Odell Beckham Jr. at 10?

[tonyballs]

And you're an idiot so we're even.

I'm not the retard who gets mad because they try and help out our QB. Idiot? Look in the mirror..

 

[dubbsco]

How many weapons does Stafford until we maybe start to see that he's not making these guys better? You don't need freaking incredible WRs 1-3 to win a title. Calvin Johnson and Golden Tate are strong enough to win the whole thing, as long as Stafford doesn't make Calvin catch passes 90 feet over his head.

2014- Seattle Seahawks best WRs- Golden Tate, Doug Baldwin
2013- Baltimore Ravens best WRs- Torrey Smith, Marlon Brown

Do those guys scream elite? They are decent. These teams have elite defenses. This team needs help in the secondary, and if it's a WR in the first round, it'll be a huge misstep by an organization that has no wiggle room. You can find these WRs that will help you win a Super Bowl in rounds 2-4, you don't need to burn it on someone like Watkins or Beckham.

Maybe the team can find a guy in the 2nd round who has a torn ACL or is a headcase.

 

[Mitchrapp]

I'm not the retard who gets mad because they try and help out our QB. Idiot? Look in the mirror..

Who gets mad. It's a forum where discussions take place where you seem to never grasp that concept.

 

[tonyballs]

Who gets mad. It's a forum where discussions take place where you seem to never grasp that concept.

Oh, i grasp it!! You get sore because they're trying to help out our franchise QB. Then you completely make false statements by saying they never address the defense. It's comical..

 

[dubbsco]

Does it make it even worse that they have addressed the defense in past drafts, but the defense is still not where it needs to be? Doesn't that speak even more to the inability of this regime to find the right talent and bring them along?

How about instead of talking about what this team has done in past drafts, lets talk about RIGHT NOW. And RIGHT NOW, they don't need a 3rd WR. How many teams need to have 3 top flight WRs to win a SB? Stafford has enough help. He needs to start helping them. And this team needs secondary help BADLY.

 

[tonyballs]

Does it make it even worse that they have addressed the defense in past drafts, but the defense is still not where it needs to be? Doesn't that speak even more to the inability of this regime to find the right talent and bring them along?

How about instead of talking about what this team has done in past drafts, lets talk about RIGHT NOW. And RIGHT NOW, they don't need a 3rd WR. How many teams need to have 3 top flight WRs to win a SB? Stafford has enough help. He needs to start helping them. And this team needs secondary help BADLY.

Defense needs help. Fine. I'm on board with that, but to say it hasn't been addressed is fn ignorant. Shows peoples true colors on how much they don't know.

But wether you believe it or not, this team needs another WR. We have guys like Durham, Ross and Ogletree fighting for that #3. Say CJ or Tate go down and WR isn't addressed, we're right back to last years shitstorm of garbage.

 

[dubbsco]

I can say that for any position in the NFL Tony. What happens if X goes down? That's a consistent message for any sporting franchise. Your QB needs to help the WRs. It's been a pretty common theme that the teams winning superbowls have elite defenses, and offenses that are effective, but don't have to be explosive. You don't need 3 studs at WR. Calvin and Tate are just fine, and if one of them goes down, that's the nature of the game, and you make adjustments. I don't mind them addressing another WR, but that's not a pick you use in the 1st round. There's plenty of depth at WR in this draft, and a guy like Dennard or Gilbert can be a huge pickup.

 

[tonyballs]

I can say that for any position in the NFL Tony. What happens if X goes down? That's a consistent message for any sporting franchise. Your QB needs to help the WRs. It's been a pretty common theme that the teams winning superbowls have elite defenses, and offenses that are effective, but don't have to be explosive. You don't need 3 studs at WR. Calvin and Tate are just fine, and if one of them goes down, that's the nature of the game, and you make adjustments. I don't mind them addressing another WR, but that's not a pick you use in the 1st round. There's plenty of depth at WR in this draft, and a guy like Dennard or Gilbert can be a huge pickup.

I hear ya, bro. Like i said, i'm on board with a Gilbert or Dennard. I'm in love with Mack, but the price will more than likely be too high.

A little FYI, Lions #2 and #3 WRs were Bush and Bell ...pathetic.

 

[Mitchrapp]

Rams SB team, Faulk number two in receiving yards. Who cares who gets the yards?

 

[tonyballs]

Rams SB team, Faulk number two in receiving yards. Who cares who gets the yards?

What a fn ridiculous statement...lol. Coming from you though...BINGO!!! I guess you're on board with a Durham, Ogletree or Ross as our #2 f CJ or Tate go down??

 

[dubbsco]

I don't mind another WR, but in terms of what this team needs, it's down the list. The Lions have enough right now on offense to be fine. The secondary needs to not be swiss cheese for one game.