Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Coaching Search Recap

Wow .... ok. Smartass

Well you bring up the fact I'm always negative but that's not even close. For the most part I like the offensive line, same with the defensive line, and LB to a lesser extent.

My negative points to the coaches, dumbass Staff - a weak secondary, no depth and players we drafted high that hardy play.

On the other side you're lkp lite..
 
Well you bring up the fact I'm always negative but that's not even close. For the most part I like the offensive line, same with the defensive line, and LB to a lesser extent.

My negative points to the coaches, dumbass Staff - a weak secondary, no depth and players we drafted high that hardy play.

On the other side you're lkp lite..

You like the OLine now?? lol. Bullshit!!

And the DLine? Dont you judge our DLine on sacks and sacks alone? And you consistently question anything Suh does because he's a great big meanie.

And i haven't heard anything postive from anybody about our LBs up until this year. You're fn hilarious, bud. Whatever ....
 
You like the OLine now?? lol. Bullshit!!

And the DLine? Dont you judge our DLine on sacks and sacks alone? And you consistently question anything Suh does because he's a great big meanie.

And i haven't heard anything postive from anybody about our LBs up until this year. You're fn hilarious, bud. Whatever ....

For the most part, yeah. When did I say I didn't. I just want a new C. I wanted more sacks, no one on here said sacks are the only thing that matters - lkp lite.

Aren't we taking about this year, or if I didn't like the oline last year I'm not suppose to like them this year? Lol.

Another stupid Tony post..
 
For the most part, yeah. When did I say I didn't. I just want a new C. I wanted more sacks, no one on here said sacks are the only thing that matters - lkp lite.

Aren't we taking about this year, or if I didn't like the oline last year I'm not suppose to like them this year? Lol.

Another stupid Tony post..

Nothing stupid about it. You're the stupid one.

The OLine was actually good last year lol. So if you didnt like them, good for you.

And YES, there is people on here who say sacks is the only thing that matters ... nice try. Only the dummies actually. Remember the QB pressures and hurries argument? It was like arguing with a fn kid about it.

Now can you please tell us how Joique Bell isnt that good? Because, well, you never "got it". And im the stupid one? Pffffffffft lmao
 
Nothing stupid about it. You're the stupid one.

The OLine was actually good last year lol. So if you didnt like them, good for you.

And YES, there is people on here who say sacks is the only thing that matters ... nice try. Only the dummies actually. Remember the QB pressures and hurries argument? It was like arguing with a fn kid about it.

Now can you please tell us how Joique Bell isnt that good? Because, well, you never "got it". And im the stupid one? Pffffffffft lmao

Who? Name someone, point to a post. Hurries and pressures aren't the same as sacks. Sacks you lose yards, a down etc. Hurries and pressures they still have a chance to complete passes. Common sense.

I've said Bell needs to be used more. I might not have always wanted him but mind was changed. In the same way I once thought our QB was good.

Lkp lite, where everything turns into roses.
 
Nothing stupid about it. You're the stupid one.

The OLine was actually good last year lol. So if you didnt like them, good for you.

And YES, there is people on here who say sacks is the only thing that matters ... nice try. Only the dummies actually. Remember the QB pressures and hurries argument? It was like arguing with a fn kid about it.

Now can you please tell us how Joique Bell isnt that good? Because, well, you never "got it". And im the stupid one? Pffffffffft lmao

perterman cherilus and raoila sucked ass last year. So if 2/5 of the oline being serviceable means "good" in your world then so be it. But the oline was leaps and bounds better post warlord.
 
Who? Name someone, point to a post. Hurries and pressures aren't the same as sacks. Sacks you lose yards, a down etc. Hurries and pressures they still have a chance to complete passes. Common sense.

I've said Bell needs to be used more. I might not have always wanted him but mind was changed. In the same way I once thought our QB was good.

Lkp lite, where everything turns into roses.

hurries means absolutely zero with our secondary. Hurries means we didn't sack him before he completed the pass.
 
perterman cherilus and raoila sucked ass last year. So if 2/5 of the oline being serviceable means "good" in your world then so be it. But the oline was leaps and bounds better post warlord.

I'm pretty sure he meant this past season when he said last year. I highly doubt Tony meant the 2012 season.
 
I'm pretty sure he meant this past season when he said last year. I highly doubt Tony meant the 2012 season.

I'm pretty sure he did. Or else why say it? I think most would agree 2013 OL had been solid.
 
I'm pretty sure he meant this past season when he said last year. I highly doubt Tony meant the 2012 season.

Mitch said he liked the oline this past year so I assumed tony was talking about the year before. I dunno....I get easily confused trying to keep up when they start to argue lol.
 
I remember that argument. People trying to say hurries were just important as sacks.

I don't think it's coincidence that 7 of the top 10 teams in sacks made the playoffs and 9 of the bottom 10 teams in sacks didn't make the playoffs.

A sack is a guaranteed loss of yardage and high percentage chance of a fumble. A hurry guarantees NOTHING. A hurry is nothing more than "close but no cigar."
 
I remember that argument. People trying to say hurries were just important as sacks.

I don't think it's coincidence that 7 of the top 10 teams in sacks made the playoffs and 9 of the bottom 10 teams in sacks didn't make the playoffs.

A sack is a guaranteed loss of yardage and high percentage chance of a fumble. A hurry guarantees NOTHING. A hurry is nothing more than "close but no cigar."

yet another lkp gem....
 
Who? Name someone, point to a post. Hurries and pressures aren't the same as sacks. Sacks you lose yards, a down etc. Hurries and pressures they still have a chance to complete passes. Common sense.

I've said Bell needs to be used more. I might not have always wanted him but mind was changed. In the same way I once thought our QB was good.

Lkp lite, where everything turns into roses.

Who said sacks and pressures are the same? lol. I dont need a dumbass to explain shit to me.

You thought Bell was shit. You never understood the hype on him. You saw "nothing" from him ...remember? lol
 
I remember that argument. People trying to say hurries were just important as sacks.

I don't think it's coincidence that 7 of the top 10 teams in sacks made the playoffs and 9 of the bottom 10 teams in sacks didn't make the playoffs.

A sack is a guaranteed loss of yardage and high percentage chance of a fumble. A hurry guarantees NOTHING. A hurry is nothing more than "close but no cigar."

Nobody said they were as important as a sack. Just that they were a serious stat. Of course i eant the sack but ill take pressure in a QBs face all day .... at least theyre getting there
 
Who said sacks and pressures are the same? lol. I dont need a dumbass to explain shit to me.

You thought Bell was shit. You never understood the hype on him. You saw "nothing" from him ...remember? lol

God forbid I don't evaluate every NFL player correctly like you and LKp. As far as your first sentence when did I say anyone does? Again, another post where you assume something.
 
Back
Top