Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Brett Kavanaugh

oh, I get it. I don't think you do.

Substantiate (Verb): Provide evidence to support or prove the truth

The allegations against Cavanaugh have not been substantiated. That is a fact. Will there be evidence that he did it...no. That's the problem with "he said she said" accusations...especially 30 years later.

Not when there are Three of them !
 
That?s the point.

Conservatives were rushing to Bill Clinton?s defense always every time another chick accused him of rape while at the same time liberals were storming the Clinton White House with pitchforks and torches over it.

And I think Trump is a pig and a rapist too.

Seems to me like partisans think that rape only applies when it?s accused against the other side.

Let's see.

When the democrats put forth a candidate for the supreme court and he or she is accused of something then they better sure as shit stop and not try and ram the vote through. Where these the same GOP members that voted to impeach Clinton ? My god things Trump has done would put anything Bill Clinton did to shame tenfold. It is weird how GOP presidents continue to lose the popular vote , and yet keep getting numerous chances to shape the court further to The far right. Flat out Amazing how the GOP political tactics have destroyed fairness.
 
Trump wavers on Supreme Court nominee Kavanaugh

WASHINGTON/NEW YORK (Reuters) - President Donald Trump on Wednesday said he could withdraw his support for Brett Kavanaugh depending on the testimony in a high-profile Thursday hearing into multiple accusations of sexual misconduct against the Supreme Court nominee.

Trump defended Kavanaugh, now a federal appeals court judge, at a New York news conference, but the president’s comments injected another note of uncertainty into Kavanaugh’s already troubled bid for a lifetime appointment to the nation’s highest court.

“You know, believe it or not, I’m going to see what’s said” at the hearing, Trump told reporters.

A third woman has accused Kavanaugh of aggressive sexual behavior in the 1980s. The nominee has vehemently denied all of the allegations ahead of the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing coming up on Thursday where one of his accusers, Christine Blasey Ford, will also testify to senators.

Trump dismissed the allegations against Kavanaugh as a “big fat con job” orchestrated by Democrats. He did not say that Kavanaugh’s female accusers were lying.

“I can always be convinced,” Trump said. “It will be interesting to hear what she has to say.”
 
Not when there are Three of them !

Three people with separate stories, about separate incidences, is not evidence. If you believe each story then it could convince you that each story is true.

Reading these stories, it appears that this guy was a big partier in high school and probably a turd.
 
Trump claims the Democrats orchestrated this?

They can't even tie their own shoelaces correctly.
 
Prove that they are unsubstantiated? She passed a lie dector test. Typical Right slinging at the accuser being done by your side hack so stop calling people slime balls unless you look in the mirror . Immoral . Maybe put up a candidate that doesn’t want to vote hard core Right all the time for a change .Try not stealing a Supreme Court pick. Immoral didn’t a third women just come out on this slimeball piece a shit judge. You and your party are such Hypocrites. Just like always .. Nothing has changed from the piece of shit GOP.

interesting that lie detector tests matter now but not when George Zimmerman passed one. Did you read the report for the lie detector? It was hardly a thorough test. They had her write down her story on paper and then asked her two questions, neither one mentioned Kavanaugh. They simply asked her if any part of her statement was false, then if any part was made up.

And yes, a third woman came forward claiming she saw Kavanaugh in a train line waiting for his turn to rape a girl while she herself was being gang raped or something outrageous like that. She said she attended 10 such parties where girls were routinely drugged and gang raped and didn't stop going to these parties until she herself became a victim. then, she never told the cops about any of it - she literally claims to have witnessed dozens of girls getting gang raped at multiple parties that NO ONE ever said a word about to authorities. Also, she's 3 years older than Kavanaugh, what was she doing at high school gang rape parties while she was in college? Now it's come out that her exboyfriend, who had to get a restraining order against her says she has zero credibility. Oh, and she has a longstanding close friendship with the lawyer of Kavanaugh's first accuser. And oh by the way, her lawyer didn't go to Maryland law enforcement with these accusations, he took them to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

If you believe any of that story is possible, and nothing would come out about it until 30 years later, and she's the only witness who says any of it happened is anything more than lies and grandstanding temper tantrums from leftists who believe it's their right to run the country, sorry but you're an idiot.
 
