Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!

By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!

Get Started
  • If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.

Khalil Mack on the trade blocks

Tony..bro lol. I don't want to trade Davis and ragnow...at all. I was just saying that's basically the value you get when you give up 2 first round picks. Ofcourse the raiders wouldn't ever do that deal. But that's kind of my point... the picks shouldn't matter when you're getting a talent like mack and a 2nd rounder back.

I know you don't want to trade Ragnow and Davis THE PLAYERS but using them as your examples to prove a point makes no sense to me. The Bears gave up a ton and yes they got a stud but they'll be paying through the nose for him.
And fuck the Bears anyways. Their offense is a joke anyways. They'll be lastin the North. Book it!!
 
I know you don't want to trade Ragnow and Davis THE PLAYERS but using them as your examples to prove a point makes no sense to me. The Bears gave up a ton and yes they got a stud but they'll be paying through the nose for him.
And fuck the Bears anyways. Their offense is a joke anyways. They'll be lastin the North. Book it!!

Not sure on their offense. Last year they had the worst WR's in the league. Their leading receivers were Kendall Wright and Joshua Bellamy. They added Allen Robinson, T. Gabriel & Trey Burton. Those are 3 upgrades. They have two really good RBs. It all depends on Trubisky. If he is "league average" they will have a decent offense. Pair that up with what could be a top 5 defense...they could be an 8 or 9 win team.

That said, I really don't know what Trubisky is. I don't think I saw him play a down last year.
 
We have depth at receiver . I know we didn’t go after Mack but maybe New England has a defensive linemen we could give up for someone? Men our pass rush is going to need some help.
 
Not sure on their offense. Last year they had the worst WR's in the league. Their leading receivers were Kendall Wright and Joshua Bellamy. They added Allen Robinson, T. Gabriel & Trey Burton. Those are 3 upgrades. They have two really good RBs. It all depends on Trubisky. If he is "league average" they will have a decent offense. Pair that up with what could be a top 5 defense...they could be an 8 or 9 win team.

That said, I really don't know what Trubisky is. I don't think I saw him play a down last year.

I still don't trust their WRs and Burton has been a career backup his whole career. Let's see how he handles a starting gig. Maybe he's a stud....idk. RBs are boss on that team and I don't think Trubisky is any good.
 
I still don't trust their WRs and Burton has been a career backup his whole career. Let's see how he handles a starting gig. Maybe he's a stud....idk. RBs are boss on that team and I don't think Trubisky is any good.

I think they can win 7 or 8 games even if the QB is below average. I love that defense.

But I'm with you...I have no idea on the QB
 
I think they can win 7 or 8 games even if the QB is below average. I love that defense.

But I'm with you...I have no idea on the QB

I agree. 6-8 wins for the Bears sound about right. I get a good chuckle on how all of a sudden the Bears are a contender for the division now from some people because of Mack lol. They're not IMO.
 
I agree. 6-8 wins for the Bears sound about right. I get a good chuckle on how all of a sudden the Bears are a contender for the division now from some people because of Mack lol. They're not IMO.

I don't get the contender talk either....but the defense was top 10 last year. They could be an elite defense.
 
well, in the 1st 1/2 of the first game, Mack looks like a game changer. Bears D looks great, Mack all over the field including a defensive TD. The rookie Smith has a sack on his first play as a Bear.
 
Packers looked awful with Aaron in there even before he was hurt.
 
well, in the 1st 1/2 of the first game, Mack looks like a game changer. Bears D looks great, Mack all over the field including a defensive TD. The rookie Smith has a sack on his first play as a Bear.

I love Khalil Mack.....he?s a stud.....but let?s slow it down a bit. The sack/strip/recovery he had Kizer basically ran in to him and held the ball out.

On his pick six the ball was thrown DIRECTLY at him.

Mack is GREAT.....but holy shit a lot of players make those two plays.
 
I love Khalil Mack.....he?s a stud.....but let?s slow it down a bit. The sack/strip/recovery he had Kizer basically ran in to him and held the ball out.

On his pick six the ball was thrown DIRECTLY at him.

Mack is GREAT.....but holy shit a lot of players make those two plays.

they do if they are in the backfield on every down.
 
The key words.. Aaron Rogers. There's a reason he's going to be in the HOF.

No, the key word is gimp. I get that he's fantastic but he didn't look like himself. All this hype about the Chicago defense and Khalil Mack and it didn't matter.

When you decide to get cute on TWO 3rd and 1's, deciding to throw mid to deep instead of running with Howard/Cohen, you deserve to lose no matter who your defense is.
 
No, the key word is gimp. I get that he's fantastic but he didn't look like himself. All this hype about the Chicago defense and Khalil Mack and it didn't matter.

When you decide to get cute on TWO 3rd and 1's, deciding to throw mid to deep instead of running with Howard/Cohen, you deserve to lose no matter who your defense is.


That's what Chicago is. They're the opposite of us.
 
Back
Top