Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Stafford in Focus

So what. He still makes the throws, less INT ' S, more mobile, produces wins on offense.... and put the Super Bowl in the books with a stellar performance. Stafford has not done that, end of story.

Well, they have a .07% difference in pass/int %. Nothing huge.

However, 6% difference in completion. That's the difference maker there. Hopefully Stafford is fix-able. Last year I'm willing to put up with him. Hopefully he turns a corner.
 
So what. He still makes the throws, less INT ' S, more mobile, produces wins on offense.... and put the Super Bowl in the books with a stellar performance. Stafford has not done that, end of story.

So, if Joe Montana himself had to QB the '13 Lions......and Scott Mitchell won the Super Bowl with the '13 Seahawks......you would consider Mitchell the better QB?
 
So, if Joe Montana himself had to QB the '13 Lions......and Scott Mitchell won the Super Bowl with the '13 Seahawks......you would consider Mitchell the better QB?

If he posted Wilson's better just because he won a SB you might have a point. But that's not what he said..try again.
 
Who's Scott Mitchell in this scenario again? Stafford? Eh, I can see it.
 
Last edited:
So what. He still makes the throws, less INT ' S, more mobile, produces wins on offense.... and put the Super Bowl in the books with a stellar performance. Stafford has not done that, end of story.

So what?? lmfao. Wilson has zero pressure on him in Seattle. He's not asked to win games. He coasts. End of story? What story? Your story? Give me a fn break
 
So what?? lmfao. Wilson has zero pressure on him in Seattle. He's not asked to win games. He coasts. End of story? What story? Your story? Give me a fn break
Lame comeback. A least your not coming back with ignorant LKP reason.
 
Great quarterbacks love pressure, they thrive in it. That's what makes them great.

Saying "they don't ask him to win games" does not explain away his better numbers than Stafford.
 
Last edited:
His numbers are better across the board with less to work with.

Less to work with?? Now all of a sudden the Lions have been loaded with talent? Come again? lol. We have more weapons NOW, but we didn't before.
 
Lame comeback. A least your not coming back with ignorant LKP reason.

And yours was even lamer. Sorry, but Wilson has a cushion of a job in Seattle. Nothing lame about it.
 
Great quarterbacks love pressure, they thrive in it. That's what makes them great.

Saying "they don't ask him to win games" does not explain away his better numbers than Stafford.

Does to me. When you play behind an ALL WORLD defense, the pressure isn't that great. The Lions are constantly trying to score to keep up with other teams. ALWAYS. Wilson plays it safe because he's able to. I'm not knocking Wilson's ability because i think he's a good QB, but he's not asked to do much in that offense. He by far, has the EASIEST job in the NFL. Ride that defense til you can't no more...
 
Less to work with?? Now all of a sudden the Lions have been loaded with talent? Come again? lol. We have more weapons NOW, but we didn't before.

Tate baldwin and kearse is a joke of a receiving corps. Lynch isnt very good out of the backfield. He made them all better.
 
Back
Top