Last edited:
interesting that lie detector tests matter now but not when George Zimmerman passed one. Did you read the report for the lie detector? It was hardly a thorough test. They had her write down her story on paper and then asked her two questions, neither one mentioned Kavanaugh. They simply asked her if any part of her statement was false, then if any part was made up.

Do you have a link to that report?

I've been wondering about the details of the polygraph.

I haven't seen many - just that it was administered by a former FBI agent, and the results were submitted to the Washington Post.
 
I just came across this apparently, late yesterday, two unidentified dudes have stated to members on the Senate Judiciary Committee, that it was them, not Kavanaugh, who assaulted Blase Ford.

"I am Spartacus!"

So the plot thickens.
 
I just came across this apparently, late yesterday, two unidentified dudes have stated to members on the Senate Judiciary Committee, that it was them, not Kavanaugh, who assaulted Blase Ford.

"I am Spartacus!"

So the plot thickens.

IMO...this is very unbelievable. :cheers:
 
I just don't get why she didn't pull out her camera phone and film her attackers.

Even that one lady that Al Franken groped had the common sense to have a camera set up to take pictures while she napped.
 
I don't understand why the most recent girl kept going back to parties where girls get drugged and gang-raped. I don't know...I think if I saw this once, I wouldn't go back.
 
I don't understand why the most recent girl kept going back to parties where girls get drugged and gang-raped. I don't know...I think if I saw this once, I wouldn't go back.

That story seems the most bizarre of the three, without question.
 
I just don't get why she didn't pull out her camera phone and film her attackers.

Even that one lady that Al Franken groped had the common sense to have a camera set up to take pictures while she napped.

The Al Franken accuser's name is LeeAnn Tweeden. She's actually a celebrity.

Obviously you were joking - there were no camera phones back in the day when Blase Ford claims her story happened.

But she could have the same forward thinking that LeeAnn had, and had the camera set up to take pictures in advance.

LeeAnn Tweeden Wikipedia
 
Last edited:
In my opinion, Kavanaugh's career itself should disqualify him for this post, as his career advancement has clearly been due to political favors; working on the Clinton impeachment and in the Bush White House authorizing torture doesn't make him "Supreme Court material" and the rest of his career moves all stem from the payback he got from his GOP buddies for doing their dirty work.

I know among SOME people, having that opinion makes me "a stupid idiot" and "a turd" but I had the same opinion of Kagan, who was nowhere near as sleazy as Kavanaugh, but still was getting in more due to political favoritism (Larry Summers was a big supporter of hers); she was not Supreme court material based on her record.

What's really crazy though, is - beyond all that - which incidentally almost NO GOP senators, and even most Democrats don't have any qualms about - he could PROBABLY get away with all the sexual abuse issues if he would just admit he was young and made some mistakes.

...instead he's made these defiant and also clearly false statements about what an angel and virgin he was all his life, looking like a sap on talk shows, dragging his wife into it, etc. destroying any credibility he had left and almost single-handedly creating this whole shit show.

An obvious lack of judgment on his part. Not very... judge-like.
 
Obviously you were joking - there were no camera phones back in the day when Blase Ford claims her story happened.

Whew..glad you picked up on that. Someone might have missed it.

I meant that to sound snarky as I typed it but realized it's probably the truth, so without satire, thanks.

The Al Franken accuser's name is LeeAnn Tweeden. She's actually a celebrity.

But she could have the same forward thinking that LeeAnn had, and had the camera set up to take pictures in advance.

LeeAnn Tweeden Wikipedia

At first glance of her name I thought it was Gene Simmons wife but that is actually Shannon Tweed according to Google. I've never heard of Franken's accuser outside of that story. She should probably do Playboy again to stay relevant.
 
Back
Top