mhughes0021 said:
Dh for sure for dy. Atleast until the 3b experiment fails for cabby and he goes back to a 1b/dh platoon with prince.
What is the metric for failure?
The average 3B gets 2.73 total chances per game (PO + A + E).
Longoria had 2.82 last year, Inge had 2.94 and on the low end, Mark Reynolds had 2.08. These total chances are predicated by the type of pitching staffs a team has. For his career, Cabrera has averaged 2.40. This means, basically, there will be 51 balls over the course of a season that Cabrera will not make a play on that an average 3B would. Ultimately, using linear weights, these plays would result in an additional 17 runs being scored over the course of a season more than an average 3B. Now, will Cabrera offensively make up those 17 runs? Yes, and then a ton more.
Now, in LF, the average is 2.15. Young averages 1.84 (Raburn is career 2.34) and that means he gets to 48 less balls then the average LF. I will argue that it is more costly to have a LFer get to 48 less balls, then a 3B getting to 51 less balls. So, linear weights added, the result is about 25 runs more than an average LFer.
So, what is more costly? Cabrera at 3B or Young in LF? Keep in mind, Cabrera will be the best offensive 3B, where Young is about average to slightly below average offensively as a LFer.
The "experiment" of having Young spending any amount of time in LF would be far more of a failure than any amount of time Cabrera spends at 3B. Of course, my assumption is that Cabrera obtains his career averages at 3B. But even if he is a little less, his offense still negates Young's presence in LF.