Stafford in Focus

[dubbsco]

Yeah, winning the superbowl, over 100 QB rating his first two years, moving that offensive effectively and did everything that was asked for him. Why give him praise for that?

 

[Monster]

LKP needs a name change. I suggest "Defendo The Clown". Jeez. This is getting embarrassing. I wonder what would happen if I talked shit about the ford field public urinals. Defendo the clown to the rescue!

 

[cheeno]

Waddle is winning the job right now from everything I read. Hilliard won't win it.

http://espn.go.com/blog/detroit-lions/post/_/id/8861/lions-mailbag-some-secondary-questions

Split reps

Http://www.freep.com/article/20140627/SPORTS01/306270082/detroit-lions-laadrian-waddle

 

[tomdalton22]

More attempts make it harder to keep the ints low (more pick opportunities) and ypa up. Plus style of offense has a lot to do with YPA. Some teams slowly kill you with first downs. That's more impressive. That is the Lions.

more attempts does make it harder to keep the number of INTs low but the interception ratio is based on the number of INTs divided by the total attempts. Stafford's is about 3% and Wilson's is about 2.4%.

 

[cheeno]

LKP needs a name change. I suggest "Defendo The Clown". Jeez. This is getting embarrassing. I wonder what would happen if I talked shit about the ford field public urinals. Defendo the clown to the rescue!

Piss on your leg and try to convince you it's raining?

 

[brewer229]

Waddle is winning the job right now from everything I read. Hilliard won't win it.

Wilson had the turnovers to carry him. If he had to give long drives like Stafford, Wilson wouldn't have been successful last year especially with just Baldwin and Tate. Wilson is the most overrated QB in the league. Wilson had a more consisten run game too. Tate did well for him and has very good hands. 900 yards was enough and all they needed. Wilson deserves very little praise for 2013.

But the lions had a better running game according to you, since Seattle only had a better secondary.
We are talking per attempt in most stats, that means total attempts mean nothing. It just shows if Wilson was asked to throe the ball as much as Stafford he would put up larger numbers.
Wilson is more impressive because he was put on a short field, much harder to have a higher YPA. He did all this with a worse running game, worse offensive weapons and a worse offensive line according to you. He did more with less.

He's put up a better QB rating his first two years than stafford has done in his whole career.

If Wilson had as many attempts as Staff he would have 5200 yards , 40TDs, 14 INTs.

Just imagine if he had Calvin Johnson, the Lions online.

 

[dubbsco]

Yeah, he's talking out of both sides of his mouth. He bags on how crappy Seattle's offense is, yet Russell has better numbers than Stafford. Weird.

 

[mhughes0021]

https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2014/07/01/qbs-in-focus-matthew-stafford/

Proof Stafford does more than checkdown to RBs and throw to Calvin. Hughes wrong as always.

? Above the league average with 30.1% of drop-backs ending in two seconds or less and third-highest percentage in the 2.1-to-2.5-second range at 31.6%. Only 9.3% of drop-backs lasted at least 3.6 seconds, fourth-lowest in the league.
? 23.7% of passes went to running backs, above the league average of 19.6%. 3.9% of passes went to running backs in the slot, third-highest percentage in the league.
? Threw, by far, the highest percentage of slants at 13.9%, fourth-highest percentage of post routes at 9.2%, and the fifth-highest percentage of in routes at 8.1%.


See above....slant to calvin or bush/bell in the flat. Hughes right again....

 

[mhughes0021]

Tendencies

• Fifth-highest percentage of drop-backs from the shotgun or pistol at 85.5%.
• Highest percentage of throws between the numbers at 61.7%.
• Above the league average with 30.1% of drop-backs ending in two seconds or less and third-highest percentage in the 2.1-to-2.5-second range at 31.6%. Only 9.3% of drop-backs lasted at least 3.6 seconds, fourth-lowest in the league.
• 23.7% of passes went to running backs, above the league average of 19.6%. 3.9% of passes went to running backs in the slot, third-highest percentage in the league.
• Threw, by far, the highest percentage of slants at 13.9%, fourth-highest percentage of post routes at 9.2%, and the fifth-highest percentage of in routes at 8.1%..

my summation of this is he gets the ball and within 2 seconds he riffles it to 1 of 3 routes. The fact hes top 5 in 3 routes ran with how much we throw the ball is ridiculous. Means the offense is dull, boring and predictable. But with how much LKP watches the games youd think he would have known that already like the rest of us do by only watching 1 game. Some people just don't know how to break down tape....LKP needs to take a class.

 

[LKP]

Dumbass. Rb in the slot was the difference between league average to rbs and lions to rbs. That is why it goes to the rb so much. Bush is like a wr. Of course you ignore that. Congrats on you being clueless again. My tape breakdown still reigns supreme

 

[LKP]

Int rate is low for stafford. 7 ints were not his fault. All Wilson's were his fault. Stafford wins. Watch the tape

 

[LKP]

And ins , slants and posts are tough. But stafford is great at them. Stafford top 5 qb in 2014

 

[LKP]

Wilson gets tds due to turnovers, Wilson can't hold staffords jock. Wilson on Detroit we would go 2-14

 

[JScottWriter]

Wilson gets tds due to turnovers, Wilson can't hold staffords jock. Wilson on Detroit we would go 2-14

And Stafford will never hold a super bowl ring. Wilson has done more in 2 years than Stafford ever will.

 

[LKP]

1.8 percent stafford. 2.2 percent Wilson true int rate.

Stafford is better. Only 400 attempts. Seattle doesn't trust Wilson. It's all turnovers

 

[LKP]

And Stafford will never hold a super bowl ring. Wilson has done more in 2 years than Stafford ever will.

Stafford will win more. Wilson never wins again

 

[mhughes0021]

Dumbass. Rb in the slot was the difference between league average to rbs and lions to rbs. That is why it goes to the rb so much. Bush is like a wr. Of course you ignore that. Congrats on you being clueless again. My tape breakdown still reigns supreme

Well above league avg to rbs. Hughes right again. Lkp fail.

 

[LKP]

Well above league avg to rbs. Hughes right again. Lkp fail.

To rbs, due to in the slot. Meaning running wr routes. You were wrong. No check downs

 

[dubbsco]

You watched every one of Wilson's INT's to determine "who's at fault?"

Yeah, Seattle doesn't trust Wilson. Why would you trust someone who's smart, athletic, puts the ball in the right places, makes things happen, and is a winner? Why would you want that guy on your team? Versus someone who thinks he can just throw the ball wherever the hell he wants, chokes when the game is on the line, and is still trying to fix his footwork in his SIXTH FREAKING YEAR??

 

[kdp80]

Staffords footwork is better than Wilson's too