Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

What draft pick from this year will have the biggest impact?

Then why do you post here? Go somewhere else if you can't handle it.

I post here to inform you morons. It is courtesy from me. You should be thankful you are graced with my presence. You are either giant dicks who are negative or the most misinformed lions fans on the planet. I will keep bashing you in the head with my knowledge until you get it and then you will see in 2014 the lions make the playoffs. You will apologize to me for being such morons, argumentative and negative. I'll wait
 
Last edited:
I post here to inform you morons. It is courtesy from me. You should be thankful you are graced with my presence. You are either giant dicks who are negative or the most misinformed lions fans on the planet. I will keep bashing you in the head with my knowledge until you get it and then you will see in 2014 the lions make the playoffs. You will apologize to me for being such morons, argumentative and negative. I'll wait

The only thing you've informed us of is the risk of black tar heroin during pregnancy.

Yep, it's bad.
 
I've informed of the truth and the root cause of the problem. I give you context. I tell you when the run game faltered and who was playing, I tell you which games the Oline sucked, I tell which picks were Staffords fault. I'm more informed than all of you combined.

You can call me an idiot until you are blue in the face, but those names have no backup. Every post I make has backup support, you people just disagree and name call. You offer no support for your arguments, you clearly haven't watch the games enough or really have a clue how to analyze football.

You should thank me for being here and helping you all.
 
I've informed of the truth and the root cause of the problem. I give you context. I tell you when the run game faltered and who was playing, I tell you which games the Oline sucked, I tell which picks were Staffords fault. I'm more informed than all of you combined.

You can call me an idiot until you are blue in the face, but those names have no backup. Every post I make has backup support, you people just disagree and name call. You offer no support for your arguments, you clearly haven't watch the games enough or really have a clue how to analyze football.

You should thank me for being here and helping you all.

You say the Lions are better than the 49ers and Seahawks and we are supposed to take anything you say seriously?
 
You say the Lions are better than the 49ers and Seahawks and we are supposed to take anything you say seriously?

They are talent wise. Once the turnovers get in check this year, it will show in the win column too. Starter for starter, you take Detroit over both of them.
 
Yes, starter for starter I would rather have a team that finished 7-9 versus both teams from the NFC Championship Game, and the eventual Super Bowl winner. Who would want those rosters?
 
Last edited:
They are talent wise. Once the turnovers get in check this year, it will show in the win column too. Starter for starter, you take Detroit over both of them.

Holding onto the ball, catching the ball, and throwing the ball to the right team is a talent. Quit saying the Lions are as talented as these other teams. They don't force turnovers on defense because their defenses are not as good as the teams that are in the playoffs every season.
 
They are talent wise. Once the turnovers get in check this year, it will show in the win column too. Starter for starter, you take Detroit over both of them.

lol....even starter for starter you are high...then add in the fact that both SF and Seattle have MUCH greater depth and it is a NO BRAINER which teams have the better rosters.
 
I'm not high. Lions players rank higher in every category but secondary. The turnovers will come for Detroit and be reduced in Seattle this season. They'll get 30 but not 39. Recovery rates can change and the Lions can get more picks in this new aggressive scheme. And now with Browner and Thurmond gone for Seattle, Maxwell has alot to prove at number 2 CB for them after a good year last year. I like Quin and Ihedigbo just fine at safety too.
 
Rank higher in every category according to who?? Here, let me break this down for you:

Super Bowl champions talent > 3rd place in the worst division in football. End of discussion.
 
I'm not high. Lions players rank higher in every category but secondary. The turnovers will come for Detroit and be reduced in Seattle this season. They'll get 30 but not 39. Recovery rates can change and the Lions can get more picks in this new aggressive scheme. And now with Browner and Thurmond gone for Seattle, Maxwell has alot to prove at number 2 CB for them after a good year last year. I like Quin and Ihedigbo just fine at safety too.

The Lions have won a total of 11 games in the past 2 seasons.

49ers 23 wins, 2 NFC championship games and 1 SB appearance
Seattle 24 wins, 1 NFC championship and a SB title.

It must be bad luck for the Lions!
 
aaa.jpg
 
Rank higher in every category according to who?? Here, let me break this down for you:

Super Bowl champions talent > 3rd place in the worst division in football. End of discussion.

Himself. Whenever someone calls him out on these "rankings" he sidesteps or completely ignores the question.
 
SF and Seattle have 8 playoff wins in the past 2 years. That is more than the Lions regular season wins in 2013 and 7 more playoff wins than the Lions have had in the past 50+ years!
 
I would rather have the talent of every team that made the NFL Playoffs over the Lions, and that includes San Diego who actually has a real QB that's been historically damn good. The reason? They made the playoffs, Lions didn't. They don't make excuses about bad luck, they overcome tipped passes, unlucky fumbles, bad weather.
 
I would rather have the talent of every team that made the NFL Playoffs over the Lions, and that includes San Diego who actually has a real QB that's been historically damn good. The reason? They made the playoffs, Lions didn't. They don't make excuses about bad luck, they overcome tipped passes, unlucky fumbles, bad weather.

They had better luck with injuries and good luck with recovery rates. Lions will overcome in 2014 and I'll be proven right.
 
Fairley and Suh ranked higher, Levy and Tulloch ranked higher. Calvin ranked way higher. Stafford ranked higher, Bush just as good as Lynch with better depth with Bell. We took Tate from them. Ebron over Miller for sure. Pettigrew over him too. Lions Oline for sure. Seattle has secondary only.
 
Last edited:
Weird, somehow "secondary only" won them the Super Bowl convincingly over an offense that was putting up astronomical stats. What a strange occurrence. Must be like the Northern Lights or something. Got lucky.
 
If somehow there was magic pixie dust that sprinkled over Allen Park, and those players all turned into the Seattle players, I would be doing handstands. I would be confident that I would be watching a team that is top to bottom dominant, and will be a guarantee to make the postseason more often than not.
 
I'm sure that Seattle fans would be happy to concede "Pre-season hypothetical Super Bowl champions of potential" for another actual Super Bowl.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top