Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Goodbye schwartz

Rivers has been great this year. Only one more TD than Stafford had (32 compared to 31).

The great Rivers got the Chargers .1 more points per game. .1, not 1.

And completed a lot more passes, many less int, and a much better rating. They're not even close to each other. You probably value ERA.
 
He's 3rd in passing yards, 6th in touchdowns. One of the best 3rd down converting teams in the league. He's better than most of the league. And that is with kris durham and other clowns on the team.

Because he throws so damn much. 58% dude. 7 4th quarter losses mostly because of the offense.
 
Because he throws so damn much. 58% dude. 7 4th quarter losses mostly because of the offense.

Yes, mostly because of the offense. Which is why he needs more weapons. Seriously, name me off the top scoring offense in the nfl. Take away their top star. Name their next 3 scoring options. And more than likely you'd take them over ours in a heartbeat.
 
And completed a lot more passes, many less int, and a much better rating. They're not even close to each other. You probably value ERA.

Points matter the most in this league. But yeah deflect to other things.

And by the way. Rivers 378 completions. Stafford 371. A whole 7 completions. You lose again Mitch.

8 more ints with 100 more throws by Stafford. I can give you 8 ints that weren't Staffords fault too.

Stafford weapons drop rate 9.1%. Rivers 4.2%. Getting closer comp % wise.
 
Yes, mostly because of the offense. Which is why he needs more weapons. Seriously, name me off the top scoring offense in the nfl. Take away their top star. Name their next 3 scoring options. And more than likely you'd take them over ours in a heartbeat.

You have seen his overthrows, eh? We have a team of 6'5" guys...the dude was horrible.
 
Rivers has been great this year. Only one more TD than Stafford had (32 compared to 31).

The great Rivers got the Chargers .1 more points per game. .1, not 1.

Rivers completed almost 70% of his passes. His leading WR was a rookie drafted in the 3rd round. He was heads and shoulders better than Stafford this year....it isn't even remotely close!
 
Woodhead caught 88% of 76 targets. Bush needs to catch like that and Stafford could have amazing comp %.

Keenan Allen gets single coverage. Stafford has some tight windows in double and triple coverage to Calvin when everyone else is covered despite being singled.
 
Rivers is way better than stafford. Anyone arguing otherwise is a fucking idiot. Staff was a bottom 10 qb this year.
 
Last edited:
Rivers completed almost 70% of his passes. His leading WR was a rookie drafted in the 3rd round. He was heads and shoulders better than Stafford this year....it isn't even remotely close!

Points wise and TD wise it is. Rivers better drop rate. Woodhead could catch for 88%. Bush couldn't.

Allen got easier coverage, Calvin has tight windows. Gates is a huge weapon compared to Pettigrew.
 
Points matter the most in this league. But yeah deflect to other things.

And by the way. Rivers 378 completions. Stafford 371. A whole 7 completions. You lose again Mitch.

8 more ints with 100 more throws by Stafford. I can give you 8 ints that weren't Staffords fault too.

Stafford weapons drop rate 9.1%. Rivers 4.2%. Getting closer comp % wise.

You talk about 8 int with more passes but don't mention more completions with less throws. Btw, 8 Int in 100 passes sucks.
 
Points matter the most in this league. But yeah deflect to other things.

And by the way. Rivers 378 completions. Stafford 371. A whole 7 completions. You lose again Mitch.

8 more ints with 100 more throws by Stafford. I can give you 8 ints that weren't Staffords fault too.

Stafford weapons drop rate 9.1%. Rivers 4.2%. Getting closer comp % wise.

That is an INT per 12.5 throws. You aren't helping your argument!
 
You talk about 8 int with more passes but don't mention more completions with less throws. Btw, 8 Int in 100 passes sucks.

BTW they weren't all Staffords fault. Calvin pick against Bucs, tipped picks (Vikings/Giants and Ravens), Hall somehow molesting Calvin on a slant, crazy pick low to Calvin that magically goes to Major Wright.

Stafford=Rivers

Woodhead and Matthews and Gates could catch. Bush couldn't, tighter windows to Calvin and Pettigrew

Royal and Brown could get open. Durham and Broyles couldn't.
 
Last edited:
Because he throws so damn much. 58% dude. 7 4th quarter losses mostly because of the offense.
WRONG!!! if you hold the lead in the 4th quarter, the offense did it's job. at that point it's up to the defense to STOP the other team, preserving the lead. a few dreadful and untimely turnovers were the cause of a few of those losses, yes (but not all 7), but ultimately the defense failed to do their job when the offense did theirs.
 
Points wise and TD wise it is. Rivers better drop rate. Woodhead could catch for 88%. Bush couldn't.

Allen got easier coverage, Calvin has tight windows. Gates is a huge weapon compared to Pettigrew.

They all catch the ball more because the ball is thown in places where it is easy to catch. Gates was good but he is now just a slightly above average TE.
 
They all catch the ball more because the ball is thown in places where it is easy to catch. Gates was good but he is now just a slightly above average TE.

Gates had another good year with good comp %. Bush just drops the ball. He's always done this, not just this year.
 
BTW they weren't all Staffords fault. Calvin pick against Bucs, tipped picks (Vikings/Giants and Ravens), Hall somehow molesting Calvin on a slant, crazy pick low to Calvin that magically goes to Major Wright.

Stafford=Rivers

Woodhead and Matthews and Gates could catch. Bush couldn't, tighter windows to Calvin and Pettigrew

Royal and Brown could get open. Durham and Broyles couldn't.

Oh now you change the discussion. How about his 8 Int in 100 passes. In fact it's less than 100 passes. Lol.
 
Back
Top