sggatecl
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2011
- Messages
- 10,918
Did he really say that? I can't believe even he is that stupid.
Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!
By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!
-
If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.
What draft pick from this year will have the biggest impact?
- Thread starter evolutionkb
- Start date
Did he really say that? I can't believe even he is that stupid.
I can't believe you don't see it. The Lions win every category excpet for secondary.
mhughes0021
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2011
- Messages
- 28,746
Lol first you say our defense is better than Seattle's. Then you try to compare an alex smith sf offense to staffords det offense. You sir...are the dumbest poster on the board.
No I said it's one reason Davis only had 500 yards. You sir can't follow a conversation properly. And I'm clearly superior to you in every way.
Ebron will have 650, more than Davis. But you're expectations of 800-1,000 yards as a rookie are unrealistic. Maybe next year 800 for Ebron.
Davis was also one of the few weapons. The Lions have a ton of weapons to spread around the targets. You need to factor that in when looking at yards. 650 from Ebron and 750 from Tate is all we need.
Last edited:
Win every category except for secondary?? You do realize that the 2013 Seattle defense ranks as one of the best ALL-TIME right? It can be measured against the elite defenses in NFL history. The fact that you think they are even in the same planet is laughable.
Lions have a better Dline and higher ranked LBs. It's a fact. And the Lions offense is way way way better than Seattles.
Which contributed to Seattle giving up 14.4 PPG, vs the Detroit Lions 23.5 PPG?
Oh yeah, Seattle scored 26.1 PPG, Detroit scored 24.7. Sounds like that Detroit's offense is way, way better.
Like you said, yards don't matter. Points do. That's all that needs to be said. You can go ahead and dissect it any way you want. Seattle gave up fewer points per game, and scored more per game. Go ahead and talk about talent. It doesn't matter. Detroit doesn't know how to use their talent, Seattle does.
Oh yeah, Seattle scored 26.1 PPG, Detroit scored 24.7. Sounds like that Detroit's offense is way, way better.
Like you said, yards don't matter. Points do. That's all that needs to be said. You can go ahead and dissect it any way you want. Seattle gave up fewer points per game, and scored more per game. Go ahead and talk about talent. It doesn't matter. Detroit doesn't know how to use their talent, Seattle does.
Last edited:
34 turnovers by the Lions offense caused the Lions defense to give up 104 points.
39 turnovers forced by Seattle caused 26.1 for Seattle. Seattle's offense truly blows.
mhughes0021
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2011
- Messages
- 28,746
So youre saying the lions offense sucks?
tomdalton22
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2011
- Messages
- 25,382
Seattle's offense averaged 8.4 yards per pass attempt which was 2nd in the league. The Lions were 7.3 yards per attempt which was 12th. Seattle averaged 4.3 yards per rushing attempt which was 12th. The Lions were 4.0 which was 22nd. Clearly Seattle was more efficient per play and the more EFFECTIVE offense.
Funny thing is LKP always said Wilson received the benefit of the defense putting them on a short field so often. Which if true, makes this even more impressive since it's harder to put up big plays on a short field.
Talking PPG. Easy to score TDs when you get a short field. Wilson benefited greatly. Wilson can't lead long drives like Stafford. Wilson is sooo overrated.
tomdalton22
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2011
- Messages
- 25,382
he isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer!
We were talking about PPG you nitwits. It's not impressive by Wilson. He was handed points from turnovers. This is the largest group of morons I've ever had to deal with by far. Congrats I'm sad you are Lions fans.
tomdalton22
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2011
- Messages
- 25,382
I stated that Wilson was a more efficient QB and post stats that prove it and you say that he had short fields with have nothing to do with HIS efficiency.
In fact, wouldn't a shorter field make it harder to be more accurate? It sure seems to me that when you get in the red zone, defenses sure clamp down and there's just not as much room to move around. A longer field opens things up all over the place. I would say Russell having a higher accuracy rating with a shorter field is much more impressive.
tomdalton22
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2011
- Messages
- 25,382
It is more difficult to complete passes inside the red zone. Last year Stafford completed less than 50% of his passes inside the red zone and only 3.6 yards per attempt.
Affiliates
