-assembly-nationalism-populism.html

right or wrong, they left middle America in a ditch and trump is the result and I can assure you the more folks like Hillary bash us and victors flips us the bird and tell us to go fuck ourselves. the longer it will take to find a better path.

You are a moving target.

There's a pretty significant backlash against globalism right now and Trump's election was fueled in part by that. So what? He's still terrible for the environment. Undeniably terrible. (Which is why you keep trying to bring up other stuff.)

 

[tigermud]

You are a moving target.

There's a pretty significant backlash against globalism right now and Trump's election was fueled in part by that. So what? He's still terrible for the environment. Undeniably terrible. (Which is why you keep trying to bring up other stuff.)

I concede your pesticide point and again if you can locate a better option that won't take us back on that globalist path I'll support him or her.

 

[Gulo Blue]

I concede your pesticide point and again if you can locate a better option that won't take us back on that globalist path I'll support him or her.

With regard to globalism, I suspect that if there were some good measure of globalist activities, which would be difficult, you'd find a shift from governments to private companies as driving forces of globalist activity. Trump is no better on this front than anyone else. He preaches protectionism, but he doesn't practice it.

 

[TheVictors]

Hey, who was this directed to??

Quote the person you're calling stupid!

The stupid person who thinks it?s 1957.

 

[Spartanmack]

Yeah nice.

And we're back to "remember how bad it would've been if Hillary had been elected?"

"If ifs and buts was candies and nuts, we'd all have a happy St. Paddy's."

Californians don't get their own direct vote on the wall.

Can we all just stay focused for a minute on shit that is actually really real?

In ballot initiatives, we prefer our social justice legislation to be reflective along these lines:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GkeNEvwq7A0

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=N0Bp5odIZjQ

"If ifs and buts were Guiness & Jamesons, then we'd all have a happy St. Paddy's".

When it comes to ballot initiatives, I like them to align with a few of my favorite things - and now I'm reminded of a song from The Sound of Music. I'll edit my post later to add video of it - hard to find videos sites that get past the firewall these days.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IagRZBvLtw

 

[Spartanmack]

Hey, who was this directed to??

Quote the person you're calling stupid!

be careful what you wish for...

 

[tinselwolverine]

So...you want us to guess how things would have shaken out if Kennedy wasn't assassinated?

No, not guess them.

Remember them.

The reference to Camelot was about the Utopian fantasy musical itself...not about the Kennedy Administration; the simultaneousness of the events of the debut of the musical and the election and subsequent Presidential Administration were surely coincidental.

While Alan Lerner, the co-writer and producer, had been Kennedy's college room mate at Harvard, at the time the project went into development in 1959, the likelihood that Kennedy would be elected the next president was probably less so than the likelihood that Barack Obama would be elected president the same amount of time before he was, in 2008.

It is well known, for reasons that should seem obvious, President Kennedy and his First Lady were very fond of the numbers from the musical.

Both of the numbers in the videos posted describe life in the idyllic fantasy worlds; of Oz, and of Camelot.

I feel sometimes Californians view themselves as living in idyllic, utopian fantasy.

That's what makes it so funny, see?

 

[Gulo Blue]

No, not guess them.

Remember them.

Oh yeah. I botched that one.

 

[Spartanmack]

On second thought, this probably fits your theme better (and it's sort of in keeping w/ my theme since as a young boy, Olivia Newton John was one of my favorite things)...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDxcfTm1QTc