It's not even about Stafford, you jerkoff. IT'S EVERYTHING. Do you need a sign??
and i dont remember ever saying Stafford was a top 5 QB.
I like the RG. Is that better..?
By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!
Get StartedIt's not even about Stafford, you jerkoff. IT'S EVERYTHING. Do you need a sign??
and i dont remember ever saying Stafford was a top 5 QB.
I like the RG. Is that better..?
RG????
You know, right guard.
Wow .... ok. Smartass
Well you bring up the fact I'm always negative but that's not even close. For the most part I like the offensive line, same with the defensive line, and LB to a lesser extent.
My negative points to the coaches, dumbass Staff - a weak secondary, no depth and players we drafted high that hardy play.
On the other side you're lkp lite..
You like the OLine now?? lol. Bullshit!!
And the DLine? Dont you judge our DLine on sacks and sacks alone? And you consistently question anything Suh does because he's a great big meanie.
And i haven't heard anything postive from anybody about our LBs up until this year. You're fn hilarious, bud. Whatever ....
For the most part, yeah. When did I say I didn't. I just want a new C. I wanted more sacks, no one on here said sacks are the only thing that matters - lkp lite.
Aren't we taking about this year, or if I didn't like the oline last year I'm not suppose to like them this year? Lol.
Another stupid Tony post..
Nothing stupid about it. You're the stupid one.
The OLine was actually good last year lol. So if you didnt like them, good for you.
And YES, there is people on here who say sacks is the only thing that matters ... nice try. Only the dummies actually. Remember the QB pressures and hurries argument? It was like arguing with a fn kid about it.
Now can you please tell us how Joique Bell isnt that good? Because, well, you never "got it". And im the stupid one? Pffffffffft lmao
Nothing stupid about it. You're the stupid one.
The OLine was actually good last year lol. So if you didnt like them, good for you.
And YES, there is people on here who say sacks is the only thing that matters ... nice try. Only the dummies actually. Remember the QB pressures and hurries argument? It was like arguing with a fn kid about it.
Now can you please tell us how Joique Bell isnt that good? Because, well, you never "got it". And im the stupid one? Pffffffffft lmao
Who? Name someone, point to a post. Hurries and pressures aren't the same as sacks. Sacks you lose yards, a down etc. Hurries and pressures they still have a chance to complete passes. Common sense.
I've said Bell needs to be used more. I might not have always wanted him but mind was changed. In the same way I once thought our QB was good.
Lkp lite, where everything turns into roses.
perterman cherilus and raoila sucked ass last year. So if 2/5 of the oline being serviceable means "good" in your world then so be it. But the oline was leaps and bounds better post warlord.
I'm pretty sure he meant this past season when he said last year. I highly doubt Tony meant the 2012 season.
I'm pretty sure he meant this past season when he said last year. I highly doubt Tony meant the 2012 season.
I remember that argument. People trying to say hurries were just important as sacks.
I don't think it's coincidence that 7 of the top 10 teams in sacks made the playoffs and 9 of the bottom 10 teams in sacks didn't make the playoffs.
A sack is a guaranteed loss of yardage and high percentage chance of a fumble. A hurry guarantees NOTHING. A hurry is nothing more than "close but no cigar."
Who? Name someone, point to a post. Hurries and pressures aren't the same as sacks. Sacks you lose yards, a down etc. Hurries and pressures they still have a chance to complete passes. Common sense.
I've said Bell needs to be used more. I might not have always wanted him but mind was changed. In the same way I once thought our QB was good.
Lkp lite, where everything turns into roses.
I remember that argument. People trying to say hurries were just important as sacks.
I don't think it's coincidence that 7 of the top 10 teams in sacks made the playoffs and 9 of the bottom 10 teams in sacks didn't make the playoffs.
A sack is a guaranteed loss of yardage and high percentage chance of a fumble. A hurry guarantees NOTHING. A hurry is nothing more than "close but no cigar."
I'm pretty sure he meant this past season when he said last year. I highly doubt Tony meant the 2012 season.
Who said sacks and pressures are the same? lol. I dont need a dumbass to explain shit to me.
You thought Bell was shit. You never understood the hype on him. You saw "nothing" from him ...remember? lol
Founded in 2011, Detroit Sports Forum is a community of fanatics dedicated to teams like the Lions, Tigers, Pistons, Red Wings, Wolverines, and more. We live and breathe Detroit sports!