Ink, that's all we have been doing with this guy. We just make excuses for him. If it's not the o-line, it's the run game. Not the run game, it's the WRs. Not the WRs, but the TEs.
It's just the same tired excuse making. It's time for him to make his teammates better. The great ones will lift a team and put them on his back when the rest are struggling. They'll go into a GB, or Arizona, or whatever big dogs and steal a game now and again. He's not capable of it.
Joe Namath has a SuperBowl ring. Dan Marino does not.
Eli Manning has TWo SuperBowl rings. Peyton Manning has one fewer.
Sonny Jurgensen is in the Hall of Fame, he also never won a playoff game in his entire career.
Archie Manning was an excellent quarterback. No playoff wins. No winning seasons.
At the time he retired, Neil Lomax had the 4th highest QBR of all time, behind only Montana, Graham, and Staubach. He also had no playoff wins in his career.
Bert Jones was one of the best QB's of his generation in the 70s... and again, no playoff wins.
Sorry, but I have never bought into the argument that the great QB's make their teams better. Certainly a shitty QB can make his team a lot worse, but the history of the NFL is littered with great QBs on bad team, or great QBs with bad luck, who didn't do as much as Stafford already has.
It's a very romanticized view of the game of football. And while it is a QB league to be sure, take a long look at the great signal callers who walked away with no ring, and you quickly realize that the best QBs are often made better by the players around them, and rarely vice versa.
It's the question people love to debate now... "Was Joe Montana the best of his generation, or did Jerry Rice make Joe Montana the best of his generation?"