Rebbiv
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2011
- Messages
- 6,305
So if a quarterback has a bad rating, is it more on the routes being run, players dropping passes, or is it an indication of the QB not being very good? Ultimately, does anyone really accept responsibility?
These guys are pitchers, they are the ones responsible for shaking the catcher off if they don't like the location, pitch type, etc... They are the ones who perfect their strengths and shore up weaknesses. Personally, it's silly to not put the blame on these guys and just say the catcher isn't doing his job.
I can tell you watching Ian Krol last night, and some of these guys just implode because their pitches don't have any bite on them, my first thought wasn't, "Shit, McCann sucks, he's not calling the right stuff." It was watching these beach balls being thrown to the batter.
I don't feel your football analogy fits in this situation.
There are some pitchers, who tend not to want to "overthink" while pitching. They like to see the sign and throw away. If you ask a pitcher who threw perfect game or no hitter, they will tell you they were "in synch" with their catchers and that they rarely had to shake their catcher off.
In this case, certainly the pitcher has to have "the stuff" to pull it off. Does this take away the responsibility from the pitcher? Absolutely not.
Additionally, statistics are a historical accounting of what happened. Don't isolate on one pitcher (i.e. Krol). It is the volume (sample size) you need to observe. Avila doesn't make a bad pitcher good. McCann doesn't make a good pitcher bad. Yet, as I pointed out, almost all the pitchers had a elevated slugging percentage with McCann catching. Why is that?
1. Setting up too early?
2. Calling too many fastballs?
Additionally, when DET was 23-14 and their pitchers were doing well (4.00 Runs Per Game), it was Avila getting the primary starts. They have since gone 31-43 (worst in the AL), with McCann primarily getting the starts (5.23 Runs Per Game). Even at equal amount of games, DET was 16-21 with 5.65 Runs Per Game after that start, with McCann pretty much the lone starting catcher.
This isn't a "coincidence". Not all of the pitchers started to suck at the same time for no apparent reason. I don't buy it.
We are all Tigers' fans and want what is best for the Tigers. This season is lost, so why not play McCann?
However, unless you or anyone else can so me evidential proof to the contrary, I will maintain at current state, McCann is destined to become a backup or out of the game in 5 years. Could I be wrong? Absolutely. However historical study of statistics, including minor league numbers, supports my claim more than it supports the opposite.
Last edited: